Research articles

Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Cutting Rooting Ability of Rosa chinensis Varieties

  • 陈 娟,郑天锐,李世峰,李 伟,张 颢,宋 杰
Expand
  • (1. Flower Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Engineering Research Center for Ornamental Horticulture / Key Laboratory of Yunnan Flower Breeding, Kunming 650205, Yunnan China; 2. Institute of Qinghai-Tibet Platea, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan China; 3. College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan China; 4. Yunnan Jicheng Landscape Technology Co., Ltd., Honghe 652339, Yunnan China)

Received date: 2024-07-11

  Accepted date: 2024-08-19

  Online published: 2025-01-25

Abstract

To comprehensively evaluate the rooting ability of different types and varieties of rose, and select the varieties with a strong rooting ability to provide reference for the future production and breeding of rose varieties, 59 rose varieties introduced and cultivated in Kunming, Yunnan Province, China were used as experimental materials, the root morphological indexes of rose cuttings were measured by WinRHIZO root analysis system, and the rooting ability of each rose variety was comprehensively quantitatively evaluated by principal component analysis and membership function analysis. The distribution of the root indexes of rose cuttings basically conformed to the normal distribution, except for the number of branches, the difference of the root indexes was small. Principal component analysis transformed 7 single indicators into 2 independent factors, with a cumulative contribution rate of 89.53%. Through membership function analysis, it was found that there were 23 varieties with a comprehensive score ≥0.40, accounting for 38.98%. In this study, 10 rose varieties with the strongest rooting ability were selected, including ‘Angela’, ‘Rouge Royal’, ‘Red Apple rose’, ‘Clg White Eden Rose’, ‘Highgrove’, ‘Pink Flamingo’, ‘Fensemenghuan’, ‘New Imagine’, ‘Billet Doux’ and ‘Crown Princess Margareta’, which can be used as a breed for large-scale production and as a parent for genetic improvement.

Cite this article

陈 娟,郑天锐,李世峰,李 伟,张 颢,宋 杰 . Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Cutting Rooting Ability of Rosa chinensis Varieties[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2024 , 53(5) : 459 -467 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2024.05.009

References

[1] Rose L, Lobet G. Accuracy of image analysis tools for functional root traits: A comment on Delory et al., 2017 [J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2019, 10(5): 702–711. 

[2] 韩丹丹, 阮芳, 赵小慧, 李振涛, 李成俊, 马策. 102份切花月季品种资源表型多样性分析与综合评价[J/OL]. 分子植物育种, 2024: 1–17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal- FZZW2024042600C.html. [2024-07-11] 

[3] 周丹燕. 不同基质配比对6个月季品种扦插繁殖效果的影响[J]. 植物学研究, 2023, 12(1): 18–25 

[4] 杨碧楠, 严斐瑶, 刘明会, 明凤. 不同外源生长激素处理对两个月季品种扦插生根率的影响[J]. 上海师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 52(4): 468–477. 

[5] 张宛, 霞李彤. 速效ABD植物生根促进剂在丰花月季扦插中的应用[J]. 广西农业科学, 2004, 35(3): 231. 

[6] 谢安德, 侯文韬, 蒋志勇, 宋超, 伍慧瑜, 柯永芳, 任安. 植物生长调节剂ABT处理对藤本月季扦插生根效果的影响及其相关性和主成分分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(22): 123–126. 

[7] 殷芳芳, 吴君, 连黄涛, 吴冬, 童再康. 丰花月季扦插繁殖技术研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(12): 71–75. 

[8] 赵冰雪, 周琳, 黄清俊, 杨柳燕, 姚建军, 张永春. 不同微型月季品种扦插生根效果综合评价[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2021, 50(1): 39–45. 

[9] 孙炜, 于瑞宁, 张飞, 蒋甲福, 陈发棣, 房伟民. 菊花扦插生根能力的量化评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(3): 540–548. 

[10] 刘浩杰, 江婷蕊, 张雪峰, 苏江硕, 房伟民, 管志勇, 陈发棣, 张飞. 39个传统秋菊品种扦插生根能力综合评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2024, 33(2): 91–98. 

[11] 孙雪莲, 杨楚童, 胡亚楠, 邹显花. 植物扦插生根机理的研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(10): 33–40. 

[12] 赵鑫, 赵丽丽, 王普昶, 陈超. 内生真菌和丛枝菌根真菌提高植物逆境适应性研究进展[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(3): 577–591. 

 [13] 宋杰, 郑天锐, 张艺萍, 李世峰, 许凤, 王继华, 张颢, 瞿素萍. 昆明地区月季黑斑病发生规律及抗性评价[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 37(1): 47–53. 

[14] 杨佳, 刘家迅, 梁明泰, 李学, 朱洪凤, 王春, 吴红芝. 云南地区月季白粉病发生及抗性鉴定[J]. 南方农业学报, 2023, 54(10): 2949–2957. 

[15] 石力匀, 冯叶, 赵宗胜, 王佳妮, 代挽玉, 焦明丽, 何松林, 王政, 尚文倩, 申玉晓. 非生物胁迫对月季生长发育影响的研究进展[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2024, 58(1): 1–14. 

[16] Hui F, Xie Z W, Li H G, Guo Y, Li B G, Liu Y L, Ma Y T. Image–based root phenotyping for field-grown crops: An example under maize/soybean intercropping [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(6): 1606–1619. 

[17] 孔茹洁, 陈清, 赵英. 网格交叉法与WinRHIZO扫描法在植物根长测定中的比较[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 43(4): 20–24. 

[18] 王小东, 王小青, 李令, 史文君. 丰花月季在不同基质中扦插繁殖研究[J]. 青海农林科技, 2022(3): 89–92. 

[19] 谢安德, 尹冬勋, 侯文韬, 蒋志勇, 宋超, 伍慧瑜. 藤本月季繁殖技术在国内的研究进展[J]. 现代园艺, 2022, 45(15): 9–11. 

[20] 雷利锋, 赵小娟, 马潇源, 刘新伟, 张黎. 微型盆栽月季扦插生根及根系生长因素分析[J]. 农业科学研究, 2020, 41(2): 81–86. 

[21] 叶水英, 张玉芬. 不同植物生长调节剂对月季扦插生根的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2023, 29(Z1): 37–40. 

[22] 何建科, 王静, 杜曲, 谢秋兰. 不同基质和植物生长调节剂对月季扦插生根的影响[J]. 中南农业科技, 2024, 45(2): 38–42. 

[23] 宗树斌, 吴旭丽, 陈少卿, 付丹阳, 蔡鸿宇. 微型月季‘丘比特’恒温基质扦插繁殖技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(34): 79–85. 

[24] 史星雲, 徐珊珊, 李艳冬, 李运兴, 郭方其, 殷益明. 基于主成分和聚类分析对切花百合品质的综合评价[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 54(4): 510–516. 

[25] 张琳, 程亚男, 张欣, 杨伟婷, 孔庆涛, 谢东锋. 两种植物生长调节剂对木槿插穗生根的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(3): 123–129. 

[26] 侯赵玉, 龚亦钊, 钱祎, 程卓雅, 陶俊, 赵大球. 芍药耐热性评价及其鉴定指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(23): 4742–4756. 

[27] 叶康, 陈伯祥, 杜习武, 秦俊, 曾丽, 胡永红. 3个玉兰材料对水涝胁迫的响应与耐涝性评价[J]. 西北植物学报, 2023, 43(6): 940–947. 

[28] Wang M B, Zhang Q. Issues in using the WinRHIZO system to determine physical characteristics of plant fine roots [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(2): 136–138. 

[29] Liese R, Alings K, Meier I C. Root branching is a leading root trait of the plant economics spectrum in temperate trees [J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 315. 

 [30] 田厚禄, 王二林. 栓皮栎控根育苗方法对苗木生长的影响研究[J]. 花卉, 2022(16): 145–147. 

[31] 李立文, 阳春明, 裴劲松, 谭显胜, 左少艾. 湘中地区露地栽培月季品种的筛选与综合评价[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2022(3): 67–71.

Outlines

/