生理生化

5种药剂对红火蚁的田间药效评价

  • 郑秀芳
展开
  • (厦门市同安区植保植检站,福建 厦门 361100)
郑秀芳,农艺师,从事植物检疫与植物保护。

收稿日期: 2014-02-19

  修回日期: 2014-02-19

  网络出版日期: 2014-06-10

Field Efficacy Evaluation of Five Kinds of Chemicals on Solenopsis invicta

  • ZHENG Xiu-fang
Expand
  • (Plant Protection Station of Tongan in Xiamen City, Xiamen 361100, Fujian China)

Received date: 2014-02-19

  Revised date: 2014-02-19

  Online published: 2014-06-10

摘要

以活动蚁巢减退率和工蚁减退率为指标,评价红火蚁克星(Ⅳ型)、灭蚁威、火蚁净、蚁净安和灭蚁蝗等5种药剂对红火蚁的防治效果。结果表明,不同药剂间防治效果存在差异,其中药后21 d,红火蚁克星(Ⅳ型)和灭蚁威饵剂均具有很好的防治效果,对蚁巢防效和活动工蚁的防治效果均达90.0%以上。建议采用上述两种药剂进行轮换使用,从而延缓红火蚁产生抗药性。

本文引用格式

郑秀芳 . 5种药剂对红火蚁的田间药效评价[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2014 , 43(02) : 156 -158 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2014.02.015

Abstract

By means of the active mound decrease rate and worker ants decline rate indexes, the author evaluated five chemicals’ efficacy of preventing Solenopsis invicta, including ‘Solenopsis invicta Killer (IV-Type)’, ‘Mieyiwei’, ‘Huoyijing’, ‘Yijingan’ and ‘Mieyihuang’. The results show that there are some differences of the control efficacy between these chemicals. After 21 d treatment, ‘Solenopsis invicta Killer(IV-Type)’ and ‘Mieyiwei’ showed good control efficacy. The control efficacy of the nest prevention and worker ants can reach more than 90.0%. It is suggested that we should alternate these two chemicals to delay the drug-resistant of Solenopsis invicta.

参考文献

[1] 曾玲,陆永跃,陈忠南,等. 红火蚁监测与防治[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2005.<br>

[2] 黄俊,陆永跃,梁文广,曾鑫年,曾玲. 四种毒饵对红火蚁的田间防治效果评价[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2008,30(2): 135—140.<br>

[3] 吴志红,王凯学,覃贵亮,邓铁军,刘桂梅. 几种毒饵对红火蚁的室外诱杀效果比较[J]. 广西植保, 2006,19(3): 7—9.<br>

[4] 唐启义,冯光明. 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统[M]. 北京: 北京科技出版社, 2002.<br>

[5] 李惠陵,吴仕豪,李华,王琳,梁铭生,巫文静,罗映鹏,练惠通,曾玲. 红火蚁防控药剂的田间药效试验评价[J]. 广东农业科学, 2007(10): 57—59.<br>

[6] 谢毅璇. 灭蚁威对不同生境下红火蚁的药效评价[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2012,41(4): 63—66.<br>

[7] 章霜红. 龙岩市新罗区红火蚁防控实践中防治方法的应用评价[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2010(8): 43—47.<br>
文章导航

/

〈 〉