实地调查深圳市坝光区域2个封育状态下的自然林和2个处于恢复状态的荒弃果林半自然林的植物群落结构，测定植物高度、盖度等指标，分析两种类型植物群落组成及多样性特征。结果表明，在群落各层次的种类组成方面，自然林乔木层与灌木层的植物种类数均大于半自然林，半自然林的灌木层与草本层发育也较好，种类丰富；在物种多样性Simpson指数、Shannon-Wiener指数和丰富度指数方面，4个群落的灌木层多样性都较其他2个层次高，说明在人为干扰减小的情况下，灌木的自我更新能力较强。自然林3个群落层次及整体指标等多数高于半自然林，说明自然林植被结构发育较好，各层次种类数更为丰富，各种类个体数及分布更为均匀；而处于恢复状态的半自然林，由于受到人为干扰的印迹未完全消失，乔木层的多样性指数明显低于自然林，但也因为处于恢复状态，灌木层与草本层的恢复使其物种多样性逐渐增高。
The plant community structures of two sealed natural forests and two restored abandoned semi-natural forests in Baguang area of Shenzhen were investigated, the plant height, coverage and other indexes were measured, and the composition and diversity characteristics of the two types of plant communities were analyzed. The results showed that in terms of species composition at all levels of the community, the numbers of plant species in tree layer and shrub layer of natural forest were greater than those of semi-natural forest, and the shrub layer and herb layer of semi-natural forest were also well developed and rich in species. In terms of species diversity Simpson index, Shannon Wiener index and richness index, the shrub layer diversity of the four communities was higher than the other two layers, indicating that the shrub had strong self-renewal ability under the condition of reduced human disturbance. Most of diversity indexes of the three community layers and overall indexes in natural forest were higher than those of semi-natural forest, indicating that the vegetation structure of natural forest was well developed, the number of species at each level was richer, and the number and distribution of individuals of various classes were more uniform. In the restored semi natural forest, due to the imprint of human disturbance, the diversity index of tree layer was significantly lower than that of natural forest, but also because it was in the restored state, the species diversity was gradually increased by the restoration of shrub layer and herb layer.
[1] 叶有华, 喻本德, 郭微, 林石狮, 李月香. 深圳东涌红树林生态系统多样性研究(英文)[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013(2): 199–206.
[2] 陈晓霞, 李瑜, 茹正忠, 昝欣, 谭凤仪, 昝启杰. 深圳坝光银叶树群落结构与多样性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015(6): 1487–1498.
[3] Liang H, Huang Y Y, Lin S Z, Zhao K S, Zou Y F, Yu X F, Yang L J, Xu W, Ming Z, Zhou Z B. Study on plant diversity of mountain areas of Yangmeikeng and Chiao, Shenzhen, China[J]. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2016, 7(17): 2527–2552.
[4] 黄玉源, 招康塞, 杨立君. 深圳山地植物群落结构与多样性研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
[5] 黄玉源, 许斌, 梁鸿, 余欣繁, 魏若宇, 叶蓁, 许斌, 梁鸿, 温海洋, 王帆. 深圳坝光国际生物谷规划区域生态状况与保护策略研究(Ⅲ)——坝光全区域生态保护策略[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2017, 42(3): 21–26.
[6] 梁鸿, 许斌, 温海洋, 余欣繁, 黄玉源, 王帆, 魏若宇, 叶蓁, 陈志洁, 马嵩. 深圳坝光国际生物谷规划区域生态状况与保护策略研究(上篇)——坝光区域陆地植被生态学特征[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2017, 42(3): 7–14.
[7] 许斌, 梁鸿, 王帆, 杨立君, 温海洋, 段振亮, 黄玉源, 马嵩, 叶蓁, 魏若宇. 深圳坝光国际生物谷规划区域生态状况与保护策略研究(Ⅱ)——坝光区域淡水水域生态学特征[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2017, 42(3): 15–20.
[8] 明珠, 招康赛, 杨立君. 深圳市植物物种多样性调查与保护对策[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2013(2): 86–88.
[9] 王兆东, 谢利娟, 龙丹丹, 张华. 银湖山郊野公园典型植物群落物种多样性比较[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016(4): 16–24.
[10] 宋永昌. 植被生态学[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2001.
[11] 张金屯. 数量生态学(第2版)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.
12] 万树明, 何飞飞, 陈恋, 邹冬生. 紫色土人工植被恢复地植物多样性研究[J]. 作物研究, 2011, 25(5): 482–485, 488.
[13] 黄玉源, 余欣繁, 招康赛, 余欣繁, 招康赛, 杨立君, 梁鸿, 卢云鹤, 王贺银, 刘浩. 深圳小南山与应人石山地植物多样性比较研究[J]. 广西植物, 2016(7): 795–805.
[14] 黄玉源, 余欣繁, 梁鸿, 招康赛, 卢云鹤, 陈永恒, 刘念, 杨立君, 董安强, 明珠. 深圳莲花山植被组成及植物多样性研究[J]. 农业研究与应用, 2016(2): 18–32.
[15] 许建新, 钱瑭璜, 冯志坚, 刘永金. 深圳坝光精细化工园区植物资源及植被类型分析[J]. 福建林业科技, 2012(1): 108–111.
[16] 黄志霖, 田耀武, 王俊青, 雷静品. 人工干扰对三峡库区柏木人工林下植物物种多样性的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2011, 18(4): 132–139.
[17] 江小蕾, 张卫国, 杨振宇. 不同干扰类型对高寒草甸群落结构和植物多样性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(9): 1479–1485.
[18] 毛志宏, 朱教君. 干扰对植物群落物种组成及多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(8): 2696–2701.
闽公网安备 35020602000789号