研究论文

海南凤仙花叶片光合特性及解剖结构对干旱胁迫的响应

  • SHI Yu ,
  • WANG Yun-jin ,
  • LI He-qin ,
  • ZHANG Pei-lan ,
  • ZHONG Yun-fang ,
  • SONG Xi-qiang ,
  • ZHANG Jin-ling
展开
  • (1. 海南大学热带农林学院,海南 儋州 571737;2. 海南大学热带特色林木花卉遗传与种质创新教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570228;3. 海南省热带特色花木资源生物学重点实验室,海南 海口 570228)

收稿日期: 2025-02-19

  录用日期: 2025-03-13

  网络出版日期: 2025-10-13

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目(32201282);国家自然科学基金面上项目(32371595);海南省自然科学基金青年项目(322QN249);海南大学科研启动项目(RZ2200002427)

Response of Photosynthetic Characteristics and Leaf Anatomy to Drought Stress of Impatiens hainanensis

  • 石 俣,王云锦,李和芹,张培兰,钟云芳,宋希强,张金玲
Expand
  • (1. College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Danzhou 571737, Hainan China; 2. Ministry of EducationKey Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Specialty Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Haikou 570228, Hainan China; 3. Hainan Key Laboratory of Biology of Tropical Specialty Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Haikou 570228, Hainan China)

Received date: 2025-02-19

  Accepted date: 2025-03-13

  Online published: 2025-10-13

摘要

为探究热带喀斯特专性植物海南凤仙花Impatiens hainanensis叶片对干旱胁迫的响应机制,设置8种干旱处理,测定6月龄海南凤仙花实生苗叶片的光合、荧光及解剖结构。结果表明:(1) 随着干旱胁迫加剧,净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)及气孔导度(Gs)均呈下降趋势,而胞间CO2浓度(Ci)呈先降低后升高趋势。(2) 随着干旱胁迫加剧,最大荧光产量(Fm)、最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)及光合性能指数(PI abs)均呈下降趋势,而初始荧光产量(Fo)、单位反应中心吸收的光能(ABS/RC)、单位反应中心耗散的能量(DIo/RC)及单位反应中心捕获的用于还原QA的能量(TRo/RC)均呈上升趋势,干旱胁迫抑制荧光活性。(3) 干旱胁迫下,叶片组织结构紧密度均呈增大趋势,气孔密度和栅海比随胁迫加剧大致呈先升后降变化,而气孔指数、气孔开张比、叶片厚度、叶肉组织厚度以及组织结构疏松度均呈减小趋势。综上所述,海南凤仙花对不同程度干旱胁迫的响应方式不同:在轻度干旱处理下主要通过增大气孔面积、气孔密度,降低叶片厚度(T2处理最为明显)来提高抗旱性,在中度干旱T4处理时栅海比达到最高,重度干旱处理时主要通过降低栅海比、提高叶片组织结构紧密度来减少干旱的伤害。该研究结果可为海南凤仙花的种质资源保育、种群恢复工作提供一定参考。

本文引用格式

SHI Yu , WANG Yun-jin , LI He-qin , ZHANG Pei-lan , ZHONG Yun-fang , SONG Xi-qiang , ZHANG Jin-ling . 海南凤仙花叶片光合特性及解剖结构对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2025 , 54(4) : 387 -397 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2025.04.003

Abstract

In order to investigate the response mechanism of the leaves of Impatiens hainanensis, a tropical karst specialized plant, to drought stress, eight drought treatments were set up to determine the photosynthetic, fluorescence and anatomical structures of the leaves of 6-month-old I. hainanensis seedlings. The results showed that: (1) With the intensification of drought stress, the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (Gs) showed a decreasing trend, while the interstitial CO2 concentration (Ci) showed a decreasing and then increasing trend. (2) With the intensification of drought stress, the maximum fluorescence yield (Fm), maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) and photosynthetic performance index (PI abs) showed a decreasing trend, while the initial fluorescence yield (Fo), light energy absorbed per unit reaction center (ABS/RC), energy dissipated per unit reaction center (DIo/RC), and energy captured per unit reaction center for QA reduction (TRo/RC) showed a decreasing trend. (TRo/RC) all showed an upward trend, and drought stress suppressed the fluorescence activity. (3) With the intensification of drought stress, cell tense ratio (CTR) showed an increasing trend. The stomatal density (SD) and palisade-to-sea ratio (P/S) exhibited a general pattern of first increasing and then decreasing as stress intensified. Meanwhile, the stomatal index (SI), stomatal opening ratio (SOR), leaf thickness (LT), mesophyll tissue thickness, and spongy ratio (SR) tended to decrease. In summary, the response of I. hainanensis to different levels of drought stress varies: under mild drought conditions, drought resistance is primarily enhanced by enlarging stomatal area and stomatal density of leaf while reducing leaf thickness (most pronounced in T2 treatment). Under moderate drought conditions (T4 treatment), the palisade-to-sea ratio reaches its peak. Under severe drought conditions, drought damage is primarily mitigated by reducing the palisade-to-sea ratio and increasing cell tense ratio. The results of this study can provide a reference for the conservation of germplasm resources and population restoration of I. hainanensis.

参考文献

[1] Seleiman M F, AlSuhaibani N, Ali N, Akmal M, Alotaibi M, Refay Y, Dindaroglu T, Abdul Wajid H H, Battaglia M L. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects [J]. Plants, 2021, 10(2): 259–259.
[2] Zhang T, Liu C X, Chen Y Z, Xu Y, Tang W, Chen L S, Li Z. Physiological and biochemical effects of exogenous calcium on Camellia oleifera Abel under drought stress [J]. Forests, 2023, 14(10): 2082–2082.
[3] Li W, Pacheco L J, Migliavacca M, Miralles D, Hoek van D A, Reichstein M. Widespread and complex drought effects on vegetation physiology inferred from space [J]. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): 4640–4640.
[4] 董燕平, 王斌, 韦玉莲, 何凤, 陆芳, 李冬兴, 黄甫昭, 郭屹立, 向悟生, 李先琨. 喀斯特季节性雨林优势树种叶片微形态与光合生理特征及其生态适应性[J]. 广西植物, 2023, 43(3): 415–428.
[5] 许爱祝, 江海都, 浦乾琨, 韦霄, 韦宇静, 罗亚进, 柴胜丰. 三种地宝兰属植物叶片解剖结构及光合特性的比较研究[J]. 广西植物, 2024, 44(1): 113–125.
[6] 潘莹萍, 陈亚鹏. 叶片水力性状研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(10): 2834–2841.
[7] Li Y Z, Jiang Y, Zhao K N, Chen Y, Wei W, Shipley B, Chu C J. Exploring trait-performance relationships of tree seedlings along experimentally manipulated light and water gradients [J]. Ecology, 2022, 103(7): 3703–3703.
[8] 宁瑶, 雷金睿, 宋希强, 韩淑梅, 钟云芳. 石灰岩特有植物海南凤仙花潜在适宜生境分布模拟[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(9): 946–954.
[9] 黄蔚霞, 孟新亚, 钟云芳, 张金玲, 宋希强. 基于栅格尺度下喀斯特专性植物海南凤仙花生境水资源脆弱性时空分异变化[J]. 生态科学, 2024, 43(1): 113–123.
[10] 钟云芳, 武华周, 宋希强, 周兆德. 海南凤仙花生境地物种多样性及其与环境关系研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2014, 35(2): 355–361.
[11] 姜超, 谭珂, 任明迅. 季风对亚洲热带植物分布格局的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(10): 1103–1112.
[12] 钟云芳, 张哲, 宋希强, 周兆德. 海南凤仙花不同海拔种群的传粉生物学[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(4): 467–475.
[13] 吴胜安, 邢彩盈, 朱晶晶. 海南岛气候特征分析[J]. 热带生物学报, 2022, 13(4): 315–323.
[14] Afsoun K, Davood S, Navid A, Abdonnabi B. The combination of nanoparticles and endophytes boosts Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) resistance to drought stress by elevating levels of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and essential oils [J]. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 2024, 11(1): 163–163.
[15] Strasser R J, Tsimilli-michael M, Srivastava A. Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient [M] //Papageorgiou G C, Govindjee. Advance in Photosynthesis and Respiration (Vol.19). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2004: 321–362.
[16] 李英浩, 刘景辉, 赵宝平, 田露, 薛国兴. 干旱胁迫对燕麦生长及叶片光系统Ⅱ活性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2020, 40(10): 1706–1713.
[17] 李想, 石广丽, 耿佳麒, 孙丹, 王振兴, 艾军. 温室栽培对软枣猕猴桃叶片形态及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2024, 44(7): 1037–1045.
[18] 张金玲, 李玉玲, 庞梦丽, 朱辰光, 毕志乐. 臭柏异形叶解剖结构及其抗旱性的比较[J]. 西北植物学报, 2017, 37(9): 1756–1763.
[19] 杨妮, 万绮雯, 李逸民, 韩妙华, 滕瑞敏, 刘洁霞, 庄静. 外源亚精胺对盐胁迫下茶树光合特性及关键酶基因表达的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(2): 378–394.
[20] 刘星宇, 王聪, 王文和, 赵亚洲, 冷平生. 3种卫矛属植物秋冬期叶片结构的变化[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2023, 38(3): 114–120.
[21] 贾贤德, 吕海英, 巫利梅, 杨伊楠, 黄仁豪, 王昊, 牛鑫. 天山野果林准噶尔山楂叶片功能性状及解剖结构对海拔的响应[J]. 植物科学学报, 2024, 42(2): 150–159.
[22] 李周, 赵雅洁, 宋海燕, 张静, 陶建平, 刘锦春. 不同水分处理下喀斯特土层厚度异质性对两种草本叶片解剖结构和光合特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(2): 721–732.
[23] 林兵, 武胜利, 管文轲, 宋川, 史智欣, 何宇翔, 岳永江. 胡杨叶片的胞间CO2浓度及气孔和非气孔限制的探究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(13): 87–92.
[24] 师生波, 刘克彪, 张莹花, 刘世增, 康才周, 李得禄. 民勤沙生植物园4种云杉属植物光化学特性的趋同适应[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(15): 5039–5048.
[25] 姚宇恒, 南丽丽, 陈洁, 夏静, 何海鹏, 马彪. 红豆草幼苗叶片光合和叶绿素荧光对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 草业科学, 2024, 41(5): 1161–1174.
[26] 张金玲, 程达, 李玉玲, 陈海鹏. 光和水分胁迫对臭柏实生幼苗光化学效率及色素组成的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(3): 278–289.
[27] 孙娅楠, 赵杨, 赵渊祥, 曹海, 龙建磊. 棕榈幼苗光合和叶绿素荧光对干旱胁迫及复水的响应[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(9): 45–52.
[28] 赵尧尧, 刘美君, 张政, 王婕, 王玉祥, 安长奇, 王跳霞. 低温和干旱双重胁迫对紫花苜蓿叶片光系统Ⅱ的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1120–1130.
[29] Zhao W S, Sun Y L, Kjelgren R, Liu X P. Response of stomatal density and bound gas exchange in leaves of maize to soil water deficit [J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37(1): 1–9.
[30] 王菲, 程小毛, 肖云龙, 黄晓霞. 千家寨野生古茶树叶片解剖结构和化学组分计量特征对海拔梯度的适应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(7): 1958–1968.
[31] 吴丽君, 李志辉, 杨模华, 王佩兰. 赤皮青冈幼苗叶片解剖结构对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(12): 3619–3626.
[32] 崔晓晗, 叶丽红, 贾文龙, 东保柱, 张敏, 宋阳. 不同土壤含水量下沙棘叶片解剖结构研究[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(2): 74–82.
[33] 韩喆, 张永强, 张浩浩, 罗文浩, 陈爱萍. 干旱胁迫对伊犁绢蒿幼苗生长及叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 105–112.
文章导航

/

〈 〉