以番茄Solanum lycopersicum为宿主，在pH 4.5和pH 6.5条件下分别接种3种丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)，即根内球囊霉Rhizophagus irregularis、珠状巨孢囊霉Gigaspora margarita和脆无梗囊霉Acaulospora delicata，探讨低pH对AMF在根系中的丛枝形成和功能的影响。结果表明，低pH能够显著抑制AMF对根系的侵染以及丛枝的形成；3个菌种之间存在差异，表现为珠状巨孢囊霉的侵染强度最高，根内球囊霉的丛枝丰度对低pH最敏感；AMF显著增加番茄的生物量，降低其根冠比；番茄在pH 6.5的菌根依赖性低于在pH 4.5的对应值，对根内球囊霉的菌根依赖性最低；低pH对碱性磷酸酶(ALP)活性的影响与根系侵染有相似的模式；AMF显著提高地上部磷含量，增强根系LePT4的表达，但pH的影响并不显著。以上结果表明，低pH对AMF与植物共生关系的建立和维持有一定的抑制作用，低pH胁迫条件下AMF的促生作用更大，不同AMF菌种/菌株提高植株低pH抗性的能力存在差异。
Tomato inoculated with 3 AMF species, Rhizophagus irregularis, Gigaspora margarita and Acaulospora delicata, at different pH values (4.5 or 6.5), the influences of low pH on the arbuscule formation and function of AMF in tomato roots were investigated. The results indicated that low pH significantly inhibited the AMF colonization and the arbuscule formation in roots. Three AMF species varied greatly with G. margarita showing the highest colonization and R. irregularis showing the most sensitive arbuscule abundance to low pH. AMF significantly elevated the plant biomass and decreased the root to shoot ratio. The effects of low pH on alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity shared the similar pattern with those on root colonization. AMF significantly increased the shoot phosphorus content and the LePT4 expression in roots; however, pH did not affect them. These results suggested that low pH was inhibitory to the establishment and maintenance of AMF-host symbiosis, and the beneficial effects of AMF was greater at low pH. Moreover, different AMF species/isolates could vary greatly in the ability to increase the resistance of hosts to low pH.
[1] 何园球,孙波. 红壤质量演变与调控[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
[2] Seguel A, Cumming J, Cornejo P, Borie F. Aluminum tolerance of wheat cultivars and relation to arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization in a non-limed and limed Andisol[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2016,108: 228—237.
[3] Seguel A, Barea J M, Cornejo P, Borie F. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in phosphorus-uptake efficiency and aluminium tolerance in barley growing in acid soils[J]. Crop and Pasture Science, 2015,66: 696—705.
[4] Marschner H. Mechanisms of adaption of plants to acid soils[M]// Wright R J, Baligar V C, Murrmann R P. Plant-soil Interactions at Low pH. Beckley, West Virginia: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991: 683—702.
[5] Yokota S, Ojima K. Physiological response of root tip of alfalfa to low pH and aluminium stress in water culture[J]. Plant and Soil, 1995,171: 163—165.
[6] Hirano Y, Hijii N. Effects of low pH and aluminum on root morphology of Japanese red cedar saplings[J]. Environmental Pollution, 1998,101: 339—347.
[7] Clark R B. Differences among mycorrhizal fungi for mineral uptake per root length of switchgrass grown in acidic soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2002,25(8): 1753—1772.
[8] Yang S, Paszkowski U. Phosphate import at the arbuscule: just a nutrient?[J]. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interaction, 2011,24: 1296—1299.
[9] Phillips J, Hayman D. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection[J]. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 1970,55(1): 158—161.
[10] Trouvelot A, Kough J, Gianinazzi-Pearson V. Mesure du taux de mycorhization VA d’un systeme radiculaire. Recherche de methodes d’Estimation ayant une signification fonctionnelle[C]// Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S. Physiological and Genetical Aspects of Mycorrhizae. Proceedings of the 1st European Symposium on Mycorrhizae. Paris: INRA Press, 1986: 217—221.
[11] Tisserant B, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S, Gollotte A. In planta histochemical staining of fungal alkaline phosphatase activity for analysis of efficient arbuscular mycorrhizal infections[J]. Mycological Research, 1993,97(2): 245—250.
[12] Zhu H H, Yao Q, Sun X T, Hu Y L. Colonization, ALP activity and plant growth promotion of native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at low pH[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2007,39(4): 942—950.
[13] Chen A, Hu J, Sun S, Xu G. Conservation and divergence of both phosphate- and mycorrhiza-regulated physiological responses and expression patterns of phosphate transporters in solanaceous species[J]. New Phytologist, 2007,173: 817—831.
[14] Fiorilli V, Catoni M, Miozzi L, Novero M, Accotto G P. Global and cell-type gene expression profiles in tomato plants colonized by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus[J]. New Phytologist, 2009,184(4): 975—987.
[15] Smith S E, Read D J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis[M]. London: Elsevier , 2008.
[16] Gomez S K, Javot H, Deewatthanawong P, Torres-Jerez I, Tang Y, Blancaflor E B, Udvardi M K, Harrison M J. Medicago truncatula and Glomus intraradices gene expression in cortical cells harboring arbuscules in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2009,9: 10.
[17] Yano K, Takaki M. Mycorrhizal alleviation of acid soil stress in the sweet potato(Ipomoea batatas)[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2005,37: 1569—1572.
[18] Hijikata N, Murase M, Tani C, Ohtomo R, Osaki M, Ezawa T. Polyphos-phate has a central role in the rapid and massive accumulation of phosphorusin extraradical mycelium of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus[J]. New Phytologist, 2010,186: 285—289.
[19] Ohtomo R, Saito M. Polyphosphate dynamics in mycorrhizal roots during colonization of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus[J]. New Phytologist, 2005,167: 571—578.
[20] 蔡彬,姚青,王燕,朱俊晨,朱红惠. 低pH对AM真菌侵染三叶草根系的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2008,29(3): 33—36.
[21] Zhang S, Zhou J, Wang G, Wang X, Liao H. The role of mycorrhizal symbiosis in aluminum and phosphorus interactions in relation to aluminum tolerance in soybean[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015,99(23): 10 225—10 235.
[22] Nagy R, Karandashov V, Chague V, Bucheret M. The characterization of novel mycorrhiza-specific phosphate transporters from Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum tuberosum uncovers functional redundancy in symbiotic phosphate transport in solanaceous species[J]. The Plant Journal, 2005,42(2): 236—250.
闽公网安备 35020602000789号