以六种叶状体苔藓为材料，通过测定叶绿素含量及实际光合量子产量，检验叶状体苔藓植物叶绿素含量与实际光合量子产量之间的关系。结果表明，六种叶状体苔藓总叶绿素含量中值6.06 mg·g-1，其中花叶溪苔Pellia endiviifolia最高(9.72 mg·g-1)，楔瓣地钱Marchantia emarginata最低(4.46 mg·g-1)；叶绿素a/b值变化范围1.61～2.04，林氏黄角苔Phaeoceros carolinianus最高，毛地钱Dumortiera hirsuta最低；紫背苔Plagiochasma rupestre、楔瓣地钱和蛇苔Conocephalum conicum实际光合量子产量明显高于毛地钱、花叶溪苔和林氏黄角苔。叶状体苔藓叶绿素含量与其实际光合量子产量之间并非简单的线性关系，气室结构及生境可能影响其实际光合效率。这一结论进一步丰富了苔藓植物对光照的生态适应理论。
张 伟
,
高雪笛
,
丁晓璐
,
孙莉玮
,
庄李婕
,
王竞挺
,
彭 涛
,
刘行行
,
唐录艳
. 六种叶状体苔藓植物叶绿素含量和光合效率研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2018
, 47(04)
: 312
-316
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2018.04.002
Using six thalloid bryophytes as materials, the corresponding relationship between chlorophyll content and actual photosynthetic quantum yield was determined. Results showed that the median value of total chlorophyll content of six species was 6.06 mg·g-1, with the highest value of 9.72 mg·g-1 in Pellia endiviifolia and the lowest of 4.46 mg·g-1 in Marchantia emarginata; the ratio of chlorophyll a/b ranged from 1.61 to 2.04, with the highest value in Phaeoceros carolinianus and the lowest in Dumortiera hirsuta; the actual photosynthetic quantum yields of three species, i.e. Plagiochasma rupestre, Marchantia emarginata and Conocephalum conicum, were significantly higher than those of Dumortiera hirsuta, Pellia endiviifolia and Phaeoceros carolinianus. This study indicated that there was no simple linear relationship between chlorophyll content and actual photosynthetic quantum yield in thalloid bryophytes. Habitats and air chamber of gametophytes may affect their actual photosynthetic quantum yield, which further enriches the ecological adaptation theory of bryophytes to light.
[1] 吴鹏程. 苔藓植物生物学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998: 131—134.
[2] Lenton T M, Dahl T W, Daines S J, Mills B J W, Ozaki K, Saltzman M R, Porada P. Earliest land plants created modern levels of atmospheric oxygen[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2016,113(35): 9704—9709.
[3] Martin C E. Chlorophyll a/b rations of eleven North Carolina mosses[J]. Bryologist, 1980,83(1): 84—87.
[4] Marschall M, Proctor M C F. Are bryophytes shade plants? Photosynthetic light responses and proportions of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total carotenoids[J]. Annals of Botany, 2004,94(4): 593—603.
[5] Martin C E, Churchill S P. Chlorophyll concentrations and a/b ratios in mosses collected from exposed and shaded habitats in Kansas[J]. Journal of Bryology, 1982,12(4): 297—304.
[6] Kershaw K A, Webber M R. Seasonal changes in the chlorophyll content and quantum efficiency of the moss Brachithecium rutabulum[J]. Journal of Bryology, 1986,14(2): 151—158.
[7] Mccall K K, Martin C E. Chlorophyll concentrations and photosynthesis in three forest understory mosses in Northeastern Kansas[J]. Bryologist, 1991,94(1): 25—29.
[8] 高谦,吴玉环. 中国苔纲和角苔纲植物属志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 3—7.
[9] 韩留福,王秀云,代娜. 4种苔类植物叶状体的比较解剖学研究[J]. 河北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2004,28(3): 293—295.
[10] Glime J M. Bryophyte Ecology(Vol. 1): Physiological Ecology[EB/OL]. Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists, 2007, 9—24. http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/.
[11] 李小方,张志良. 植物生理学实验指导(第5版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2016: 50—52.
[12] 杜荣骞. 生物统计学(第2版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003: 113—115.
[13] Vanderpoorten A, Goffinet B. Introduction to Bryophytes[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010: 195—202.
[14] Müller P, Li X P, Niyogi K K. Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy[J]. Plant Physiology, 2001,125(4): 1558—1566.
[15] Mishler B D, Oliver M J. Gametophytic phenology of Tortula ruralis, a desiccation-tolerant moss, in the organ mountains of southern New Mexico[J]. Bryologist, 1991,94(2): 143—153.
[16] 姜炎彬,邵小明. 苔藓植物分布及其物种多样性的研究评述[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 2010,28(3): 385—390.
[17] Hasegawa J. Taxonomical studies on Asian anthocerotae. IV. A revision of the genera Anthoceros, Phaeoceros and Folioceros in Japan[J]. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 1984,57: 241—272.
[18] 贾渝,何思. 中国生物物种名录(第一卷): 苔藓植物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
[19] 吴德邻,张力. 广东苔藓志[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2013.
闽公网安备 35020602000789号