基于层次分析法的13个芍药品种观赏价值综合评价

YING Meng-yun; SHI Jian-yu; YE Qiu-ping; SHEN Qing-yu; YU Wen

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2024.06.011

亚热带植物科学 >

2024 , Vol. 53 >Issue 6: 577 - 583

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2024.06.011

研究论文

基于层次分析法的13个芍药品种观赏价值综合评价

YING Meng-yun ,
SHI Jian-yu ,
YE Qiu-ping ,
SHEN Qing-yu ,
YU Wen

展开

(福建省亚热带植物研究所 / 福建省亚热带植物生理生化重点实验室，福建厦门 361006)

收稿日期: 2024-06-19

录用日期: 2024-08-16

网络出版日期: 2025-03-20

基金资助

厦门市科技计划项目(3502Z20204503-3)

收起

Comprehensive Evaluation on the Ornamental Value of 13 Paeonia lactiflora Varieties Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

应梦云，施建羽，叶秋萍，沈清宇，余雯

Expand

(Fujian Institute of Subtropical Botany / Fujian Key Laboratory of Subtropical Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Xiamen 361006, Fujian China)

Received date: 2024-06-19

Accepted date: 2024-08-16

Online published: 2025-03-20

Fold

摘要

收集整理13个优质观赏芍药Paeonia lactiflora品种，在其观赏性综合评价模型基础上选取基于花朵、植株相关性状和生长特性等13个观赏指标，采用层次分析法(AHP)进行观赏价值评价，筛选观赏价值高的品种。结果表明，根据构建的判断矩阵，指标层中花色、株型、生长势所占权重较大，在芍药观赏价值评价中尤为重要。根据综合得分将芍药品种分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ级，Ⅰ级的4个品种观赏效果最佳，包括‘雪原红星’‘凤羽落金池’‘奇花露霜’和‘种生粉’，具有良好的适应性和观赏性，宜发挥优势进行推广；Ⅱ级的6个品种综合表现一般，包括‘墨紫绫’‘大富贵’‘晴雯’‘蓝富士’‘鲁红’和‘艳紫向阳’；Ⅲ级品种综合评价值较低，包括‘红富士’‘ 红艳争辉’和‘紫凤朝阳’。该评价结果可为芍药资源在观赏园艺中的应用提供参考。

关键词： 芍药; 层次分析法; 观赏价值; 综合评价

本文引用格式

YING Meng-yun , SHI Jian-yu , YE Qiu-ping , SHEN Qing-yu , YU Wen . 基于层次分析法的13个芍药品种观赏价值综合评价[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2024 , 53(6) : 577 -583 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2024.06.011

Abstract

Thirteen high-quality ornamental varieties of Paeonia lactiflora were collected and observed in this study. Selecting indicators based on a comprehensive evaluation model for the ornamental value of varieties. Thirteen ornamental indicators based on flower traits, plant traits, and growth properties were selected to comprehensively evaluate the ornamental values of P. lactiflora varieties using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. The results showed that according to the constructed judgment matrix, the weight of flower color, plant type, and growth potential in the indicator layer were relatively high, which was particularly important in the evaluation of the ornamental value of P. lactiflora. These varieties were divided into gradeⅠ,Ⅱand Ⅲ based on the comprehensive scores. The four varieties of gradeⅠhad the best ornamental effects, including ‘Xueyuanhongxing’, ‘Fengyuluojinchi’, ‘Qihualushuang’ , ‘Zhongshengfen’ , which had good adaptability and ornamental value. They were advisable to leverage their advantages for promotion. The comprehensive performance of the six varieties of grade Ⅱ was average, including ‘Moziling’, ‘Dafugui’, ‘Qingwen’, ‘Lanfushi’, ‘Luhong’, ‘Yanzixiangyang’. The comprehensive evaluation value of grade Ⅲ was relatively low, including ‘Hongfushi’, ‘Hongyanzhenghui’, ‘Zifengzhaoyang’. The comprehensive evaluation results of the ornamental value of P. lactiflora based on the analytic hierarchy process could provide reference for the application of P. lactiflora resources in ornamental horticulture.

Key words： Paeonia lactiflora; analytic hierarchy process; ornamental value; comprehensive evaluation

参考文献

[1] 李珂楠, 杨成龙, 范竟超. 基于SSR标记的芍药种质资源遗传多样性研究[J]. 种子, 2020(3): 57–60.

[2] Fan Y M, Wang Q, Dong Z J, Yin Y J, Teixiera J A, Yu X N. Advances in molecular biology of Paeonia L. [J]. Planta, 2020, 251(1): 23.

[3] 万映伶, 朱梦婷, 刘爱青, 金亦佳, 刘燕. 中国观赏芍药表型多样性解析与资源评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(18): 3629–3639.

[4] 高政平, 张光琴, 李桂香. 观赏芍药优新品种园林开发价值评价与筛选[J]. 山东林业科技, 2022, 52(3): 57–60, 42.

[5] 于晓南, 宋焕芝, 郑黎文. 国外观赏芍药育种与应用及其启示[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 36(S2): 159–162, 166.

[6] 曹茂林. 层次分析法确定评价指标权重及Excel计算[J]. 江苏科技信息, 2012(2): 39–40.

[7] 谢光园, 魏甲彬, 冯倩, 赵富群, 陈乐谞. 衡阳市公园绿地彩叶树种物候调查与评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(20): 120–124.

[8] 孙印兵, 于文胜, 张慧, 张京伟, 罗珍珍. 层次分析法在铁线莲引种评价和筛选上的应用[J]. 山东林业科技, 2020, 50(4): 18–21, 17.

[9] 李艳梅, 段琳, 杨瑞娟, 杨英军. 洛阳市40个引入的牡丹品种观赏价值评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(16): 3978–3982.

[10] 陈俊晖, 骆亮, 刘梓富, 吴沙沙, 翟俊文, 彭东辉. 基于层次分析法的朱砂根品系观赏价值评价[J]. 宁德师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2017, 29(3): 251–258.

[11] 朱德宁, 韩宇, 房伟民, 陈发棣, 陈素梅, 邓波, 管志勇. 多花型园林小菊品质评价与品种筛选[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2018, 41(2): 266–274.

[12] 崔毅婵, 林雪茜, 杨玲, 洑香香. 不同四照花观赏价值的综合评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2022, 31(6): 43–51.

[13] 简兴. 层次分析法在城市绿地景观评价中的应用[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2009, 25(7): 610–612, 625.

[14] 李笑梅. 多指标综合评价方法综述[J]. 统计与管理, 2022, 37(2): 45–48.

[15] 杨蕾, 丁云峰, 陈昌建, 文佳慧, 朱岩, 马艳丽. 基于层次分析法的引种芍药价值综合评价[J]. 现代园艺, 2023, 46(1): 87–89.

Options

文章导航

〈

〉

闽ICP备11008787号-5　

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献