研究论文

望春玉兰表型性状多样性研究

展开
  • (1. 海南大学热带农林学院 / 海南省热带特色林木花卉遗传与种质创新教育部重点实验室,海南 海口 570228;
    2.
    棕榈生态城镇发展股份有限公司,河南 郑州 450000;3. 豫兰(河南)生态科技有限公司,河南 南阳 474662;
    4.
    南召县林业发展服务中心,河南 南阳 474650)

收稿日期: 2026-04-25

  录用日期: 2026-05-30

  网络出版日期: 2026-06-30

基金资助

海南省重点研发项目(ZDYF2025XDNY071);中央财政林业草原改革发展资金(林业草原科技推广)项目(琼[2025]TG-5)

Study on Phenotypic Trait Diversity of Yulania biondii

Expand
  • (1. College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University / Key Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forests and Ornamental Plants (Ministry of Education), Haikou 570228, Hainan China; 2. Palm Eco-Town Development Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450000, Henan China; 3. Yulan (Henan) Ecological Technology Co., Ltd., Nanyang 474662, Henan China; 4. Nanzhao County Forestry Development Service Centre, Nanyang 474650, Henan China)

Received date: 2026-04-25

  Accepted date: 2026-05-30

  Online published: 2026-06-30

摘要

为揭示望春玉兰Yulania biondii的表型多样性特征,本研究以175株12年生望春玉兰实生个体为材料,连续2年系统测定花、叶、果实等部位共33个表型性状,采用多样性指数、变异系数、主成分分析与聚类分析开展研究。结果表明:20个质量性状与假质量性状的多样性指数为0.26~1.52,多样性水平表现为花部最高、果实次之、叶部最低;13个数量性状的变异系数介于9.73%~24.45%,花梗长度、托叶痕长度、果实长度分别为各个部位中变异程度最高的性状。数量性状相关性分析显示19对性状组合达显著或极显著相关;主成分分析提取12个主成分,累计贡献率达73.01%,前3个主成分依次体现花部形态与颜色、叶片形态、花丝颜色等性状的变异特征;Q型聚类将175株植株划分为7个类群,明确萼片状花被片存在与否、花瓣状花被片数量与颜色、外轮花瓣状花被片姿态及花型、叶型为种质分类的核心指标。望春玉兰实生群体表型多样性丰富,本研究结果可为其种质资源保护、评价及优异单株筛选提供科学依据。

本文引用格式

秦梦瑶, 王 晶, 李玉萍, 刘青发, 黄 杰, 王亚玲 . 望春玉兰表型性状多样性研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2026 , 55(3) : 351 -361 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2026.03.009

Abstract

In order to reveal the phenotypic diversity characteristics of Yulania biondii, this study selected 175 twelve-year-old seed-grown individuals as materials, systematically determined 33 phenotypic traits of flowers, leaves and fruits for two consecutive years, and carried out research adopting diversity index, coefficient of variation, principal component analysis and cluster analysis. The results showed that the diversity indices of 20 qualitative and pseudo-qualitative traits ranged from 0.26 to 1.52, with floral traits having the highest diversity level, followed by fruit traits and leaf traits; the coefficients of variation of 13 quantitative traits were 9.73% to 24.45%, and pedicel length, stipule scar length and fruit length were the traits with the highest variation degree in corresponding parts respectively. Correlation analysis of quantitative traits showed that 19 trait combinations were significantly or extremely significantly correlated. Twelve principal components were extracted with a cumulative contribution rate of 73.01%, and the first three principal components respectively reflected the variation characteristics of floral morphology and color, leaf morphology and filament color. Q-mode cluster analysis classified 175 Y. biondii individuals into 7 groups. It confirmed that the presence or absence of sepaloid tepals, the quantity and color of petaloid tepals, the posture of outer whorl petaloid tepals, flower shape and leaf shape were the core indicators for the classification of Y. biondii germplasm resources. The seed-grown population of Y. biondii exhibits rich phenotypic diversity, and the research results can provide a scientific basis for germplasm conservation, evaluation and superior individual selection.

参考文献

[1]  Xiao Q L, Bai X L, Zhang C, He Y. Advanced high-throughput plant phenotyping techniques for genome-wide association studies: A review [J]. Journal of Advanced Research, 2021, 35: 215–230.

[2]  Fririon V, Davi H, Oddou-Muratorio S, Lebourgeois F, Lefèvre F. Within and between population phenotypic variation in growth vigor and sensitivity to drought stress in five temperate tree species [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 531: 120754.

[3]  Xie H H, Tang Y G, Fu J, Chi X L, Du W H, Dimitrov D, Liu J Q, Xi Z X, Wu J Y, Xu X T. Diversity patterns and conservation gaps of Magnoliaceae species in China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 813: 152665.

[4]  Barbosa J C J, Caruzo M B R, Simões A R G, Samain M-S. Taxonomic revision of the native Magnolia (Magnoliaceae) species of Brazil [J]. PhytoKeys, 2024, 238: 33–64.

[5]  Yang M, Shi S G, Liu W, Zhang M, Gou L, Kang Y X, Liu J J. Phenotypic variation and diversity of Magnolia sprengeri Pamp. in native habitat [J]. Genetics and Molecular Research, 2015, 14(2): 6495–6508.

[6]  袁丛军, 李鹤, 陈锐, 余德会. 珍稀植物西康玉兰的果实性状特征及其表型多样性[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(8): 142–148.

[7]  陈俐洁, 党万园, 陈巍巍, 邱涛,陈小红. 珍稀濒危植物峨眉含笑种实表型性状的空间变异特征[J]. 植物研究, 2023, 43(1): 100–108.

[8]  Gutiérrez-Lozano M, Vázquez-García J A, Reyes Ortiz J L, Octavio-Aguilar P, Galván-Hernández D M, Sánchez-González A. Foliar, floral and fruit morphology variation in Magnolia mexicana (DC.) G. Don (Talauma Section, Magnoliaceae) in Mexico [J]. Botanical Sciences, 2021, 99(4): 955–975.

[9]  Wu Z Y, Raven P H, Hong D Y. Flora of China(Vol.7) [M]. Beijing: Science Press &St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 2008.

[10]  郭乐, 康永祥, 邢振杰, 杨玲, 郭健, 李娜. 望春玉兰种质资源遗传多样性ISSR分析[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(4): 465–473.

[11]  靳晓白, 周建仁, 黄发吉, 王琼, 李东方, 许心, 程红焱, 王伟青. LY/T 2097–2013植物新品种特异性、一致性、稳定性测试指南 木兰属[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013.

[12]  宋杰, 李世峰, 刘丽娜, 李树发, 解玮佳, 关文灵. 云南含笑天然居群的表型多样性分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(2): 272–279.

[13]  杜习武, 叶康, 秦俊, 胡永红. 玉兰品种花色表型数量分类研究[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(11): 68–73.

[14]  贺窑青, 马履一, 桑子阳. 红花玉兰花色形成的初步研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2010, 30(11): 2252–2257.

[15]  Koski M H, Ashman T L. Macro evolutionary patterns of ultraviolet floral pigmentation explained by geography and associated bioclimatic factors [J]. New Phytologist, 2016, 211(2): 708–718.

[16]  何栋, 吴伟煌, 董明亮, 蓝扬辉, 唐光大, 杨锦昌. 厚叶木莲的种实性状及幼苗生长变异[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2024, 44 (1): 85–94.

[17]  孙泽硕, 李永华, 柳新红, 沈鑫, 李因刚, 蒋冬月. 四十一份樱花品种资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2022(22): 57–66.

[18]  汤肖玮, 衡燕, 刘晨, 邵和平, 曲晓慧, 夏明霞, 张宁宁. 基于22个表型性状的朱顶红种质多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2026, 31(4): 137–151.

[19]  唐浩君, 司马永康. 紫玉兰和二乔玉兰花部形态的变异研究[J]. 现代园艺, 2017 (7): 13–17.

文章导航

/

〈 〉