在元谋干热河谷冲沟发育典型的三个样区(沙地村、金雷村、苴林村)采集48条冲沟的植物样方数据和冲沟沟底的坡度数据，运用重要值方法对植被优势种进行判别和筛选，以灌木优势种和草本优势种为主要研究对象，探讨植被优势种与冲沟沟底坡度的关系。结果表明：(1)灌木优势种为车桑子Dodonaea viscosa和山合欢Albizia kalkora，重要值分别为0.486和0.342，占灌木总体的83%；草本优势种为扭黄茅Heteropogon contortus、孔颖草Bothriochloa pertusa和茅草Imperata cylindrica，重要值分别为0.386、0.140及0.196，占草本总体的72%。(2)除草本优势种中的茅草盖度与坡度相关性显著(P<0.05)外，样区冲沟沟底坡度与灌木优势种和草本优势种相关性均不显著(P>0.05)，表明在元谋干热河谷地区，冲沟沟底坡度对植被优势种生长状况影响较小。
With three typical plots (Shadi Village, Jinlei Village, and Julin Village) in the hot-dry valley of Yuanmou as sample areas, 48 plant ditch data about gullies and gully slope were collected, and important value methods were used, the dominant species of vegetation were discriminated and screened. The dominant species of shrubs and herbaceous were the main research objects. The relationship between dominant species of vegetation and gully slope was discussed. The results showed that: (1) The dominant species of shrubs were Dodonaea viscosa and Albizia kalkora, the important values were 0.486 and 0.342, respectively, accounting for 83% of the total shrubs. Herbaceous dominant species were Heteropogon contortus, Bothriochloa pertusa and Imperata cylindrica, the important values were 0.386, 0.140 and 0.196, respectively, accounting for 72% of the total herb. (2) Except for the significant correlation between the slope and coverage degree of I. cylindrica (P<0.05), there was no significant correlation between gully bottom slope and dominant species of shrubs or herbaceous dominant species (P>0.05). The results showed that in the dry-hot valley of Yuanmou area, the gully slope had little effect on growth of dominant species of vegetation.
[1] Meril? P, Malmivaara-L?ms? M, Spetz P, Stark S, Vierikko K, Derome J, Fritze H. Soil organic matter quality as a link between microbial community structure and vegetation composition along a successional gradient in a boreal forest[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2010,46(2): 259—267.
[2] 刘晓玲,王光美,于君宝,冉越男,管博,韩广轩,王安东,赵亚杰. 氮磷供应条件对黄河三角洲滨海湿地植物群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018(3): 801—809.
[3] 杜洁,巩如英. 北戴河滨海森林植物资源种类及群落结构调查分析[J]. 中国环境管理干部学院学报, 2017,27(6): 31—34.
[4] 江国华,褚群杰,张智勇,杨军,苏守香,吴泽民. 宣城市城区公园绿地植物群落结构的研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2018(1): 90—95.
[5] 从睿,张开文,伊贤贵. 黄山植物群落结构及其物种多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/32.1161.S.20170426.1639.010.html
[6] 王旭东. 城市绿地植物群落结构特征与优化调控研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学博士学位论文, 2016.
[7] 莫庭坤. 江门市植物群落结构、景观格局及其与部分环境因子的相关性研究[D]. 广州: 仲恺农业工程学院硕士学位论文, 2014.
[8] 吴云霄,李华军,董仕萍,王海洋. 重庆市公园7种植物群落结构对夏季微气候的改善效果[J]. 西部林业科学, 2007(2): 75—79.
[9] 龚雪伟,吕光辉. 艾比湖流域杜加依林荒漠植物群落多样性及优势种生态位[J]. 生物多样性, 2017,25(1): 34—45.
[10] 原野,赵中秋,白中科,王怀泉,徐志果,牛姝烨. 安太堡露天煤矿不同复垦模式下草本植物优势种生态位[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016,35(12): 3215—3222.
[11] 张桂萍,张峰,茹文明. 山西绵山植被木本植物优势种群种间关联[J]. 生态学杂志, 2006(3): 295—298.
[12] 李雪,付志鑫,李新,康璐,范亚文. 三江平原湿地——虎林地区夏季浮游植物群落结构特征[J]. 植物科学学报, 2018(1): 38—44.
[13] 李俊伟,朱长波,颉晓勇,郭永坚,陈素文,常华,张宁,曾林,胡瑞萍. 池塘分区养殖系统对水质和浮游植物群落结构的影响[J]. 生态科学, 2017,36(6): 114—124.
[14] 王晨,胡翠华,杜敏晴,刘守江. 元谋干热河谷冲沟发育阶段与植被优势种关系探讨[J]. 亚热带水土保持, 2017,29(2): 8—12.
[15] 罗君,周维,覃发超,邓青春,罗明良,胥晓,刘刚才,张斌,李国鸿. 元谋干热河谷冲沟区植被对微地形的响应[J]. 山地学报, 2012(5): 537—545.
[16] 张斌,史凯,刘春琼,艾南山,刘刚才,覃发超. 元谋干热河谷近50年分季节降水变化的DFA分析[J]. 地理科学, 2009,29(4): 561—566.
[17] 王育松,上官铁梁. 关于重要值计算方法的若干问题[J]. 山西大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,33(2): 312—316.
[18] 康永祥,岳军伟,雷瑞德. 陕北黄龙山辽东栎群落优势种群生态位研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2008,28(3): 574—581.
闽公网安备 35020602000789号