采用盆栽控水干旱法模拟干旱逆境，对1年生木棉(Bombax ceiba)盆栽苗进行不同程度的胁迫处理，测定干旱胁迫时其叶片叶绿素SPAD值和荧光参数动态变化。结果表明，干旱胁迫下，木棉叶片叶绿素相对含量逐渐降低；初始荧光(Fo)随着干旱程度的加剧而呈上升趋势，而最大荧光(Fm)、潜在光化学效率(Fv /Fo)、最大光化学效率(Fv /Fm)、光化学淬灭系数(qP)和表观光合电子传递速率(ETR)下降，在中度和重度干旱胁迫时差异显著(P＜0.05)；非光化学淬灭系数(NPQ)变化不显著。干旱胁迫导致木棉植株出现光抑制，植株可通过降低光化学淬灭、增加热耗散的形式增强对干旱的适应能力。
Four different gradients of drought stress were carried out on one-year-old seedlings of Bombax ceiba by potted simulation drought. The Chlorophyll SPAD value and fluorescence parameters in leaves of seedlings were measured. The results showed that the SPAD reduced slowly with the degree of drought stress increasing, the parameters of initial fluorescence (Fo) showed a rising trend, while maximum fluorescence (Fm), potential activities of PSⅡ (Fv /Fo), maximum photochemical efficiency of PSⅡ (Fv /Fm), photochemical quenching (qP) and relative photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR) decreased, and they had significant difference under moderate and severe drought stress from slight drought stress and control (P<0.05). But non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) change was not significant among these treatments. With the drought stress increased, the photo-inhibition appeared, B. ceiba could improve adaptability by reducing photochemical quenching coefficient and improving thermal dissipation.
[1] 王婷,谌志刚,何溪澄. 21世纪以来广州强降水的若干变化特征[J]. 广东气象, 2020,42(5): 15–18.
[2] Zhang S R. A discussion on chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters and their significance[J]. Chinese Bulletin Botany, 1999,16(4): 444–448.
[3] 白晶晶,吴俊文,李吉跃,何茜,邱权,潘昕. 干旱胁迫对2种速生树种叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2015,36(1): 85–90.
[4] Banks J M. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool to identify drought stress in acer genotypes[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2018,155: 118–127.
[5] 汤飞洋,金荷仙,唐宇力. 不同程度干旱胁迫对4个杜鹃品种叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2017,32(5): 64–68,108.
[6] 王祁,陈昆,石红梅,孙喜云. 干旱胁迫对甜高粱光合特性、叶绿素荧光、SPAD及根系活力的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2020,26(12): 18–22.
[7] 谢美华,李雪玲,杨海燕,王振吉,范树国. 干旱胁迫对不同玉米品种幼苗叶片SPAD值影响的研究[J]. 楚雄师范学院学报, 2014,29(6): 32–35,2.
[8] 张仁和,郑友军,马国胜,张兴华,路海东,史俊通,薛吉全. 干旱胁迫对玉米苗期叶片光合作用和保护酶的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31 (5): 1303–1311.
[9] 孙永江,杜远鹏,翟衡. 高温胁迫下不同光强对‘赤霞珠’葡萄PSII活性及恢复的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014,50(8): 1209–1215.
[10] 史彦江,罗青红,宋锋惠,俞涛,寇云玲. 高温胁迫对新疆榛光合参数和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012,23(9): 2477–2482.
[11] 孙志勇,季孔庶. 干旱胁迫对4个杂交鹅掌楸无性系叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010,25(4): 35–39.
[12] Hendrickson L, Furbank R T, Chow W S. A simple alternative approach to assessing the fate of absorbed light energy using chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 2004,82(1): 73–81
[13] 高蕾,刘丽君,董守坤,祖伟,孙聪姝. 干旱胁迫对大豆幼苗叶片生理生化特性的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2009,40(8): 1–4.
[14] 宋丽萍,蔡体久,喻晓丽. 水分胁迫对刺五加幼苗光合生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2007,5(2): 91–95.
[15] 李泽,谭晓风,卢锟,张琳,龙洪旭,吕佳斌,林青. 干旱胁迫对两种油桐幼苗生长、气体交换及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(5): 1515–1524.
[16] 里程辉,于辉,吕德国,刘志,王宏,于年文,王杰,张秀美,李宏建,宋哲. 干湿交替下不同中间砧对岳冠苹果叶片光合特性及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021,49(2): 108–114.
[17] Hefer G M . Photoinhibition and light–dependent turnover of the D1 reaction–centre polypeptide of photosystem Ⅱ are enhanced by mineral-stress conditions[J]. Planta, 1994,193(2): 290–299.
[18] 卜令铎,张仁和,常宇,薛吉全,韩苗苗. 苗期玉米叶片光合特性对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2010,30(5): 1184–1191.
[19] 李娟,彭镇华,高健,陈媛文. 干旱胁迫下黄条金刚竹的光合和叶绿素荧光特性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011,22(6): 1395–1402.
[20] 谌端玉,欧静,王丽娟,张仁嫒. 干旱胁迫对接种ERM真菌桃叶杜鹃幼苗叶绿素含量及荧光参数的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2016,47(7): 1164–1170.
[21] 高洁,叶洪刚,杨荣喜. 攀枝花干热河谷14个树种的耐旱性研究[J]. 西南林学院学报, 1996,16(3): 135–139.
闽公网安备 35020602000789号