植物生态与资源分类

深圳杨梅坑山地植物群落演替动态

  • 雷谨蔓 ,
  • 黄玉源 ,
  • 孙莹芳 ,
  • 杨志明 ,
  • 余欣繁 ,
  • 孙双双
展开
  • (1.仲恺农业工程学院园艺园林学院,广东 广州 510632;2.深圳市环境监测中心站,广东 深圳 518120;3.生态环境部华南环境科学研究所,广东 广州 510530)

收稿日期: 2021-06-18

  修回日期: 2021-07-28

  网络出版日期: 2021-08-30

基金资助

深圳市国家环境科学观测研究站、深圳市环境监测中心站科技项目(D119201A7)

Succession Dynamics of Plant Community in Yangmeikeng Mountain, Shenzhen

  • LEI Jin-man ,
  • HUANG Yu-yuan ,
  • SUN Ying-fang ,
  • YANG Zhi-ming ,
  • YU Xin-fan ,
  • SUN Shuang-shuang
Expand
  • (1.College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong China; 2.Shenzhen Environmental Monitoring Center Station, Shenzhen 518120, Guangdong China; 3.South China Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou 510530, Guangdong China)

Received date: 2021-06-18

  Revised date: 2021-07-28

  Online published: 2021-08-30

摘要

以深圳市杨梅坑山地两个植物群落为调查对象,分析其物种组成、物种多样性特征、重要值的变化,探讨不同阶段植物群落的演替动态规律。结果表明,两个植物群落经过7年演替后,植物群落的丰富度有所增加,且种类组成出现明显差异,两个植物群落在不同时期所呈现的自然景观不一样。群落科、属、种的数量差异明显。原鸭脚木-九节-铁线蕨群落2013年共有26科36属39种,2018年共有19科29属30种,2019年共有32科51属61种;原绒毛润楠-瓜馥木-团羽铁线蕨群落2013年共有25科30属33种,2018年共有24科33属33种,2019年共有42科67属83种。两个植物群落乔木层、灌木层、草本层三个层次的物种多样性指数和Pielou均匀度指数几乎都呈先下降再上升的趋势。演替系列中,乔木层、灌木层和草本层的物种组成均表现出耐荫种替代非耐荫种的趋势,且植物群落的层次由简单趋向复杂。

本文引用格式

雷谨蔓 , 黄玉源 , 孙莹芳 , 杨志明 , 余欣繁 , 孙双双 . 深圳杨梅坑山地植物群落演替动态[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2021 , 50(04) : 278 -289 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2021.04.007

Abstract

Taking two plant communities in Yangmeikeng mountain in Shenzhen as the survey object, the changes of species composition, species diversity characteristics and important values of the community were analyzed, and the succession dynamic pattern of plant community in different stages was discussed. The results showed that after 7 years of succession, the richness of the two plant communities increased, and the species composition in the two plant communities differ significantly. The natural landscapes of the two plant communities are also different in different periods. In the community family, genus, species of the quantitative composition, the difference is obvious. The original Schefflera octophylla–Psychotria–Adiantum capillus-veneris community was composed of 26 families, 36 genera, 39 species in 2013, and 19 families, 29 genera, 30 species in 2018, and a total of 32 families, 51 genera, 61 species in 2019; the original Machilus velutina–Fissistigma oldhamii–Adiantum capillus-junonis community was composed of 25 families 30 genera 33 species in 2013, a total of 24 families 33 genera 33 species in 2018, and a total of 42 families 67 genera 83 species in 2019. The species diversity index and Pielou evenness index of tree layers, shrub layers and herbaceous layers in both plant communities almost decreased first and then increased. The species composition of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous layers in the succession series showed the tendency of shade-tolerant species to replace shaded-intolerant species, and the hierarchy of plant community changes from simple to complex.

参考文献

[1] 杨小波. 植物群落演替的生理生态机理研究的现状和展望[J]. 海南大学学报(自然科学版), 1997(2): 147??–152. [2] 杨晓渊,马丽,张中华,张骞,郭婧,周秉荣,邓艳芳,汪新川,王芳,佘延娣,周华坤. 高寒草甸植物群落生长发育特征与气候因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(9): 3689–3700. [3] 郑远长. 贡嘎山区主要植物群落分布与气候的关系[J]. 山地研究, 1994(4): 201–206. [4] 唐志红,尉秋实,刘虎俊,姜生秀,何芳兰,张莹花,王芳琳,张裕年,赵赫然,赵鹏. 祁连山东段高寒植被群落特征及其与地形气候因子关系研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(1): 223–232. [5] 张明月,刘楠楠,刘佳,王蕾,廖文波. 湖南大围山和八面山香果树种群的年龄结构和演替动态比较[J]. 西北植物学报, 2017,37(8): 1603–1615. [6] 郑俊鸣,方笑,朱雪平,朱丹丹,邓传远. 平潭大屿岛植物资源及其多样性研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2016, 43(4): 640–645. [7] 庄树宏,王克明,陈礼学. 昆嵛山老杨坟阳坡与阴坡半天然植被植物群落生态学特性的初步研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1999(3): 47–58. [8] 王俊峰,郑小贤. 福建三明常绿阔叶次生林物种多样性及群落演替[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015,30(5): 39–45. [9] 梁军,孙志强,朱彦鹏,张星耀,于善栋,张英军,杨晓燕,唐晓娟. 昆嵛山天然林13年演替动态——生物多样性变化、物种周转与食叶害虫的短期干扰[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2011,31(1): 9–17. [10] 黄丽霞. 人为干扰对杨梅和毛竹林分空间结构和物种多样性的影响[D]. 浙江林学院, 2009: 1–46. [11] 蒋呈曦. 深圳杨梅坑风景区滨海植物群落结构及景观评价研究[D]. 仲恺农业工程学院, 2018: 8 [12] 高贤明,黄建辉,万师强,陈灵芝. 秦岭太白山弃耕地植物群落演替的生态学研究Ⅱ演替系列的群落α多样性特征[J]. 生态学报, 1997(6): 57–63. [13] 黄金燕,周世强,谭迎春,周小平,王鹏彦,张和民. 卧龙自然保护区大熊猫栖息地植物群落多样性研究: 丰富度、物种多样性指数和均匀度[J]. 林业科学, 2007(3): 73–78. [14] 朱彪,陈安平,刘增力,李光照,方精云. 广西猫儿山植物群落物种组成、群落结构及树种多样性的垂直分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2004 (1): 44–52. [15] 何东进,洪滔,胡海清,王英姿,刘勇生,范圣锋. 武夷山风景名胜区不同森林景观物种多样性特征研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2007(2): 9–13. [16] Turner B L, Wells A, Andersen K M, Condron L M. Patterns of tree community composition along a coastal dune chronosequence in lowland temperate rain forest in New Zealand[J]. Plant Ecology, 2012,213(10): 1525–1541.. [17] Grobler C H, Bredenkamp G J, Brown L R. Natural woodland vegetation and plant species richness of the urban open spaces in Gauteng, South Africa[J]. Koedoe, 2002,45(1): 19–31. [18] Zhang J, Dong Y. Factors affecting species diversity of plant communities and the restoration process in the loess area of China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2009,36(3): 345–350. [19] 黄玉源,余欣繁,梁鸿,招康赛,卢云鹤,陈永恒,刘念,杨立君,董安强,明珠,赖标汶. 深圳莲花山植被组成及植物多样性研究[J]. 农业研究与应用, 2016(2): 18–32. [20] 黄玉源,招康赛,杨丽君,等. 深圳山地植物群落结构与植物多样性[M]//北京: 科学出版社, 2017. [21] 黄玉源,余欣繁,陈志洁,等. 深圳市城区植被生态调查研究[R]. 深圳: 深圳市环境监测中心站, 仲恺农业工程学院, 2018. [22] 刘永兵,张春禹,江源. 半干旱区路域边坡生态恢复初期土壤植被演替研究[J]. 西部交通科技, 2013(9): 10–14. [23] 何建源. 武夷山自然保护区米槠群落物种多样性研究[J]. 厦门大学学报(自然科学版), 2005,(S1): 7–10. [24] Pascarella J B, Aide T M, Serrano M I, Zimmerman J K. Land–use history and forest regeneration in the Cayey Mountains, Puerto Rico[J]. Ecosystems, 2000,3: 217–228. [25] Chazdon R L. Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2003,6(1): 51–71. [26] 缪宁,刘世荣,史作民,马姜明,王晖. 强度干扰后退化森林生态系统中保留木的生态效应研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(13): 3889–3897. [27] Holl K D. Factors limiting tropical rain forest regeneration in abandoned pasture: seed rain, seed germination, microclimate, and soil[J]. Biotropica, 1999,31(2): 229–242. [28] 黄玉源,余欣繁,招康赛,杨立君,梁鸿,卢云鹤,王贺银,刘浩,明珠,刘念,周志彬. 深圳小南山与应人石山地植物多样性比较研究[J]. 广西植物, 2016,36(7): 795–805. [29] 史作民,刘世荣,程瑞梅. 宝天曼地区栓皮栎林恢复过程中高等植物物种多样性变化[J]. 植物生态学报,1998,(5): 32–38. [30] 朱宏光,李燕群,温远光,梁宏温,林建勇,农友. 特大冰冻灾害后大明山常绿阔叶林结构及物种多样性动态[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(19): 5571–5577. [31] 缪宁,周珠丽,史作民,冯秋红. 岷江冷杉林皆伐后次生群落结构和物种多样性的演替动态[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(13): 3661–3671. [32] 郑心炫,张增可,林华贞,林欣,王齐,黄柳菁. 平潭岛不同演替阶段植被群落物种多样性特征[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019(3): 66–73. [33] 张艳丽,李智勇,杨军,胡译文,张志永,叶兵. 杭州城市绿地群落结构及植物多样性[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2013,41(11): 25–30. [34] 何斌,李青,刘勇. 黔西北地区不同演替阶段植物群落结构与物种多样性特征[J]. 广西植物, 2019,39(8): 1029–1038. [35] Cain M D, Shelton M G. Secondary forest succession following reproduction cutting on the Upper Coastal Plain of southeastern Arkansas, USA[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001,146(1): 223–238 . [36] 朱育锋,肖智华,彭晚霞,杜虎,宋敏,刘永贤. 广西不同龄级桉树人工林植物多样性和群落结构动态变化特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018,38(12): 38–44.
文章导航

/

〈 〉