Research articles

Picrasma quassioides Plus Trees Selection in Natural Forests from Guangxi

  • 黄华希,李晓亮,王雪雪,刘芳林,刘 秦,陈 荣
Expand
  • (1. College of Biological Science and Technology, Yili Normal University, Yining 835000, Xinjiang China; 2. Yining Agriculture and Rural Affairs Bureau, Yining 835000, Xinjiang China; 3. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Chemistry and Biotechnology of Agricultural Resources, Yulin Normal University, Yulin 537000, Guangxi China)

Received date: 2025-01-20

  Accepted date: 2025-04-09

  Online published: 2025-10-13

Abstract

Investigations were carried by means of visiting and comprehensive inspection, 8 counties that Pingxiang, Tiandeng, Pingguo, Bama, Donglan, Jingxi, Leye and Jinchengjiang where Picrasma quassioides natural forests concentrated were confirmed as tree selection region. Firstly, P. quassioides was selected based on quality, then the method of mean tree comparison was used to select 12 plus trees according with the standard of diameter, height, individual volume were respectively 25%, 15% and 100% higher than the average wood. Select 7 candidate plus trees based on the standards of 15%, 10%, and 50% higher than the average trees in terms of diameter, height, and individual volume. On this basis, according to statutory standards, the compliance of 19 plus trees or candidate plus trees was qualification assessment based on the total alkaloid content and 4,5-Dimethoxycanthin-6-one content as the limit indicator traits. Used the content of active ingredients such as 5-hydroxy-4-methoxycanthin-6-one, 4,5-Dimethoxycanthin-6-one, and total alkaloids as quality analysis indicators, 18 trees were selected, Among them, JCJ101, JCJ102, JCJ103, JCJ201, and JX101 were recommended as propagative material for high-yield and high-quality demonstration forests of P. quassioides.

Cite this article

黄华希,李晓亮,王雪雪,刘芳林,刘 秦,陈 荣 . Picrasma quassioides Plus Trees Selection in Natural Forests from Guangxi[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2025 , 54(4) : 452 -457 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2025.04.010

References

[1] 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志(第43卷第3分册) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1997: 7–12.
[2] 中国药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020: 209.
[3] 邓延秋, 赵立春, 唐红珍, 蔡少芳, 王静妮, 罗永秋, 张振伟. 苦木化学成分及生物活性研究进展[J]. 中成药, 2020, 42(5): 1291–1296.
[4] 隋明静, 陈小风, 吴峰洋, 崔嘉, 陈宝江, 姚浪群. 天然植物提取复方制剂对断奶仔猪生长性能、营养物质表观消化率及免疫力的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2020, 43(8): 46–50.
[5] 中国兽药典委员会. 中华人民共和国兽药典(二部)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2016: 287.
[6] 李剑强. 苦木汤对保育猪生长性能的影响[J]. 养猪, 2015(2): 31–32.
[7] 李国柱, 陈灏, 林广基. 中草药制剂苦木汤对仔猪生产性能的影响试验[J]. 广东畜牧兽医科技, 2014, 39(1): 13–15.
[8] 臧青民, 黄华希, 辛桂瑜, 覃兰, 郭艺鹏, 卢恩科, 陈荣, 章烨雯. 苦木提取物对肉鸡生长性能、屠宰性能、免疫功能及抗氧化性能的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2023 (15): 76-80.
[9] 国家中医药管理局编委会. 中华本草(第五册) [M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1999: 3839–3840.
[10] 曾赣林, 魏本柱, 宋瑞萍. 苦木资源现状与保护对策[J]. 江西林业科技, 2005(3): 44–55.
[11] 马丽莎. 四川苦木科植物资源及其开发利用[J]. 四川林业科技, 1997(4): 37–41.
[12] 李金花, 曾国芳, 臧青民, 张慧晔, 李海东, 陈荣. 苦树侧枝不同极性部位的抗氧化活性及对肺癌细胞A549的生长抑制作用[J]. 中国饲料, 2022(11): 42–48.
[13] 吴冲, 邓贵华, 林朝展, 祝晨蔯. 苦木成分分析及质量评价初步研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2014, 39(9): 1656–1659.
[14] 黄华希, 冯立新, 李金花, 张慧晔, 臧青民, 章烨雯, 陈荣. 苦木不同药用部位抗氧化活性研究[J]. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(15): 67–70.
[15] 李金花, 潘秀莲, 刘秦, 魏秋兰, 朱昌叁, 陈荣, 黄华希. 广西苦树群落类型划分及其物种多样性[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2023, 52(2): 135–142.
[16] 江西省药品监督管理局. 江西省中药材标准[S]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2014: 192–193.
[17] 中华人民共和国香港特别行政区卫生署. 香港中药材标准(第十期) [M]. 香港: 政府物流服务署印刷出版, 2020: 293–305.
[18] 林兰花. 云山青冈天然林分优树选择及母树林培育技术[J]. 林业勘察设计, 2023, 43(3): 84–87.
[19] 向华, 向文明, 向明. 我国用材林优树选择技术研究进展[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2021, 48(2): 89–96.
[20] 唐春风, 梁洁, 李金花, 张慧晔, 黄华希, 陈荣. 苦木不同部位生物碱含量的比较研究[J]. 饲料研究, 2023, 46(6): 71–74.
[21] 易宇阳, 赖正权, 石书江, 陈海明, 孔松芝, 黄思涵, 苏子仁. 苦木药材中3种有效成分的含量测定[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2012, 18(12): 71–74.
Outlines

/