植物生态与资源分类

仁化县野生白毛茶群落特征及保护对策

  • 刘逸嵘 ,
  • 刘 佳 ,
  • 黄燕双 ,
  • 陈再雄 ,
  • 赵万义 ,
  • 凡 强 ,
  • 廖文波
展开
  • (1.有害生物控制与资源利用国家重点实验室/广东省热带亚热带植物资源重点实验室/中山大学生命科学学院,广东 广州 510275;2.广东韶关丹霞山国家级自然保护区管理局,广东 韶关 512300)
刘逸嵘,硕士研究生,从事植物学研究。

收稿日期: 2018-10-16

  修回日期: 2018-12-16

  网络出版日期: 2019-03-30

基金资助

广东省公益研究与能力建设专项资金(2015A030302020);第四次全国中药资源普查(20147002);广东省高等教育质量工程和教学改革项目(2016-2018)

Community Characteristics and Protection Measures of Wild Camellia sinensis var. pubilimba in Renhua County

  • LIU Yi-rong ,
  • LIU Jia ,
  • HUANG Yan-shuang ,
  • CHEN Zai-xiong ,
  • ZHAO Wan-yi ,
  • FAN Qiang ,
  • LIAO Wen-bo
Expand
  • (1.State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Resources/School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong China; 2.Guangdong Shaoguan Danxia National Nature Reserve Administration, Shaoguan 512300, Guangdong China)

Received date: 2018-10-16

  Revised date: 2018-12-16

  Online published: 2019-03-30

摘要

以广东仁化县董塘镇及红山镇5个分布有野生白毛茶Camellia sinensis var. pubilimba的生存群落为对象,开展样方调查及群落生态学分析,以期明确野生白毛茶的生长状况及保护对策。结果表明:(1) 5个有野生白毛茶分布的群落,共分布有维管植物177种,隶属于63科119属,其中蕨类植物13科17属21种,被子植物49科101属155种;(2) 白毛茶野生种群分布于毛竹Phyllostachys heterocycla、杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata群落演替而成的次生林,群落上层以毛竹、杉木、华润楠Machilus chinensis、罗浮柿Diospyros morrisiana为优势种,灌木层以白毛茶、红背山麻杆Alchornea trewioides、绒毛山胡椒Lindera nacusua、八角枫Alangium chinense为优势种,草本层以乌毛蕨Blechnum orientale、蔓生莠竹Microstegium fasciculatum、三叶崖爬藤Tetrastigma hemsleyanum等占优势;(3) 除次生林外,其余群落中草本层Simpson指数、Shannon-wiener指数及均匀度均高于乔木层及灌木层,这可能是自然演替进程与人类砍伐活动综合作用的结果;(4) 野生白毛茶更适合处于中度干扰的次生林中,较为湿润的阳坡利于其发展;(5) 野生白毛茶数量虽多,共258株,却均为小苗,且生长状况并不理想,需及时采取有效的保护措施就地保护、适度干扰,同时加强民众教育保护现有野生资源,扩大野生种群调查范围,兼顾回归实验。

本文引用格式

刘逸嵘 , 刘 佳 , 黄燕双 , 陈再雄 , 赵万义 , 凡 强 , 廖文波 . 仁化县野生白毛茶群落特征及保护对策[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2019 , 48(01) : 36 -44 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2019.01.008

Abstract

Four artificial bamboo communities and one virgin community of Camellia sinensis var. pubilimba in Renhua county, Guangdong province were studied by quadrate investigation and community ecology analysis. The results showed that: (1) In 5 wild Camellia sinensis communities, there were 177 species of vascular plants, belonging to 119 genera in 63 families, including 21 species of pteridophytes belonging to 17 genera in 13 families, and 155 species of seed plants belonging to 101 genera in 49 families. (2) The dominant species in the tree layer were Phyllostachys heterocycle & Cunninghamia lanceolate (artificial bamboo community) or Machilus chinensis & Luculia gratissima (virgin community); the dominant species in the shrub layer were Camellia sinensis var. pubilimba, Alchornea trewioides, Lindera nacusua; The dominant species in the herb layer were Blechnum orientale, Microstegium fasciculatum, Tetrastigma hemsleyanum. (3) In addition to the secondary forests, Simpson index, Shannon-wiener index and evenness of herb layer in other communities were higher than those of tree layer and shrub layer, which may be the result of the combined action of natural succession process and human logging activity. (4) Wild Camellia sinensis var. pubilimba was more suitable for secondary forest under moderate disturbance. The relatively wet sunny slope was conducive to its development. (5) There were 258 wild Camellia sinensis var. pubilimba strains in 5 communities, but they were all seedlings, and the growth condition was not very well. Effective protection and moderate interference should be taken, meanwhile, the public education should be carried out to protect the existing wild resources.

参考文献

[1] 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志(第49卷第3分册) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
[2] 李道成,王金焕. 浅谈仁化白毛茶品种资源的保护和开发[J]. 广东茶业, 2006(5): 13—15.
[3] 廖配霞. 浅谈仁化县红山镇白毛茶的发展现状[J]. 山西农经, 2017(6): 70.
[4] 《广东茶业》编辑部. 仁化白毛茶获批国家地理标志保护产品[J]. 广东茶业, 2014(4): 39.
[5] 乔小燕,吴华玲,韩雪文,王曦,卓敏,邵燕华,谢汉茂,陈栋. 仁化白毛茶生化成分与成品白茶品质的相关性研究[J]. 核农学报, 2015,29(12): 2327—2333.
[6] 黎星辉,施兆鹏,刘春林,罗军武,沈程文,龚志华. 云南大叶茶与汝城白毛茶杂交后代的RAPD亲子鉴定[J]. 茶叶科学, 2001(2): 99—102.
[7] 卓敏,乔小燕,操君喜,吴华玲,韩雪文,陈栋,李助明,谢汉茂. 丹霞系列白毛茶新品种(系)加工白茶的感官品质比较[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013,40(16): 98—100.
[8] 谭少波,王小云,文兆明. 广西南山白毛茶提纯复壮技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2012(8): 95.
[9] 谢春平,方彦,方炎明. 不同地区乌冈栎群落木本植物区系分析[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2011,46(3): 74—82.
[10] 王伯荪,余世孝,彭少麟. 植物群落学实验手册[M]. 广州: 广东高等教育出版社, 1996: 1—56.
[11] 吴征镒. 中国种子植物属的分布区类型[J]. 云南植物研究, 1991(S4): 1—39.
[12] 颜玉娟,赵虎,杨倩,谢碧霞. 湖南阳明山毛竹林群落特征[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2010,29(3): 375—380.
[13] Connell J H. Diversity in tropical rain forest and coral reefs[J]. Science, 1978,199(4335): 1302—1310.
[14] Hubbell S P, Foster R B, O’Brien S T, Harms K E, Condit R, Wechsler B, Wright S J, de Lao S L. Light gap disturbance, recruitment limitation and tree diversity in a Neotropical forest[J]. Science, 1999,283(5401): 554—557.
[15] 郭文霞,牛树奎,张彦龙,李艳霞,笪志祥. 经营强度对毛竹林植物多样性的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2009,32(4): 46—52.
[16] 彭志,方伟,桂仁意,高培军,李国栋,何云核. 安徽省毛竹林下植物物种多样性的研究[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 2011,30(4): 52—56.
[17] 方茹意,吴炜,鲁翔,周柳江,钟意,桂仁意. 不同强度人为干扰对毛竹林植物多样性的影响[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2017,15(6): 1—5.
文章导航

/

〈 〉