Plant ecology, resources and taxonomy

Quality Evaluation of Public Welfare Forest in Yingde City

  • 谭俊杰,黄华蓉
Expand
  • (Guangdong Lingnanyuan Exploration and Design Co. Ltd., Guangzhou 510095, Guangdong China)

Received date: 2022-09-15

  Accepted date: 2022-10-20

  Online published: 2023-01-17

Abstract

This study used the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the forest quality of public welfare forests in Yingde City, Guangdong Province. According to the productivity status, stand stability, and soil conditions, nine indicators such as average diameter at breast height, average tree height, and canopy density were selected, and a public welfare forest quality evaluation index system was established and graded. The results showed that the comprehensive quality grade of the public welfare forest in Yingde was good, and the productivity was excellent. The overall age group of public welfare forests were dominated by young and middle aged forests, and the area of near mature and over mature forests with good ecological benefits were relatively low. The comprehensive forest quality evaluation of public welfare forests in all age groups increased with the increasing of age composition maturity. From the weight of evaluation indicators, the productivity status was the most important indicator to evaluate the impact of public welfare forests. The canopy density, forest community structure and litter thickness were important indicators to evaluate the impact of productivity, stand stability and soil conditions on public welfare forests. It was suggested that in the future construction and management of public welfare forests, the forest structure of public welfare forests should be optimized, and the forest types and age groups should be strategically adjusted. Under the condition of not changing the existing vegetation coverage and canopy density as far as possible, appropriate thinning, replanting, and replanting should be carried out to improve the quality of forests. Long term continuous monitoring of public welfare forests should be carried out to master the dynamic change law of the quality of public welfare forests.

Cite this article

谭俊杰,黄华蓉 . Quality Evaluation of Public Welfare Forest in Yingde City[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2022 , 51(5) : 368 -373 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2022.05.006

References

[1] 国家林业局植树造林司. GB/T 18337.1–2001 生态公益林建设导则[S]. 国家质量技术监督局, 2001. 

[2] 袁俊平. 公益林生态效能特点及管护[J]. 中国林业, 2010(22): 56. 

[3] 武生权, 霍炳南, 谷建才. 承德市滦平县生态公益林质量评价[J]. 林业与生态科学, 2018, 33(4): 395–401. 

[4] 李红振. 辽宁省生态公益林质量监测与评价[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2022, 48(2): 29–34. 

[5] 齐也, 江瑶, 张中瑞. 广东蕉岭生态公益林质量评价[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2021, 37(4): 91–95. 

[6] 张会儒, 雷相东, 张春雨, 赵秀海, 胡雪凡. 森林质量评价及精准提升理论与技术研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5): 1–18. 

[7] 严会超. 生态公益林质量评价与可持续经营研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学硕士学位论文, 2005. 

[8] 黄卫平. 生态公益林质量评价探析[J]. 林业科技情报, 2020, 52(2): 41–43. 

[9] 杨倩楠, 石莹怡, 张泽宇, 王超. 基于模糊物元模型的生态公益林综合效益评价——以英德市为例[J]. 广西林业科学, 2022, 51(1): 84–92. 

[10] 刘伟, 谢小祎. 森林质量评价及精准提升理论与技术研究[J]. 山西农经, 2019(14): 75–76. 

[11] 王建军, 安冰. 基于层次分析法的广西国有派阳山林场森林健康状况综合评价[J]. 西部林业科学, 2022, 51(3): 114–117. 

[12] 夏本安, 文敏, 任煜堃, 陈佳楠, 糜新宇, 王品, 唐代生. 基于层次分析法的湖南省森林碳汇发展潜力评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(11): 97–102. 

[13] 梅浩, 彭泰来, 桂来庭. 广东省国家级公益林质量评价[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019(2): 15–20. 

[14] 齐也, 江瑶, 张中瑞. 广东蕉岭生态公益林质量评价[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2021, 37(4): 91–95. 

[15] 李红振. 辽宁省生态公益林质量监测与评价[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2022, 48(2): 29–34. 

[16] 孙敏, 周春国. 小班尺度森林资源质量评价——以南京市老山林场为例[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(2): 101–104. 

[17] 胡焕香, 佘济云, 张敏, 毛旭鹏, 孟伟. 基于小班尺度的宁远河流域森林健康评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(2): 182–186. 

[18] 李红振. 辽宁省生态公益林质量监测与评价[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2022, 48(2): 29–34. 

[19] 余志明. 生态公益林管护问题及解决途径探析[J]. 绿色科技, 2019(13): 214–215.

Outlines

/