Plant resources and taxonomy

Comprehensive Evaluation of Rooting Effect on Cuttings of Different Miniature Rose Varieties

  • ZHAO Bing-xue ,
  • ZHOU Lin ,
  • HUANG Qing-jun ,
  • YANG Liu-yan ,
  • YAO Jian-jun ,
  • ZHANG Yong-chun
Expand
  • (1.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Forestry and Pomology Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China; 2.School of Ecological Technology and Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China; 3.Shanghai Honghua Horticulture Co., Ltd., Shanghai 210606, China)

Received date: 2020-10-13

  Revised date: 2021-01-04

  Online published: 2021-02-27

Abstract

Miniature roses are widely favored due to their short plant types and diverse flower colors, the demand for seedlings is increasing year by year. In order to select good miniature rose varieties that are easy to root, this experiment used principal component analysis, membership function and cluster analysis to synthesize 7 root morphological indicators of 7 miniature rose varieties evaluation. The results showed that there were significant differences among rooting abilities of the miniature rose varieties. Seven root morphology indexes of the miniature rose varieties were replaced by 3 independent comprehensive indexes, namely the first principal component, the second principal component and the third principal component. The rooting effects of 7 miniature rose varieties were ‘Lady’, ‘Red Lover’, ‘Jue Lian’, ‘Nu Hong’, ‘Venus’, ‘Spring Color’, and ‘Inspiration’. The ‘Lady’ miniature rose could use general cutting methods in seedling production to ensure a higher survival rate of cuttings.

Cite this article

ZHAO Bing-xue , ZHOU Lin , HUANG Qing-jun , YANG Liu-yan , YAO Jian-jun , ZHANG Yong-chun . Comprehensive Evaluation of Rooting Effect on Cuttings of Different Miniature Rose Varieties[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2021 , 50(01) : 39 -45 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2021.01.007

References

[1] Charles M F. The complete book of miniature roses[M]. New York: Elsevier-Dutton Publishing Co., 1977: 1–5. [2] 徐勤明,王国良,李晓征,宗良纲. 微型月季研究进展综述[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2001,28(6): 34–38. [3] Raju N L, Prasad M N V. Influence of growth hormones on adventitious root formation in semi-hardwood cuttings of Celasturs paniculatus Willd.: a contribution for rapid multiplication and conservation management[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2010,79: 249–252. [4] Ouyang F Q, Wang J H, Li Y. Effects of cutting size and exogenous hormone treatment on rooting of shoot cuttings in Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.][J]. New Forests, 2015,46: 91–105. [5] Kang J, Zhao W, Zhao M, Li G Y, Zhang J Q. The type, position and age effect on the cutting reproduction of Picea crassifolia and its rooting mechanism in the Qilian Mountains[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2015,26(4): 993–1002. [6] 张杰,李健康,段安安,孙宇涵,刘洪山,武素然,李贵芬,李云. 不同质量浓度NAA、IBA对栓皮栎、蒙古栎黄化嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019,41(7): 128–138. [7] Li S B, Huang P, Ding G C, Zhou L L, Tang P, Sun M, Zheng Y Y. Optimization of hormone combinations for root growth and bud germination in Chinesefir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) clone leaf cuttings[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017,7: 5046. [8] 曾斌,黄国林,张力,李卫东. 9种微型月季嫩枝扦插的生根和萌梢能力差异[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2018,(4): 62–64. [9] 汪有良. 微型月季扦插生根能力初步研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2012,39(5): 16–19,38. [10] 王馨雨,王蓉蓉,王婷,杨绿竹,刘洁,黎欢,张群,单杨,丁胜华. 不同品种百合内外鳞片游离氨基酸组成的主成分分析及聚类分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020,41(12): 211–220. [11] 荆延德,张志国. 主成分分析和聚类分析在花卉栽培基质配方选择中的应用[J]. 土壤通报, 2004,35(5): 588–591. [12] 陈娟,陈璐,谢泰祥,彭东辉,艾叶. 基于主成分分析法的墨兰品种观赏价值评价[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2019,48(3): 261–268. [13] 何雪娇,余智城,林金水,林智明,卢永春,黄阿凤. 40份热带花卉种质资源的抗冷性综合评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,46(8): 89–98. [14] 刘伟,张群,李志坚,卞建明,黄绿红,朱向荣,单杨. 不同品种黄花菜游离氨基酸组成的主成分分析及聚类分析[J]. 食品科学, 2019,40(10): 243–250. [15] 贺涛,苏丹萍,李楠,李薇,崔大方. 生长调节剂和基质对东南山茶扦插生根的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2016,45(1): 83–86. [16] 丁丽萍,马力,占玉芳,田晓萍. 基于主成分分析的不同激素处理下宁夏枸杞扦插生根效果的综合评价[J]. 经济林研究, 2017,35(2): 110–115. [17] 王雪萍,龚自明. 激素处理茶树扦插生根效果的综合评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019,17(13): 4495–4500. [18] 孙炜,于瑞宁,张飞,蒋甲福,陈发棣,房伟民. 菊花扦插生根能力的量化评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2019,46(3): 540–548. [19] 吴海东,郭风民,孙桂琴,王升,孙飞. 不同月季品种扦插效果的综合评价[J]. 河南科学, 2018,36(5): 699–703. [20] 于秀林,任雪松. 多元统计分析[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1999. [21] 高洁,姜灵敏,曾艳,陈志涛,张冬梅,鲁琳. 上海耐热月季品种的田间筛选及其综合评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012,31(7): 1707–1713. [22] 朱晓文. 主成分分析中的统计推断问题研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州商学院硕士学位论文, 2012: 1–3. [23] 瞿辉,邵和平,叶晓青,于永军,王李. 不同生长素处理对2个微型月季品种扦插生根的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018,46(19): 159–162. [24] Osterc G. A change in perspective: Stock plant qualities that influence adventitious root formation in woody species[M]// Niemi K, Scagel C. Adventitious Root Formation of Forest Trees and Horticultural Plants-from Genes to Applications. Kerala, India: Research Signpost, 2009: 175–186. [25] Otiende M A, Nyabundi J O, Ngamau K, Opala P. Effects of cutting position of rose rootstock cultivars on rooting and its relationship with mineral nutrient content and endogenous carbohydrates[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2017,(225): 204–212. [26] Tadele Y, Melkamu A, Getachew A. Effects of Indole Butyric Acid (IBA) and Stem Cuttings on Growth of Stenting–Propagated Rose in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia[J]. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015,11(4): 191–197. [27] 左丽娟,张钟,张军云,段家彬,张建康,杨世先,王文智. 不同基质配比对微型月季扦插育苗效果的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2018,46(1): 18–20. [28] 王燕,王亚平,赖永超,刘海涛,王燕君,张乐萍,张广燕,王鸿昌,黄子锋. 华南地区冬季温室补光对微型月季扦插及生长发育的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2019,46(6): 37–45.
Outlines

/

〈 〉