This study investigated the phenotypic characteristics and diversity of Cinnamomum burmannii plants from various provenances across the country. Eight provenances were selected as test materials, and twenty-two biological phenotypic traits, including crown shape, leaf structure, branch formation, and plant height, were measured. Phenotypic variations were analyzed through correlation and difference analysis. The results indicated significant differences among the twenty-two biological phenotypic traits, particularly in plant height, ground diameter, petiole length, and leaf length. Notably, the provenances from Shaoguan and Jian'ou exhibited the highest growth increments, which aligns with their strong growth potential. Furthermore, the analysis of the primary phenotypic trait growth increments across different provenances revealed that the Gangzhou provenance showed the largest growth increment in leaf width, demonstrating significant variation. The Shaoguan provenance recorded the highest growth increment in leaf length, again with significant differences noted. Overall, the growth increment and potential of the Shaoguan provenance were found to be the most pronounced. Additionally, cluster analysis of C. burmannii from the eight provenances, based on biological phenotypic trait indicators, suggested that the similarity of phenotypic traits was somewhat correlated with geographical location. The findings of this research
will provide quantitative baseline data on relevant phenotypic traits, contributing to the conservation and utilization of C. burmannii resources.
许泽宁，蓝彩嘉，李 露，陈 华
. Diversity Analysis of Phenotypic Traits of Cinnamomum burmannii from Different Provenances in China[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2025
, 54(1)
: 54
-61
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2025.01.007
[1] 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志(第31卷) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1982: 202–203.
[2] 伍观娣, 连辉明, 张春花, 李兵, 陈杰连, 何波祥, 张谦, 汪迎利. 广东阴香叶精油及其主要化学成分含量变异与评价[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2020, 36(6): 88–95.
[3] 陈潆. 阴香与香樟木材探究[J]. 市场监管与质量技术研究, 2022(1) : 2–4.
[4] 邓超澄, 霍丽妮, 李培源, 陈睿，邓艳红，何春玲，卢澄生. 广西阴香叶挥发油化学成分及其抗氧化性研究[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2010, 16(17): 105–109.
[5] Li F P, Huang S Q, Mei Y, Wu B G, Zhuang W H, Zuan P L, Cai S K, Liu Q M , Hou Z H, Zhao J L, Wang J H. High-quality genome assembly of Cinnamomum burmannii (chvar. Borneol) provides insights into the natural borneol biosynthesis [J]. BioRxiv, 2024, 31(1): 1–2.
[6] Tan M, Gan D, Wei L, Pan Y, Tang S, Wang S. Isolation and characterization of pigment from Cinnamomum burmannii peel [J]. Food Research International, 2011, 44(7): 2289–2294.
[7] 黄俊华, 洪渊, 张冬鹏. 深圳7种园林植物叶绿素荧光特性及其对大气SO2浓度的响应[J]. 生态科学, 2007(1): 22–26.
[8] 张爱民, 阳文龙, 方红曼, 吕慧颖, 邓向东, 葛毅强, 魏珣, 杨维才.作物种质资源研究态势分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(3): 377–382.
[9] 江香梅, 林富荣. 樟树种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2018: 13–20.
[10] 宋钊, 陈潇, 常静静, 李静, 曹健, 何裕志, 张白鸽. 辣椒种质资源果色多样性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(28): 24–32.
[11] Yan L, Li Q, Zhang Y, Zhu C. Computer vision quantization research on the architectural color of Avenida de Almeida Ribeiro in Macau based on the human eye perspective [J]. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2022, 16(9): 951718–951718.
[12] 赵兰, 杨金珠, 李桂盛, 胡松竹. 阴香不同种源及家系间苗期生长研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2012(10): 84–88.
[13] Fan X Y, Jia W W , Li R F, Li D D, Zhang C. Growth difference of planted Pinus koraiensis from different provenances in Maoer Mountain, China [J]. The journal of applied ecology, 2024, 35(7): 1735–1743.
[14] 刘舒, 马正兵, 于晓丽. 不同种源桃金娘果实表型性状多样性[J]. 经济林研究, 2024, 42(2): 54–61.
[15] 许方宏, 易观路, 罗建华, 梁庆华, 林国荣, 潘华丽. 樟科5个树种育苗技术[J]. 广东林业科技, 2003(3): 61–63.
[16] 张跃, 鲁向晖, 张海娜, 赵姣, 另青艳, 李刚, 金志农. 四川省不同种源樟树表型性状多样性分析[J]. 宜宾学院学报, 2024(4): 8–9.
[17] Venter P, Ferreras A E, Verga A, Funes G. Germination traits of Prosopis alba from different provenances [J]. Seed Science and Technology, 2015, 43(3): 548–553.
