厦门市古树名木资源现状与空间布局分析

王龙平

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2024.06.010

亚热带植物科学 >

2024 , Vol. 53 >Issue 6: 569 - 576

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2024.06.010

研究论文

厦门市古树名木资源现状与空间布局分析

王龙平

展开

(厦门市绿化中心，福建厦门 361000)

收稿日期: 2024-08-21

录用日期: 2024-11-07

网络出版日期: 2025-03-20

基金资助

福建省住房和城乡建设系统2019年第一批科学技术项目(2019-K-44)

收起

Analysis of the Current Status and Spatial Distribution of Ancient and Famous Trees in Xiamen City

WANG Long-ping

Expand

(Xiamen Administration Center of Afforestation, Xiamen 361000, Fujian China)

Received date: 2024-08-21

Accepted date: 2024-11-07

Online published: 2025-03-20

Fold

摘要

对厦门市古树名木资源现状和空间分布特征进行分析，旨在进一步掌握厦门市古树名木资源情况，为古树名木的保护和管理工作提供科学依据。研究基于2021～2023年厦门市古树名木调查数据，采用GIS信息技术与传统分析结合的方法，分析厦门市古树名木3项物种多样性指数，以及分布情况与行政区域、地形、坡度、坡向的关系。厦门市登记在册的古树名木共有1773株，其中名木、一级古树、二级古树、三级古树分别有11、68、319、1375株，隶属于27科39属43种；生长势正常的占比为82.18%，以本土树种为主，其中榕树数量最多。生物多样性Shannon-Wiener(H)指数为1.588，Pielou均匀度指数为0.420，Margalef丰富度指数5.882，生物多样性处于中等状态。厦门市古树名木最邻近比率为0.30＜1，空间分布类型为聚集型；思明区鼓浪屿分布密度最高，超过26.9株·km^–2；94.6%古树名木分布在坡度＜15°地形上，各个坡向分布较为均匀；不同土地利用类型中古树名木占比最高的为居民及建设用地，达63.8%，其次为耕地，比例为29.9%。

关键词： 厦门市; 古树名木; 资源现状; 空间布局

本文引用格式

王龙平 . 厦门市古树名木资源现状与空间布局分析[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2024 , 53(6) : 569 -576 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2024.06.010

Abstract

This study analyzed the current status and spatial distribution characteristics of ancient and famous trees in Xiamen City, with the aim of gaining a deeper understanding of the situation of these resources and providing a scientific basis for their protection and management. Based on data from the 2021–2023 survey of ancient and famous trees in Xiamen, the study employed a combination of GIS information technology and traditional analysis methods to examine three diversity indices of ancient and famous trees, as well as their distribution in relation to administrative regions, topography, slope, and aspect. Xiamen City has a total of 1773 ancient and famous trees registered in its records，including 11 famous trees, 68 first-grade ancient trees, 319 second-grade ancient trees, and 1375 third-grade ancient trees, belonging to 43 species of 39 genera in 27 families. The proportion of those with normal growth potential is 82.18%. The species are predominantly native, with banyan trees being the most numerous. The Shannon-Wiener (H) index for biodiversity is 1.588, the Pielou evenness index is 0.420, and the Margalef richness index is 5.882, indicating a moderate level of biodiversity. The nearest neighbor ratio for ancient and famous trees in Xiamen City is 0.30, which is less than 1, indicating a clustered spatial distribution type. The highest density is found in Gulangyu, Siming District, exceeding 26.9 trees per square kilometer. 94.6% of these trees are located on slopes less than 15 degrees, and they are evenly distributed across various aspects. Among different land use types, residential and construction land has the highest proportion of ancient and famous trees, accounting for 63.8%, followed by farmland at 29.9%.

Key words： Xiamen City; ancient and famous trees; resource status; spatial distribution

参考文献

[1] Piovesan G, Cannon H C, Liu J J, Munné-Bosch S. Ancient trees: irreplaceable conservation resource for ecosystem restoration [J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2022, 37(12): 1025–1028.

[2] 谭莹, 徐军, 林聪聪, 王柯, 王文武, 陈春雷. 基于层次分析法的浙江省古树名木资源综合价值评估研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2023, 4: 169–178.

[3] Lindenmayer D B, Laurance W F. The ecology, distribution, conservation and management of large old trees [J]. Biological Reviews, 2017, 92(3): 1434–1458.

[4] 王继程. 古树名木综合价值评价研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学硕士学位论文, 2011.

[5] Yang Z J, Zheng Q R, Zhuo M X, Zeng H D, Hogan J A, Lin T C. A culture of conservation: how an ancient forest plantation turned into an old-growth forest reserve-the story of the Wamulin forest [J]. People and Nature, 2021, 3(5): 1014–1024.

[6] 宋馥杉, 张齐兵. 古树名木树龄鉴定及其科研价值研究[J]. 国土绿化, 2018,10: 50–51.

[7] 富世文, 梁超琼, 陈艳, 王薇, 任宏涛, 廖正平, 昝林森. 陕西省古树名木保护研究现状及对策建议[J]. 陕西林业科技, 2022, 50(6): 136–140.

[8] 王枫. 古树名木保护: 发展历程•内涵辨析与制度构建[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(15): 98–101.

[9] Lindenmayer D B, Laurance W F, Franklin J F. Global decline in large old trees [J]. Science, 2012, 338(6112): 1305–1306.

[10] 陈勇, 何峰, 韩也逸. 南京市古树名木资源现状与空间布局[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(12): 14–23.

[11] 李艳龙, 陈帅, 贺晓慧, 王多文, 安万秀. 河西地区古树名木资源特征及空间分布格局分析[J]. 西部林业科学, 2023, 52(6): 110–119.

[12] 陈傲雪, 曲晨晖, 牟村, 刘帅, 廖小雯, 贺勇, 吴磊. 湖南省沅水流域古树名木资源特征分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(4): 70–80.

[13] 廖坤富. 上杭城区古树名木的物种多样性和空间分布特征研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学硕士学位论文, 2020.

[14] 勾啸, 李云华, 魏丹. 广东省珠海市古树名木资源现状及保护对策研究[J]. 国家林业和草原局管理干部学院学报, 2022(4): 29–36.

[15] 邱族周, 胡希军, 钱惠. 新田县古树名木资源组成和空间分布特征分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(10): 46–56.

[16] 常玮, 运迎霞, 郑开雄. 生态文明背景下城市古树名木保护规划方法研究——以厦门海沧区为例[J]. 探索发现, 2018, 172(7): 192–196.

[17] 骆琳琳. 古树名木的保护与景观应用——以厦门市为例[J]. 林草科技, 2023, 235(9): 80–82.

[18] 王璐瑶, 张鑫乾. 鼓浪屿古树名木景观优化研究初探[J]. 广东园林, 2019(4): 71–75.

[19] 黄延安. 试论同安古树名木的保护与复壮[J]. 福建热作科技, 2015, 40(1): 63–66.

[20] 国家林业局. LY/T 2738—2016,古树名木普查技术规范[S]. 2016.

[21] 栗忠飞, 高吉喜. 生物多样性评估方法的综述与评价[J]. 中国发展, 2018, 18(2): 1–13.

[22] Liu J J, Lindenmayer D B, Yang W J, Ren Y, Campbell M J, Wu C, Luo Y, Zhong L, Yu M. Diversity and density patterns of large old trees in China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 655: 255–262.

Options

文章导航

〈

〉

闽ICP备11008787号-5　

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献