The leaf traits, such as specific leaf area, leaf dry matter content and leaf SPAD value of fourteen Litchi chinensis cultivars were analyzed in this study. The results showed that specific leaf area of three L. chinensis cultivars with apiculate peel were greater than that of two cultivars with flat peel. Among nine cultivars with ridge peel, specific leaf area of five cultivars was greater than that of ‘Heiye’, a cultivar with flat peel, and specific leaf area of four other cultivars was smaller than that of ‘Heiye’. Of all the Litchi chinensis cultivars, speci?c leaf area of thirteen cultivars had positive correlation with leaf dry matter content except ‘Heiye’. The correlation between speci?c leaf area and leaf SPAD value was positive for ‘Shuijingqiu’ and ‘Dadingxiang’, but negative for the other twelve cultivars.
HUANG Xiao-Feng
,
WEI Yang-Lian
,
YU Jin-Chang
,
TIAN Hai-Juan
,
YUAN Zhi-Yong
. Leaf Traits of Different Litchi chinensis Cultivars[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2017
, 46(02)
: 126
-130
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2017.02.006
[1] 黄文娟,李志军,杨赵平,白冠章. 胡杨异形叶结构型性状及其相互关系[J]. 生态学报, 2010,30(17): 4636—4642.
[2] 梁爽,赵庚星,朱西存. 苹果树叶片叶绿素含量高光谱估测模型研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2012,32(5): 1367—1370.
[3] 任昱,卢琦,吴波,刘明虎. 不同模拟增雨下白刺比叶面积和叶干物质含量的比较[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(14): 4707—4715.
[4] 李建国. 荔枝学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008.
[5] 吴淑娴. 中国果树志(荔枝卷)[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1998: 99—198.
[6] 曾燕蓉,朱方容,林强,潘启寿,朱光书,崔秋英,邱长玉,李莉. 两种桑科植物叶面积与叶鲜重的估测方法研究[J]. 广西蚕叶, 2016,53(3): 8—11.
[7] 李先明,秦仲麒,涂俊凡,杨夫臣,朱红艳,刘先琴. 7个早熟梨品种叶面积回归方程的建立[J]. 江西农业学报, 2011,23(5): 36—39.
[8] 胡勐鸿,贾子瑞,李青粉,王军辉,雷曙光,王海仓. 云杉属7种针叶性状种间和种内变异分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013,33(12): 2529—2536.
[9] 陈景蕊,潘静. 不同品种葡萄叶片SPAD值与叶绿素含量相关性分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2015(19): 42—46.
[10] 李晓宇. 杨树叶片SPAD值与叶绿素含量的相关性研究[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2015(2): 7—9.
[11] 高祥斌,张秀省,蔡连捷. 观赏植物叶面积测定及相关分析[J]. 福建林业科技, 2009,36(2): 231—234,251.
[12] Cornelissen J H C, Diez P C, Hunt R. Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1996,84(5):755—765.
[13] Wright I J, Wearoby M. Cross-species relationships between seedling relative growth rate, nitrogen productivity and root vs. leaf function in 28 Australian woody species[J]. Functional Ecology, 2000,14(1): 97—107.
[14] 于龙凤,李富恒,安福全,魏丽艳. 番茄不同节位叶片形态特征与干物质含量的关系[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2009,40(6): 58—62.
[15] 周济源,何俊洁,郭治远,王贝贝,张兴旺,郭传友. 淮北相山主要优势物种比叶面积与叶干物质含量初步研究[J]. 淮北师范大学学报, 2013,34(3): 51—54.
[16] 宝乐,刘艳红. 东灵山地区不同森林群落叶功能性状比较[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(7): 3692—3703．
[17] 高君亮,罗凤敏,赵英铭,张景波,原伟杰,孙非,郝玉光. 乌兰布和沙漠绿洲３种杨树比叶面积和叶干物质含量研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016,3(1): 15—20.
[18] 洪陈洁,林晗,洪伟,王珉,洪滔. 不同品系福建山樱花叶功能性状研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2015,23(2): 191—196.
