Plant ecology, resources and taxonomy

Analysis of Soil Fertility and Heavy Metal Pollution of Urban Green Space in Huadu, Guangzhou

  • 赖武婷,马红岩,任雄业,朱自飘,卢秋艳,袁富坚,冼纳怀
Expand
  • (1. Guangzhou Carbon Forest Co., Ltd, Guangzhou 510520, Guangdong China;2. Guangzhou Huadu District Landscaping Management Office, Guangzhou 510800, Guangdong China)

Received date: 2022-06-14

  Accepted date: 2022-07-29

  Online published: 2023-01-17

Abstract

Based on the investigation of soil samples of urban green space in Huadu district of Guangzhou, the soil fertility and heavy metal pollution were analyzed and evaluated by using the nutrient grading standard of the second National Soil Census and Nemerow pollution index method. The results showed that the soil bulk density of green space in Huadu urban ranged from 1.25 g·cm–3 to 1.75 g·cm–3. The range of porosity was 30.81%–47.42%, and the pH was from 6.16 to 7.68. The contents of organic matter were below grade 4, and nitrogen and phosphorus were seriously deficient. In different types of green space, the heavy metal pollution of roadside green space soil was the most serious, followed by the green space on both sides of the main road; the pollution of As was the most serious in the study area, followed by Pb, not polluted by Zn, and Cu、Cd、Cr、Ni、Hg had different degrees of pollution. Correlation analysis showed that soil pH was significantly correlated with total potassium and alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen. Organic matter was significantly correlated with total nitrogen. Total nitrogen and total phosphorus were significantly positively correlated with alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen and available phosphorus, respectively. And total potassium was significantly negatively correlated with alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen. Among heavy metal elements, Cu was significantly correlated with Zn, Cr and Ni; Zn was significantly correlated with Cu, Pb, Cd, Cr and Ni; Pb was significantly correlated with Zn and Cd; and Cr was significantly correlated with Cu, Zn, Ni. As and Hg had no significant correlation with other heavy metals.

Cite this article

赖武婷,马红岩,任雄业,朱自飘,卢秋艳,袁富坚,冼纳怀 . Analysis of Soil Fertility and Heavy Metal Pollution of Urban Green Space in Huadu, Guangzhou[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2022 , 51(4) : 264 -271 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2022.04.004

References

[1] 于法展, 尤海梅, 李保杰, 赵文. 徐州市不同功能城区绿地土壤的理化性质分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2007(3): 85–88. 

[2 ] 张甘霖, 赵玉国, 杨金玲, 赵文君, 龚子同. 城市土壤环境问题及其研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2007(5): 925–933. 

[3] 常进. 哈尔滨城市绿地土壤调查及改良效果研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学硕士学位论文, 2015. 

[4] 朱本国, 何琴, 张宗红, 胡艳燕, 陈祥, 李娟. 重庆城市绿地土壤质量变化趋势分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020(10): 52–57. 

[5] 陈洪, 付强, 胡艳燕. 重庆市主城区城市绿地土壤质量特征分析及评价[J]. 贵州科学, 2015, 33(4): 69–74. 

[6] 康帅. 北京城市绿地土壤重金属污染研究进展[J]. 现代园艺, 2020, 43(21): 27–31. 

[7] 刘绍贵, 张桃林, 王兴祥, 潘剑君. 南昌市城郊表层土壤重金属污染特征研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(2): 463–466. 

[8] 陈佳林,李仁英,谢晓金, 王红, 徐静, 邵京, 简静, 阿克居里?乌尔曼, 沈嘉, 央宗. 南京市绿地土壤重金属分布特征及其污染评价[J/OL]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(2): 909–916. 

[9] 孙变变, 赵银鑫, 常丹, 吴文忠, 张勇, 田硕丰. 银川市城市绿地土壤重金属分布特征及其生态风险评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(6): 262–268,277. 

[10] 广州市花都区人民政府. 花都概况[EB/OL]. (2021-11-26) https://www.huadu.gov.cn/zjhd/hdgs/hdgl/content/post_7934106.html. 2022-02-13. 

[11] 翟航. 长春市土壤重金属分布规律及土壤环境质量评价研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学硕士学位论文, 2007. 

[12] Rasmussen I A. Soil Quality Test Kit Guide[EB/OL]. 2001. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_050956.pdf 

[13] 姚贤良, 程云生. 土壤物理学[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986. 

[14] 朱仕明. 广州市常见园林绿化植物养分及其光合荧光特性研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学硕士学位论文, 2016. 

[15] 郑鹏然, 周树南. 食品卫生全书[M]. 北京: 红旗出版社, 1996. 

[16] 周启星, 宋玉方. 污染土壤修复原理与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004. 

[17] 陈建安, 林健, 兰天水, 张小平, 邱卿如, 张志超, 杜恣闲, 陈益林, 张琦, 汤小羚. 山区公路边土壤铅污染水平及其分布规律研究[J]. 海峡预防医学杂志, 2001, 7(2): 5–8. 


Outlines

/