微生物肥料对滨海困难绿地移植秋枫乔木促生及土壤改良的影响

李聚奎, 翟修彩, 陈月琴, 郭小红, 杨智敏, 潘伟杰, 廖启炓, 陈晓燕

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2026.01.006

亚热带植物科学 >

2026 , Vol. 55 >Issue 1: 57 - 63

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2026.01.006

研究论文

微生物肥料对滨海困难绿地移植秋枫乔木促生及土壤改良的影响

展开

(1. 厦门翔业城市绿化管理有限公司, 福建厦门 361102；2. 福建三炬生物科技股份有限公司, 福建厦门 361008；3. 福建省亚热带植物研究所, 福建厦门 361006；4. 漳州三炬生物技术有限公司, 福建漳州 363601)

收稿日期: 2025-11-10

录用日期: 2025-12-16

网络出版日期: 2026-02-28

基金资助

厦门市科技计划项目(3502Z20154094)

收起

Effects of Microbial Fertilizers on the Growth of Bischofia javanica Transplanted Trees and Soil Improvement in Coastal Challenging Green Spaces

Expand

(1. Xiamen Iport Urban Greening Management Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361102, Fujian China; 2. Fujian Sanju Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361008, Fujian China; 3. Fujian Institute of Subtropical Botany, Xiamen 361006, Fujian China; 4. Zhangzhou Sanju Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Zhangzhou 363601, Fujian China)

Received date: 2025-11-10

Accepted date: 2025-12-16

Online published: 2026-02-28

Fold

摘要

为了提高滨海困难绿地种植质量，采用微生物肥料进行苗木促生和土壤改良研究。设置有机肥+复合肥（传统施肥，CK)、固体微生物菌剂+复合肥（T1）、固体微生物菌剂+液体微生物菌剂+腐植酸水溶肥（T2）和固体微生物菌剂+复合微生物肥（T3）等4个处理，探讨施用微生物肥料对秋枫Bischofia javanica苗木长势、根系活力、盐离子含量和土壤理化性质的影响。结果表明，移栽6个月后，施用微生物肥料苗木成活率达100%，且长势良好；而传统施肥的苗木成活率仅80%，且叶片卷曲萎蔫，有顶端秃尖趋势，呈现盐害特征。与CK相比，微生物肥料处理的苗木新芽数、根系活力、叶绿素SPAD分别提高9.7%～34.8%、26.2%～49.6%、6.9%～14.0%，且T2处理效果最好，其次是处理T3、T1；处理T2可显著提升土壤全氮、碱解氮、有效钾和有机质含量，调节土壤酸碱度。移栽6个月后，土壤上层（0～30 cm）的氯离子（Cl^–）和钠离子（Na⁺）含量高于下层（30～60 cm），呈现返盐特点，微生物肥处理Na⁺含量差异不显著，处理T3对抑制 Cl^–含量效果最显著，其次是处理T1、T2。综上所述，施用微生物肥料可提高苗木成活率，促进新种苗木生根、新芽生长，改良土壤肥力，以施用固体微生物菌剂+液体微生物菌剂+腐植酸水溶肥效果较佳；对于抑制土壤返盐功效，以施用固体微生物菌剂+复合微生物肥效果较优。

关键词： 滨海困难绿地; 秋枫; 微生物肥料; 盐碱地; 返盐; 土壤改良

本文引用格式

李聚奎, 翟修彩, 陈月琴, 郭小红, 杨智敏, 潘伟杰, 廖启炓, 陈晓燕 . 微生物肥料对滨海困难绿地移植秋枫乔木促生及土壤改良的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2026 , 55(1) : 57 -63 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2026.01.006

Abstract

To improve the planting quality of coastal difficult green spaces, microbial fertilizers were used to promote seedling growth and improve soil. Four treatments were set up: organic fertilizer+compound fertilizer (traditional fertilization, CK), solid microbial inoculants+compound fertilizer (T1), solid microbial inoculants+ liquid microbial inoculants+humic acid water-soluble fertilizer (T2), and solid microbial inoculants+compound microbial fertilizer (T3). The effects of microbial fertilizer application on Bischofia javanica seedling growth, root activity, salt ion content, and soil physicochemical properties were analyzed. The results showed that after 6 months of transplanting, the application of microbial fertilizers significantly promoted seedling growth, improved soil physicochemical properties, and inhibited soil salinization, with a survival rate of 100%. In contrast, the survival rate of seedlings with traditional fertilization was only 80%, with leaf curling and wilting, a tendency for top baldness, and salt damage characteristics. Compared with CK, the number of new shoots, root activity, and chlorophyll SPAD of microbial fertilizers increased by 9.7%–34.8%, 26.2%–49.6%, and 6.9%–14.0%, respectively. Treatment T2 had the best effect, followed by T3 and T1. Treatment T2 significantly increased the total nitrogen, alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen, available potassium, and organic matter content in the soil, and regulated soil pH. After 6 months of transplanting, the chloride ion (Cl^–) and sodium ion (Na⁺) content in the upper layer of the soil (0–30 cm) was higher than that in the lower layer (30–60 cm), showing characteristics of salinization. There was no significant difference in sodium ion (Na⁺) content among the treatments. Treatment T3 had the most significant effect on inhibiting chloride ion (Cl^–) content, followed by T1 and T2. In summary, the application of microbial fertilizers can promote root growth and new shoot development of transplanting seedlings, increase seedling survival rates, and improve soil fertility. The best effect was achieved with the application of solid microbial inoculants+liquid microbial inoculants+humic acid water-soluble fertilizer. For inhibiting soil salinization, the best effect was achieved with the application of solid microbial inoculants + compound microbial fertilizer.

Key words： coastal challenging green spaces; Bischofia javanica; microbial fertilizer; saline-alkalilands; salt re-accumulation; soil improvement

参考文献

[1] 杨祥娣. 浅析厦门市填海区域园林苗木栽植养护技术[J]. 南方农业, 2023, 17(23): 80–83.

[2] 祝瑜，褚琳琳，朱文东，孙全，孙庆凯. 客土造林后滨海盐碱地土壤盐分分布及影响因素分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(6): 149–157.

[3] 杨倩, 侯毛毛. 盐碱地改良及园林绿化技术的研究进展[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2017(4): 74–75.

[4] 吕航, 赵月, 龚绪龙, 万佳俊, 郭慧, 许书刚. 我国滨海盐碱地改良技术综述及案例研究[J]. 水文地质工程, 2025, 52(2): 25–43.

[5] 陈丽艳, 陈育明. 浅谈滨海景观绿化设计要点——以石狮红塔湾旅游公路绿化设计为例[J]. 绿色环保建材, 2021(11): 183–184.

[6] 胡玉婕, 朱秀玲 ,丁延芹, 等.芽孢杆菌的耐盐促生机制研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(9): 64–74.

[7] 王思海. 滨海盐碱地治理技术多元复合应用研究[D]. 上海: 上海应用技术大学硕士学位论文, 2022.

[8] 福建省住房和城乡建设厅. DBJ/T 13-148-2012, 福建省城市园林植物种植技术规程[S].

[9] 住房和城乡建设部. CJJ/T 283–2018, 园林绿化工程盐碱地改良技术标准[S].

[10] 文娅, 佟岩, 田娟娟, 曲溪雲, 李洁. 微生物菌剂在园林绿化养护中的应用[J]. 智慧农业导刊, 2023(11): 58–61.

[11] 罗东志. 微生物肥料的施用对调节园林土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国林业产业, 2023(10): 43–45.

[12] 徐丽红. 泉州园林绿化种植土质量评估及其提升策略[J]. 南方园艺, 2025, 36(3): 43–53.

[13] Aibibu N, Liu Y, Zeng G, Wang X, Chen B, Song H, Xu L. Cadmium accumulation in Vetiveria zizanioides and its effects on growth, physiological and biochemical characters [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(16): 6297–6303.

[14] NY/T 1121.2–2006, 土壤检测第2部分: 土壤pH的测定[S].

[15] NY/T 1121.6–2006, 土壤检测第6部分: 土壤有机质的测定[S].

[16] NY/T 1121.24–2006, 土壤检测第24部分: 土壤全氮的测定自动定氮仪法[S].

[17] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.

[18] NY/T 1121.25–2006, 土壤检测第25部分: 土壤有效磷的测定连续流动分析仪法[S].

[19] NY/T 889–2004, 土壤速效钾和缓效钾的测定[S].

[20] 张雅静, 卢禹含, 聂喜涛, 张佳楠, 张宇婷. 改良的电感耦合等离子体发射光谱(ICP-OES)法测定石灰性土壤中交换性盐基钙、镁、钠、钾[J]. 世界地质, 2024, 43(4): 600–607.

[21] 楚秀丽, 张守攻, 孙晓梅, 许洋. 日本落叶松容器苗不同控释肥营养元素效应分析[J]. 北京林业大学, 2012, 34(6): 47–54.

[22] 黄秋良. 微生物菌肥对芳樟优良无性系苗木的生长和精油的影响[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学硕士学位论文, 2016.

[23] 姚强, 董晓霞, 宫志远, 辛寒晓, 孙中涛, 王梅, 韩建东, 刘盛林, 黄春燕, 张元祺. 滨海盐碱地产ACC脱氨酶细菌的筛选及根际促生研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(2): 54–58.

[24] Chen Y Y, Feng S S, Liu Q M, Kang D, Zhou S Z. Drought modulates root-microbe interactions and functional gene expression in plateau wetland herbaceous plants [J]. Plants, 2025, 14(15): 1–23.

[25] 曹亚静, 赵美丞, 郑春燕, 朱峰. 根际微生物介导的植物响应干旱胁迫机制研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2023, 31(8): 1330–1342.

[26] 马鸣超, 姜昕, 李力, 李俊. 胶质类芽孢杆菌功能及基因组学研究进展[J]. 生命科学, 2014, 26(10): 1038–1045.

[27] 王翠坚, 刘斌. 浅谈微生物在肥料生产中的应用[J]. 农村实用技术, 2020(2): 67–69.

[28] 张敬敏. 腐植酸与无机肥配施对杨树生理生化特性的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(31): 10959–10960, 10964.

[29] 武丽萍. 腐植酸肥料与绿色农业[J]. 腐植酸, 2003(4): 6–10.

[30] 张洋. 滨海盐碱主盐分动态及改良技术研究——以中捷农场地区为例[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学硕士学位论文, 2016.

[31] 刘银双. 耐盐促生菌株的筛选及其对设施盐渍化土壤的修复效果[D]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学硕士学位论文, 2023.

Options

文章导航

〈

〉

闽ICP备11008787号-5　

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献