为了揭示喀斯特石漠化地区苔藓植物的物种多样性，通过野外实地调查对贵州喀斯特地区不同程度石漠化区域苔藓植物进行研究。结果表明，苔藓的科、属、种数量随着石漠化程度加剧而下降，其中，强度石漠化的科数最少且显著低于其他三种石漠化类型，比潜在、轻度、中度石漠化地区苔藓科数分别降低70.00%、57.14%、33.33%；轻度石漠化地区的真藓科、青藓科、丛藓科、曲尾藓科等包含属数较多，占总属数34.62%；Shannon-Wiener指数和Simpson指数变化基本一致，随石漠化程度加剧而下降，其中苔藓植物在潜在石漠化地区Shannon-Wiener指数为1.9393，高于其他三种石漠化区域，比强度石漠化区高43.97%，Simpson指数以轻度石漠化过渡到中度石漠化地区物种丰富度下降最快，下降26.73%；潜在石漠化区较其他三个区域拥有更高的苔藓数量。说明苔藓植物的分布和石漠化程度密切相关，随着石漠化程度加重，苔藓植物的科、属、种总数均有不同程度下降。
In order to reveal the species diversity of bryophytes in karst rocky desertification areas, the field investigation on mosses in karst areas with different degrees of rocky desertification from Guizhou province were carried out. The main research results were as follows. Along with the increase of rocky desertification degree, the number of bryophyte family, genus and species declined. Among them, the number of mosses families of intense rocky desertification was the least and significantly lower than those of other three types of rocky desertification areas. The number of families in intensity rocky desertification areas was lesser than those of potential, mild, moderate rocky desertification, reduced 70.00%, 57.14%, 33.33%, respectively. Bryaceae, Brachytheciaceae, Pottiaceae and Dicranaceae were the dominant families in mild rocky desertification in terms of the number of subordinate genus, which accounted for the total number 34.62%. Shannon-Wiener and Simpson indices were basically decreased with the intensification of rocky desertification. The Shannon-Wiener index of bryophyte in the potential rocky desertification area was 1.9393, higher than the other three rocky desertification areas was 43.97%, higher than the other three rocky desertification areas. Simpson index from mild to moderate rocky desertification decreased fastest by 26.73%. The amount of moss in potential rocky desertification was higher than that in the other three areas.?The results showed that the amount of mosses was closely related to the degree of rocky desertification. With the increase of the degree of rocky desertification, the total number of families, genera and species of bryophytes decreased to different degrees.
[1] 王世杰. 喀斯特石漠化——中国西南最严重的生态地质环境问题[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2003,2: 121–126.
[2] 伏文兵,严友进,王凯,何腾兵,罗海波,龙健. 喀斯特石漠化区治理措施对土壤质量演变的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021,28(2): 27–32.
[3] 罗旭玲,王世杰,白晓永,谭秋,冉晨,陈欢,习慧鹏,陈飞,操玥,吴路华,李汇文,钟昕. 西南喀斯特地区石漠化时空演变过程分析[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(2): 680–693.
[4] 任军,刘方,朱健,罗洋,李松,钟雪雯. 锰矿废渣区苔藓物种多样性及其重金属污染监测[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020,20(6): 2398–2407.
[5] Anna L I, Tássia T G T, Eliete D S B. Bryophytes from Caviana and Mexiana Islands, Archipelago of Marajó, Brazil[J]. Knowledge Network Node, 2020,41(20): 255–264.
[6] Kropik M, Zechmeister H, Fuxj?ger C. The Fate of Bryophyte Sporophytes—Phenology and Vectors of Buxbaumia viridis in the Kalkalpen National Park, Austria[J]. Plants, 2020,9(10): 1320.
[7] 张显强,刘天雷,从春蕾. 干旱和复水对喀斯特石生穗枝赤齿藓水分及光合生理的影响[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019,38(6): 901–909.
[8] Puglisi M, Campisi P, Privitera M. Bryophyte diversity in the gypsum outcrops of Sicily (Italy)[J]. Nova Hedwigia, 2020,111(3–4): 337–355.
[9] 蒙文萍,戴全厚,冉景丞. 苔藓植物岩溶作用研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019,43(5): 396–407.
[10] 李冰,张朝晖. 喀斯特石漠结皮层藓类物种多样性及在石漠化治理中的作用研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2009,28(1): 55–60.
[11] 丛明旸,徐跃跃,唐录艳. 镜泊湖世界地质公园火山熔岩台地苔藓植物多样性分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2020,29(6): 57–65.
[12] 黄万兴. 普定县志[M]. 贵州人民出版社, 1999.
[13] 石国尹. 平塘县志[M]. 方志出版社, 2020.
[14] 刘润,张朝晖,申家琛,王智慧. 岩溶洞穴苔藓群落特征及其对重金属污染的指示意义: 以贵州织金洞为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2018,26(12): 1277–1288.
[15] 刘丛强,郎赟超,李思亮,朴何春,涂成龙,刘涛泽,张伟,朱书法. 喀斯特生态系统生物地球化学过程与物质循环研究: 重要性、现状与趋势[J]. 地学前缘, 2009,16(6): 1–12.
[16] 熊康宁,黎平,周忠发,安裕伦,吕涛,蓝安军. 喀斯特石漠化的遥感—GIS典型研究——以贵州为例[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2002.
[17] 熊康宁,梅再美,彭贤伟,蓝安军. 喀斯特石漠化生态综合治理与示范典型研究——以贵州花江喀斯特峡谷为例[J]. 贵州林业科技, 2006,34 (1): 5–8.
[18] 陈邦杰,万宗玲,高谦等. 中国藓类属志(下册)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978.
[19] 陈邦杰,万宗玲,高谦等. 中国藓类属志(上册)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1963.
[20] 高谦. 中国苔藓植物志: 第九卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.
[21] 高谦. 中国苔藓植物志: 第二卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996.
[22] 高谦. 中国苔藓植物志: 第一卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994.
[23] 吴鹏程. 苔藓植物生物学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
[24] 张镱锂. 植物区系地理研究中的重要参数——相似性系数[J]. 地理研究. 1998.17(4)：429-434.
[25] 张金屯. 植被数量生态学方法[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社,1995.
闽公网安备 35020602000789号