植物保护与栽培

铁皮石斛林下立体栽培比较研究

  • 梁琼芳 ,
  • 陈 庭
展开
  • (深圳市中国科学院仙湖植物园/深圳市南亚热带植物多样性重点实验室,广东 深圳 518004)
梁琼芳,工程师,从事园林植物栽培及应用研究。

收稿日期: 2018-04-04

  修回日期: 2018-05-03

  网络出版日期: 2018-06-30

基金资助

深圳市城市管理局科研基金项目(201413)

Comparative Study on Three-Dimensional Forest Cultivation of Dendrobium officinale

  • LIANG Qiong-fang ,
  • CHEN Ting
Expand
  • (Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Southern Subtropical Plant Diversity, Fairylake Botanical Garden, Shenzhen & Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518004, Guangdong China)

Received date: 2018-04-04

  Revised date: 2018-05-03

  Online published: 2018-06-30

摘要

选取种植方式、树体及其部位作为研究对象,对不同林下栽培模式下铁皮石斛Dendrobium officinale存活率、增殖系数及增重系数进行比较研究。结果表明,不同种植方式的铁皮石斛存活率大小依次为:悬挂式树段(98.55%)>树体(95.86%)>砖石(92.67%)>苗床(72.97%),悬挂式树段种植方式与其他三种方式均存在显著差异;而不同树的铁皮石斛存活率大小依次为:树菠萝(96.43%)>龙眼(96.22%)>杧果(95.37%)>荔枝(93.54%)>马尾松(32.93%),前三种树与其他树存在显著差异;不同部位则以树杈部存活率(86.89%)最高。比较不同种植方式的铁皮石斛增殖与增重系数,附生种植方式两指标均显著高于林下苗床种植方式,附生种植方式中又以悬挂式树段种植方式的系数值最高,其三年后增殖系数与增重系数分别为3.50和4.55,并与其他附生方式均存在显著差异。因此,在亚热带林下立体栽培模式下,铁皮石斛的种植应以悬挂式树段种植方式为主,并充分利用常绿阔叶类乔木树种及砖石类等载体进行附生种植。

本文引用格式

梁琼芳 , 陈 庭 . 铁皮石斛林下立体栽培比较研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2018 , 47(02) : 181 -186 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2018.02.017

Abstract

A comparative study about the survival rate, multiplication coefficients(MCF) and weight coefficient(WCF) of Dendrobium officinale under three-dimensional forest cultivations with planting pattern, the tree body and its parts as research object was carried out. The results showed that the survival rate of D. officinale under different planting patterns as follows: suspended tree segment (STE)(98.55%)> tree body(95.86%)> rock(92.67%)> seedbed (72.97%), and there was a significant difference between STE and other planting patterns. The survival rate of D. officinale in different trees was Artocarpus heterophyllus(96.43%)> Dimocarpus longan (96.22%)> Mangifera indica(95.37%) > Litchi chinensis(93.54%)> Pinus massoniana(32.93%), and there was a significant difference between previous three trees and others. The survival rate of the fork was the highest(86.89%) in different tree parts. The comparison of MCF and WCF under different planting modes found that the two coefficients of the epiphytic types were higher than seedbed, and significant difference existed between them. The coefficients of STE were the highest in all epiphytic types(MCF=3.50 and WCF=4.55 after three years), and there was significant difference from other epiphytic types. Therefore, the cultivation of D. officinale should mainly use STE pattern, and make the most of evergreen broad-leaved arbor and rock as the carrier to cultivate in stereo planting pattern.

参考文献

[1] 中国科学院中国植物志编委会. 中国植物志(第19卷)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996: 117.
[2] 李虹阳. 铁皮石斛种质资源评价及低温处理对鲜条品质的影响[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学专业硕士学位论文, 2016.
[3] Huang K S, Li Y R, Tao S C, Wei G, Huang Y C, Chen D F, Wu C F. Purification, characterization and biological activity of polysaccharides from Dendrobium officinale[J]. Molecules, 2016,21(701): 1—17.
[4] 杨洋. 不同种植方式铁皮石斛品质对比研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学硕士学位论文, 2016.
[5] 陈庭,张琪,王运华,史正军,罗其章,梁琼芳,谢成恒,戴耀良. 一种铁皮石斛的林下立体栽培法: 中国, 201410386731.4[P]. 2016-04-06.
[6] 崔之益,肖玉,杨曾奖,徐大平,张宁南,刘小金,洪舟. 铁皮石斛种植技术体系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017,36(3): 878—884.
[7] 罗仲春,罗斯丽,罗毅波. 铁皮石斛原生态栽培技术[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2013: 33—36.
[8] 张之鹏. 不同栽培方式对铁皮石斛生长及有效成分的影响[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学硕士学位论文, 2016.
[9] 杨旺利. 生态林内人工栽培铁皮石斛试验研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2012,39(1): 48—52.
[10] 张华通,孙同高,林晓萍,张莹,王洪峰. 铁皮石斛种子组织培养研究[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2016,32(6): 40—43.
[11] 陈淑钦. 不同栽培模式下铁皮石斛生长特性及活性物质研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学硕士学位论文, 2016.
[12] 斯金平,董洪秀,廖新艳,朱玉球,李晖. 一种铁皮石斛立体栽培方法的研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2014,39(23): 4576—4579.
[13] 罗在柒,杨洋,吴仕燕. 不同栽培方式铁皮石斛的产量与品质分析[J]. 贵州林业科技, 2016,44(3): 14—18.
[14] 袁颖丹,李志,胡冬南,郭晓敏. 铁皮石斛仿生栽培越冬效果研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017,45(9): 112—114.
[15] 李晖. 铁皮石斛立体栽培技术研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学专业硕士学位论文, 2014.
文章导航

/

〈 〉