以阴香Cinnamomum burmannii、山杜英Elaeocarpus sylvestris、铁冬青Ilex rotunda 3种常见园林树木幼苗为研究对象，对其形态特征和生物量分配进行测量评估及相关分析。结果表明，3种植物幼苗株高、地径的生长较为整齐，但其生物量表现不一；铁冬青的地下生物量显著高于其他两种树木(P＜0.05)；而阴香的地上生物量和总生物量最高，且与其他两种树木差异显著(P＜0.05)。三种树木幼苗茎质量比差异不显著；根质量比从高到低依次为铁冬青、山杜英、阴香，铁冬青显著高于山杜英和阴香(P＜0.05)；叶质量比与根质量比相反，且三者差异显著(P＜0.05)；体积指数、Dickson质量指数与树木幼苗生物量显著相关(P＜0.05)，其中又以Dickson质量指数相关性更强，可用于园林树木幼苗指标评估；地上干重与总生物量之间存在极显著相关性(P＜0.01)。
The morphological characteristics and biomass allocation of three species of landscape tree seedlings, Cinnamomum burmannii, Elaeocarpus sylvestris and Ilex rotunda, were measured and evaluated. The results showed that the shoot height and diameter of three plant seedlings were relatively uniform, but seedlings biomasses of three species of landscape tree were different. Ilex rotunda had a highest underground biomass, and significant difference compared to C. burmannii and E. sylvestris(P<0.05). While C. burmannii had a highest aboveground biomass and total biomass, and significant difference compared to I. rotunda and E. sylvestris(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between stem mass ratio of seedlings of 3 species, but root and leaf mass ratios were different. Root mass ratio of I. rotunda was significantly higher than E. sylvestris and C. burmannii. Leaf mass ratios of three plant seedlings were significantly different(P<0.05), C. burmannii was highest. Bulk index and Dickson quality index were significantly correlated with biomass(P<0.05), but Dickson quality index was more relevant to be used for evaluation of garden tree seedling, there was a highly significant correlation between aboveground dry biomass and total biomass(P<0.01).
[1] Tsakaldimi M, Ganatsas P, Jacobs D F. Prediction of planted seedling survival of five Mediterranean species based on initial seedling morphology[J]. New Forests, 2013,44(3): 327—339.
[2] Franco J A, Martínezsánchez J J, Fernández J A, Ba?ón S. Selection and nursery production of ornamental plants for landscaping and xerogardening in semi-arid environments[J]. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 2006,81(1): 3—17.
[3] 邱权,潘昕,李吉跃,王军辉,董蕾,马建伟,杜坤. 青藏高原20种灌木幼苗生物量分配、水分利用效率及叶片δ13C比较[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2014,29(4): 8—14.
[4] 宋于洋,胡晓静. 古尔班通古特沙漠不同生态类型梭梭地上生物量估算模型[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011,26(2): 31—37.
[5] 姚正阳,刘建军. 西安市4种城市绿化灌木单株生物量估算模型[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(1): 111—116.
[6] 罗永开,方精云,胡会峰. 山西芦芽山14种常见灌木生物量模型及生物量分配[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017,41(1): 115—125.
[7] 郭娜,刘剑秋. 植物生物量研究概述(综述)[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2011,40(2): 83—88.
[8] 杨昆,管东生. 森林林下植被生物量收获的样方选择和模型[J]. 生态学报, 2007,27(2): 705—714.
[9] 陈晓远,高志红,罗远培. 植物根冠关系[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2005,41(5): 6—13.
[10] 周鹏,翁殊斐,柯羽,韩付家. 6种园林花灌木幼苗生长及生物量的分配[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015,30(6): 134—138.
[11] 黄婷,张莹,吴承祯,洪伟,林勇明,黄树军. 育苗密度对千年桐幼苗叶片叶绿素荧光特性和高径比的影响[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2013,33(4): 310—315.
[12] 宋于洋,胡晓静. 古尔班通古特沙漠不同生态类型梭梭地上生物量估算模型[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011,26(2): 31—37.
[13] Binotto A F, Lucio A D, Lopes S J. Correlations between growth variables and the dickson quality index in forest seedlings[J]. Cerne, 2010,16(4): 457—464.
[14] 张绘芳,朱雅丽,地力夏提?包尔汉,高亚琪,丁程锋,王蕾. 阿尔泰山林区云杉和落叶松生物量分配格局研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,41(1): 203—208.
[15] 冯丽,张景光,张志山,郭群,李新荣. 腾格里沙漠人工固沙植被中油蒿的生长及生物量分配动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009,33(6): 1132—1139.
闽公网安备 35020602000789号