植物生态与资源分类

英德市公益林质量评价研究

  • TAN Jun-jie ,
  • HUANG Hua-rong
展开
  • (广东省岭南院勘察设计有限公司,广东 广州 510095)

收稿日期: 2022-09-15

  录用日期: 2022-10-20

  网络出版日期: 2023-01-17

基金资助

广东省林业局项目“广东省生态公益林发展状况绿皮书”

Quality Evaluation of Public Welfare Forest in Yingde City

  • 谭俊杰,黄华蓉
Expand
  • (Guangdong Lingnanyuan Exploration and Design Co. Ltd., Guangzhou 510095, Guangdong China)

Received date: 2022-09-15

  Accepted date: 2022-10-20

  Online published: 2023-01-17

摘要

采用层次分析法对广东英德市公益林进行森林质量评价,根据生产力状况、林分稳定性、土壤条件三个准则层筛选出平均胸径、平均树高、郁闭度等9项指标,建立公益林质量评价指标体系并进行等级划分。结果表明,英德市公益林质量综合质量等级为良,生产力状况较优。公益林整体龄组以幼龄林和中龄林为主,而生态效益较好的近熟林、成熟林和过熟林面积占比较低,各龄组公益林综合森林质量随龄组成熟度的提高而上升。从评价指标权重来看,生产力状况是评价公益林质量的最重要指标;郁闭度、森林群落结构、枯枝落叶厚度是评价生产力状况、林分稳定性、土壤条件对公益林影响的重要因子。在公益林建设和管理中,建议对公益林的森林结构进行优化,对林种、龄组进行战略性调整,在尽量不改变现有植被盖度和郁闭度的前提下,适当间伐、补植、补造,提高林木质量,同时对公益林长期连续性监测,掌握公益林质量状况的动态变化规律,为未来公益林建设提供理论依据。

本文引用格式

TAN Jun-jie , HUANG Hua-rong . 英德市公益林质量评价研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2022 , 51(5) : 368 -373 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2022.05.006

Abstract

This study used the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the forest quality of public welfare forests in Yingde City, Guangdong Province. According to the productivity status, stand stability, and soil conditions, nine indicators such as average diameter at breast height, average tree height, and canopy density were selected, and a public welfare forest quality evaluation index system was established and graded. The results showed that the comprehensive quality grade of the public welfare forest in Yingde was good, and the productivity was excellent. The overall age group of public welfare forests were dominated by young and middle aged forests, and the area of near mature and over mature forests with good ecological benefits were relatively low. The comprehensive forest quality evaluation of public welfare forests in all age groups increased with the increasing of age composition maturity. From the weight of evaluation indicators, the productivity status was the most important indicator to evaluate the impact of public welfare forests. The canopy density, forest community structure and litter thickness were important indicators to evaluate the impact of productivity, stand stability and soil conditions on public welfare forests. It was suggested that in the future construction and management of public welfare forests, the forest structure of public welfare forests should be optimized, and the forest types and age groups should be strategically adjusted. Under the condition of not changing the existing vegetation coverage and canopy density as far as possible, appropriate thinning, replanting, and replanting should be carried out to improve the quality of forests. Long term continuous monitoring of public welfare forests should be carried out to master the dynamic change law of the quality of public welfare forests.

参考文献

[1] 国家林业局植树造林司. GB/T 18337.1–2001 生态公益林建设导则[S]. 国家质量技术监督局, 2001. 

[2] 袁俊平. 公益林生态效能特点及管护[J]. 中国林业, 2010(22): 56. 

[3] 武生权, 霍炳南, 谷建才. 承德市滦平县生态公益林质量评价[J]. 林业与生态科学, 2018, 33(4): 395–401. 

[4] 李红振. 辽宁省生态公益林质量监测与评价[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2022, 48(2): 29–34. 

[5] 齐也, 江瑶, 张中瑞. 广东蕉岭生态公益林质量评价[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2021, 37(4): 91–95. 

[6] 张会儒, 雷相东, 张春雨, 赵秀海, 胡雪凡. 森林质量评价及精准提升理论与技术研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5): 1–18. 

[7] 严会超. 生态公益林质量评价与可持续经营研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学硕士学位论文, 2005. 

[8] 黄卫平. 生态公益林质量评价探析[J]. 林业科技情报, 2020, 52(2): 41–43. 

[9] 杨倩楠, 石莹怡, 张泽宇, 王超. 基于模糊物元模型的生态公益林综合效益评价——以英德市为例[J]. 广西林业科学, 2022, 51(1): 84–92. 

[10] 刘伟, 谢小祎. 森林质量评价及精准提升理论与技术研究[J]. 山西农经, 2019(14): 75–76. 

[11] 王建军, 安冰. 基于层次分析法的广西国有派阳山林场森林健康状况综合评价[J]. 西部林业科学, 2022, 51(3): 114–117. 

[12] 夏本安, 文敏, 任煜堃, 陈佳楠, 糜新宇, 王品, 唐代生. 基于层次分析法的湖南省森林碳汇发展潜力评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(11): 97–102. 

[13] 梅浩, 彭泰来, 桂来庭. 广东省国家级公益林质量评价[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019(2): 15–20. 

[14] 齐也, 江瑶, 张中瑞. 广东蕉岭生态公益林质量评价[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2021, 37(4): 91–95. 

[15] 李红振. 辽宁省生态公益林质量监测与评价[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2022, 48(2): 29–34. 

[16] 孙敏, 周春国. 小班尺度森林资源质量评价——以南京市老山林场为例[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(2): 101–104. 

[17] 胡焕香, 佘济云, 张敏, 毛旭鹏, 孟伟. 基于小班尺度的宁远河流域森林健康评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(2): 182–186. 

[18] 李红振. 辽宁省生态公益林质量监测与评价[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2022, 48(2): 29–34. 

[19] 余志明. 生态公益林管护问题及解决途径探析[J]. 绿色科技, 2019(13): 214–215.

文章导航

/