Reviews

Advance on Investigation and Diagnostic Technology of Wood Decay Fungi in Urban Trees

  • 邓嘉茹,孙龙华,张劲蔼
Expand
  • (Guangzhou Institute of Forestry and Landscape Architecture / Guangzhou Collaborative Innovation Center on Science-tech of Ecology and Landscape, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong China)

Received date: 2024-08-19

  Accepted date: 2024-11-07

  Online published: 2025-05-22

Abstract

Urban trees are an important part of urban green spaces and play important ecological functions. Wood decay fungi are one of the important threats to the health of urban trees. The occurrence of wood decay fungi in urban trees not only directly causes tree growth decline and affects the landscape, but also poses potential threats to personal and property safety due to tree decay and failure. Therefore, investigation and diagnosis of wood decay fungi have become an important part of tree risk assessment. This paper conducts a relatively systematic and comprehensive review from the aspects of domestic and foreign wood decay fungi resources investigation and diagnostic technology in urban trees. Wood decay fungi have been studied abroad for more than 200 years, but the main focus has been on research into the classification, decay mechanisms, and their role in tree risk assessment. Over the past 30 years, China has made considerable progress in research on wood decay fungi, with much of the focus on the diversity of large fungi in forest ecosystems and the systematic study of the taxonomic status of important fungal groups. Some advanced instruments such as tree radar and stress wave detection have been applied in diagnosing wood decay fungi, helping to assess the extent of decay and related risks and providing crucial technical support for the protection and management of urban trees. With the development of molecular biology, novel molecular detection techniques such as DNA barcoding, real-time PCR, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification have been widely applied, significantly improving the rapid diagnostic capabilities of wood decay fungi compared to traditional morphological identification methods. This paper aims to provide a reference for the identification and early diagnosis of wood decay fungi.

Cite this article

邓嘉茹,孙龙华,张劲蔼 . Advance on Investigation and Diagnostic Technology of Wood Decay Fungi in Urban Trees[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2025 , 54(1) : 100 -108 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2025.01.013

References

[1] 黎彩敏, 翁殊斐, 林云, 庞瑞君. 园林树木健康与安全性评价研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2009(7): 186–189.
[2] 李央央. 福州古树名木健康状况调查及木材腐朽菌的研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学硕士学位论文, 2014.
[3] Fukui Y, Miyamoto T, Tamai Y, Koizumi A, Yajima T. Use of DNA sequence data to identify wood-decay fungi likely associated with stem failure caused by windthrow in urban trees during a typhoon [J]. Trees, 2018, 32: 1147–1156.
[4] 张乔松, 杨伟儿. 古树、大树的安全评估(上)[J]. 园林, 2014(2): 64–68.
[5] 李秋实, 魏玉莲. 中国热带地区木腐真菌物种组成及分布特征[J]. 菌物学报, 2021, 40(10): 2653–2672.
[6] 李明月, 钱俊, 李光耀. 木腐菌及其腐朽机理研究进展[J]. 安徽林业科技, 2012, 38(3): 33–35.
[7] 文娅, 王爽. 园林树木腐朽病研究综述[J]. 花卉, 2024(6): 178–180.
[8] 魏玉莲, 戴玉成. 木材腐朽菌在森林生态系统中的功能[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(10): 1935–1938.
[9] 武英达, 满孝武, 员瑗, 戴玉成. 中国各省植物园中多孔菌种类,分布和组成[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 22213.
[10] 王爽. 北京地区几种常见园林树木腐朽病的危害与防治策略[J]. 北京园林, 2022, 38(2): 52–58.
[11] 戴玉成. 中国木本植物病原木材腐朽菌研究[J]. 菌物学报, 2012, 31(4): 493–509.
[12] 高敏, 刘建军. 园林树木安全性研究概述[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2014, 29(4): 278–281, 292.
[13] Schmidt O, Gaiser O, Dujesiefken D. Molecular identification of decay fungi in the wood of urban trees [J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2012, 131(3): 885–891.
[14] Nicolotti G, Gonthier P, Guglielmo F. Advances in detection and identification of wood rotting fungi in timber and standing trees [M]// Gherbawy Y, Voigt K. Molecular Identification of Fungi. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
[15] 吴跃开, 余金勇, 李晓虹. 园林树木腐朽病的发生与防治[J]. 林业实用技术, 2011(2): 37–39.
[16] Soge A O, Popoola O I, Adetoyinbo A A. Detection of wood decay and cavities in living trees: A review [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2020, 51(4): 937–947.
[17] 李伟, 李贤军, 王望, 朱愿, 曹金珍. 木材腐朽机理研究现状及展望[J]. 世界林业研究, 2022, 35(2): 64–69.
[18] Guglielmo F, Bergemann S E, Gonthier P, Nicolotti1 G, Garbelotto M. A multiplex PCR-based method for the detection and early identification of wood rotting fungi in standing trees [J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2007, 103: 1490–1507.
[19] Erkkil? R, Niemel? T. Polypores in the parks and forests of the city of Helsinki [J]. Karstenia, 1986, 26: 1–40.
[20] Gáper J, Sliacka I, Hvolková L. Diversity and ecology of polypores in urban vegetation of northern, central and southern Slovakia [J]. Folia Oecologica, 2014, 41(1): 17–23.
[21] Venturella G, Gargano M L, Raimondo F M. Wood-decay fungi on trees of the city of Palermo(Sicily, Italy) [J]. Borziana, 2020, 1: 109–119.
[22] Oskay F, Kaya A. Frequency of wood decay fungi in urban trees in ?ank?r? [J]. Anatolian Journal of Forest Research, 2022, 8(1): 90–99.
[23] Burakrai O, Meunpong P, Nipitwattanaphon M, Kaewgrajan T. Wood-Decaying macrofungi and risk assessment of trees in Lumphini Park, Bangkok [J]. Thai Journal of Forestry, 2022, 41(2): 1–14.
[24] Hong Y, Tan J Y, Xue H, Chow M L, Ali M, Ng A, Leong A, Yeo J, Koh S M, Tang M S Y, Lee Y Y, Choong A M F, Lee S M L, Ponti R D, Chan P M, Lee D, Wong J Y, Mutwil M, Fong Y K. A metagenomic survey of wood decay fungi in the urban trees of Singapore [J]. Journal of Fungi, 2023, 9: 460.
[25] Terho M, Hantula J, Hallaksela A M. Occurrence and decay patterns of common wood-decay fungi in hazardous trees felled in the Helsinki City [J]. Forest Pathology, 2007, 37: 420–432.
[26] Terho M, Hallaksela A M. Decay characteristics of hazardous Tilia, Betula, and Acer trees felled by municipal urban tree managers in the Helsinki city area [J]. Forestry, 2008, 81: 151–159.
[27] Gibbs J N, Greig B J W. Survey of parkland trees after the great storm of October 16, 1987 [J]. Arboric Journal, 1990, 14: 321–347.
[28] Schwarze F W M R, Engels J, Mattheck C. Fungal strategies of wood decay in trees [M]. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2000.
[29] Schwarze F W M R. Diagnosis and prognosis of the development of wood decay in urban trees [M]. Rowville: ENSPEC Pty Ltd, 2008.
[30] 饭冢康雄, 舟久保敏. 街路树倒伏对策手册(第2版)[M]. 日本: 国总研资料第1059号, 2019.
[31] Luley, C J. Wood decay fungi common to urban living trees in the Northeast and Central United States [M]. Naples (NY, USA): Urban Forest Diagnostics, LLC, 2022.
[32] 戴玉成, 杨祝良, 崔宝凯, 吴刚, 袁海生, 周丽伟, 何双辉, 葛再伟, 吴芳, 魏玉莲, 员瑗, 司静. 中国森林大型真菌重要类群多样性和系统学研究[J]. 菌物学报, 2021, 40(4): 770–805.
[33] Xu T M, Sun Y F, Liu S, Song C G, Gao N, Wu D M, Cui B K . Ceriporiopsis tianshanensis (Polyporales, Agaricomycetes) and Sidera tianshanensis (Hymenochaetales, Agaricomycetes), two new species of wood-inhabiting fungi from Xinjiang, Northwest China [J]. MycoKeys, 2023, 98: 1–18.
[34] Yuan Y, Bian L S, Wu Y D, Chen J J, Wu F, Liu H G, Zeng G Y, Dai Y C. Species diversity of pathogenic wood-rotting fungi (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) in China [J]. Mycology, 2023, 14(3): 204–226.
[35] 黎彩敏, 翁殊斐, 庞瑞君. 广州市14种常用园林树木健康评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010(2): 203–207.
[36] 刘春静, 王忠, 孙向前. 辽宁铁岭柳树边材腐朽病初报[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2004, 23(1): 22–24.
[37] 丁婧钰, 李增平. 垂柳茎腐病病原鉴定及其生物学特性测定[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018, 39(3): 547–552.
[38] 戴玉成, 高强. 刺槐心材腐朽病初报[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2005, 33(1): 95, 98.
[39] 王金鸽. 国槐心材腐朽病病原学及其致病机制初探[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学硕士学位论文, 2024.
[40] 刘宇, 李赛, 许晓波, 伍建榕. 滇朴干基腐朽病发生规律及综合防治[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2011, 31(3): 54–56.
[41] 岑炳沾, 苏胜全. 澳门观音堂古树高山榕根腐病的治理[J]. 广东园林, 2001(1): 39–41.
[42] 黄华枝, 梁玉鑚, 夏聪, 吴绍伟, 冯爱卿, 何锐荣. 澳门公园植物病虫害发生危害现状调查[J]. 广东园林, 2009, 31(4): 35–37.
[43] 岑炳沾, 卢树洁. 南方古树腐朽菌的鉴别及治理[J]. 广东林业科技, 2011, 27(1): 1–7.
[44] 杨艳琴. 沈阳市区(二环路)行道绿地树木腐朽真菌的调查研究[J]. 中国林副特产, 2013(4): 76–78.
[45] 张慧蕾. 我国东南亚热带地区木材腐朽菌的调查研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学硕士学位论文, 2013.
[46] 林顺吉. 闽南地区木材腐朽菌的初步调查研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学硕士学位论文, 2014.
[47] 邓春英, 吴兴亮. 南方校园大型真菌多样性——以海南大学为例[J]. 贵州科学, 2014, 32(6): 11–15.
[48] 陈礼浪. 海南木麻黄木腐菌的多样性及病原木腐菌致病性研究[D]. 海口: 海南大学硕士学位论文, 2016.
[49] 程乐乐, 李增平,丁婧钰, 吴如慧, 柏睿. 海南9种棕榈科植物木腐菌的物种多样性及其与温湿度相关性分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018, 39(3): 534–539.
[50] Ding S, Hu H, Gu J D. Diversity, abundance, and distribution of wood-decay fungi in major parks of Hong Kong [J]. Forests, 2020, 11: 1030.
[51] 武英达, 满孝武, 员瑗, 戴玉成. 中国各省植物园中多孔菌种类、分布和组成[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 1–7.
[52] 杨华, 文娅, 王科,王爽, 佟岩, 靳馨. 北京公园树木腐朽病的发生现状调查研究[J/OL]. 中国森林病虫, https://doi.org/10.19688/j.cnki.issn1671–0886.20240019, 2024.
[53] 朱安红, 高悦, 杨占恩,吴可欣, 唐珂, 宋子坤, 马海霞. 海口地区大型真菌多样性分析与资源评价[J/OL]. 热带作物学报, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1019.S.20240510.1447.002, 2024.
[54] 戴玉成. 中国林木病原腐朽菌图志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.
[55] 戴玉成. 中国储木及建筑木材腐朽菌图志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
[56] 戴玉成, 崔宝凯. 海南大型木生真菌的多样性[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
[57] 李泰辉, 蒋谦才, 刑佳慧. 中山市大型真菌图鉴[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2021.
[58] 戴玉成. 云南木材腐朽真菌资源和多样性[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022.
[59] 香港特别行政区政府发展局绿化、园境及树木管理组. 香港市区树木常见的树木腐朽菌简介[M]. 香港: 香港特别行政区政府发展局, 2015.
[60] 傅春旭, 张东柱. 老树木材腐朽菌图鉴[M]. 台北: 台湾省林务局, 2009.
[61] 张劲蔼, 黄华枝, 毕可可, 孙龙华. 褐根病菌分子检测与生物防治研究进展[J]. 广东园林, 2016, 38(6): 74–77.
[62] 赵忠. 古树保护理论与技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021.
[63] Guglielmo F, Gonthier P, Garbelotto M, Nicolotti G. A PCR-based method for the identification of important wood rotting fungal taxa within Ganoderma, Inonotus s. l. and Phellinus s. l. [J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2008, 282(2): 228–37.
[64] Gonthier P, Guglielmo F, Sillo F, Giordano L, Garbelotto M. A molecular diagnostic assay for the detection and identification of wood decay fungi of conifers [J]. Forest Pathology, 2015, 45: 89–101.
[65] Zhang H, Ng T K, Lee K C, Leung Z W, Yau W F, Wong W S. Development and evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) as a preliminary diagnostic tool for brown root rot disease caused by Phellinus noxius (Corner) G. H. Cunningham in Hong Kong urban tree management [J]. Sustainability. 2022; 14(15): 9708.
[66] 孟国良, 曾培明, 王紫璎, 程冰, 叶丽云, 吴小平. 重伞灵芝线粒体基因组在灵芝种间鉴定中的应用[J]. 菌物学报, 2020, 39(1): 23–33.
[67] 戴玉成, 范龙飞, 陈佳佳, 吴翠萍, 武英达, 员瑗. 针叶树病原菌异担子菌属的物种多样性及相关检疫建议[J]. 菌物学报, 2021, 40(8): 1958–1964.
[68] Tan J Y, Zhang Z, Izzah H J, Fong Y K, Lee D, Mutwil M, Hong Y. Volatile-Based diagnosis for pathogenic wood-rot fungus Fulvifomes siamensis by electronic Nose (E-Nose) and solid- phase microextraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry [J]. Sensors, 2023, 23, 4538.
Outlines

/