Plant physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology

Effect of Preservative on Cut Leaves of Asparagus cochinchinensis

  • YANG Yun-ying ,
  • LU Shu-yi ,
  • WANG Ting-qin
Expand
  • (1.Guangdong Polytechnic of Science and Trade, Guangzhou 510430, Guangdong China; 2.Coastal Agricultural College of Guangdong Ocean University,Zhanjiang 524088, Guangdong China)

Received date: 2020-09-04

  Revised date: 2020-10-13

  Online published: 2020-10-31

Abstract

In this experiment, 150 mg·L-1 citric acid+500 mg·L-1 CaCl2+1 mg·L-1 6-BA was used as the base solution, and preservatives of sucrose and penicillin were added in with different concentrations for the bottle insertion test to study the effects of preservative on vase life, degree of yellowing and physiological changes of cut leaves of Asparagus cochinchinensis. The results showed that the base solution with 100 mg·L-1 penicillin + 0.25% sucrose preservation solution had best preservation effect on cut leaves of A. cochinchinensis. Compared with CK, the vase life was extended by 11.3 days; yellowing occurs 4 days later than the control; the peak of chlorophyll content was delayed by 3 days; the fresh weight change rate was delayed by 2 days and reached the peak, and maintained at a higher level; relative conductivity and MDA maintained a low level; POD activity was delayed for 3 days and peaked, and POD activity was higher than the control, CAT activity was delayed for 6 days and peaked, and maintained a high level. Therefore, the appropriate concentration of sucrose and penicillin could slow down the decline of chlorophyll content and leaf fresh weight, inhibit the production of leaf inner membrane lipid peroxidation product MDA, maintain the relative stability of leaf membrane structure, enhance POD and CAT activity, and maintain asparagus cut leaves.

Cite this article

YANG Yun-ying , LU Shu-yi , WANG Ting-qin . Effect of Preservative on Cut Leaves of Asparagus cochinchinensis[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2020 , 49(05) : 345 -350 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2020.05.004

References

[1] 刘月苹. 唐山北部地区天门冬属(Asparagus L.)植物调查[J]. 吉林农业, 2018(3): 95. [2] 伍仕强,姜朝林. 天门冬的药用价值及栽培技术初探[J]. 农技服务, 2017,34(23): 44–45. [3] 赵明书,陶学进,苏庭才,陈继红,杨平飞,吴明开. 不同类型土壤对天门冬种子育苗的影响[J]. 农技服务, 2020,37(7): 58. [4] 王宝春,姜春华,王锦荣. 不同浓度1-MCP对切花百合的保鲜效果[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2020(6): 16–19. [5] 耿兴敏,李敏,全大治. 蔗糖对百合切花的保鲜效果[J]. 福建林业科技, 2012,39(4): 92–96. [6] 郑鹏丽,周明芹. 硝酸银与6-BA配合处理对康乃馨鲜切花的保鲜效果[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019,47(9): 223–226. [7] 杨运英,杨晓春,王廷芹. 不同浓度明矾对康乃馨切花的保鲜效应[J]. 广东农业科学, 2020,47(4): 47–53. [8] 王廷芹,徐秀琼,谢梅凤. 不同浓度赤霉素对天门冬切叶的保鲜效应[J]. 热带生物学报, 2016,7(1): 64–69. [9] 盛爱武,袁建仲,周厚高. 乙烯及保鲜剂对天门冬切叶的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2007(1): 96–98. [10] 白建波,周银丽,罗冰. 柠檬酸代替AgNO3对香石竹切花保鲜效果的研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2010,49(10): 2466–2468. [11] 向丽钧,魏冰瑶,晏丽. 环保型保鲜剂对月季切花保鲜效果综合研究[J]. 湖南文理学院学报: 自然科学版, 2020,32(2): 53–59. [12] Ichimura K, Suto K. Effects of time of sucrose treatment on vase life, soluble carbohydrate concentrations and production in cut sweet pea flower[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 1999,28: 117–122. [13] Han S S. Role of sugar in the vase solution on postharvest flower and leaf quality of Oriental lily ‘Stargazer’[J]. HortScience, 2003,38(3): 412 –416. [14] 文素珍,任敬民,伍健威. 保鲜剂对非洲菊切花保鲜影响的研究[J]. 佛山科学技术学院学报: 自然科学版, 2010,28(2): 85–89. [l5] 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 北京: 世界图书出版公司, 2000. [16] 郭奇梅. 蔗糖对切花重瓣百合瓶插保鲜效果的研究[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2018(18): 43–44. [17] 徐萌,董梅,周亚平. 不同植物生长调节剂对芍药切花保鲜效果的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2014,42(5): 45–48. [18] Leshem Y Y. Oxygen free radicals and plant senescence[J]. Wheat’s New in Plant Physiology, 1981,12: 1–4. [19] 王利新,燕桐,梁高云清,尹一合,陈凤,代昀倪,李思怡,丛云龙,刘志洋. 不同浓度保鲜剂对香石竹切花叶绿素和膜透性的影响[J]. 吉林农业, 2019,24: 47. [20] 赵敏,姚建英,孟宪敏,宋明月,王丽丽. 百合切花无银保鲜液筛选及其保鲜效果[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017,45(21): 223–225. [21] 王俊宁,刘振强,刘付东标,李润唐. STS处理对富贵竹切叶保鲜效果的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学, 2015,3(3): 435–440. [22] 严景华,蔡永萍,李东林. 保鲜剂对玫瑰切花几个衰老指标的影响[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1997,33(2): 109–111. [23] 邸葆,张钢,陈段芬. 蔗糖浓度对非洲菊切花保鲜效果及生理特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2011(4): 172–175. [24] 胡学俭,孙明高,夏阳,?张金凤,李国雷,曹永富. NaCl胁迫对无花果与海棠膜脂过氧化作用及保护酶活性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2005,25(5): 937–943.
Outlines

/

〈 〉