17个春兰品种叶片叶绿素含量和解剖结构比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2026.01.005

亚热带植物科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 49-56.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2026.01.005

17个春兰品种叶片叶绿素含量和解剖结构比较

李钰嫣¹，吴杭海²，刘梓淳¹，汤思颖¹，李思璇¹，艾叶^1*

(1. 福建农林大学风景园林与艺术学院，福建福州 350002；2. 福建农林大学金山学院，福建福州 350002)

收稿日期:2025-09-12 接受日期:2025-12-25 出版日期:2026-02-28 发布日期:2026-02-28
通讯作者: 艾叶
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFD1600500)

Comparison of Chlorophyll Content and Anatomical Structure of Leaves in 17 Cymbidium goeringii Varieties

LI Yu-yan¹, WU Hang-hai², LIU Zi-chun¹, TANG Si-ying¹, LI Si-xuan¹, AI Ye^1*

(1. College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian China; 2. Jinshan College of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian China)

Received:2025-09-12 Accepted:2025-12-25 Online:2026-02-28 Published:2026-02-28
Contact: AI Ye

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 比较春兰Cymbidium goeringii不同品种叶片叶绿素含量和解剖结构，为其栽培管理、品种改良及叶片功能分析提供基础数据和理论参考。选取17个春兰品种，应用SPAD叶绿素仪法、指甲油法和徒手切片法，观测记录各品种叶片的叶绿素含量、气孔结构和横切结构。结果表明，春兰品种的叶绿素含量存在显著差异，SPAD值范围在43.07～67.84之间，其中‘锦绣中华’的SPAD值最低，‘绿瑛’的SPAD值最高。春兰叶片气孔结构显示，‘锦绣中华’的气孔长轴最小，‘雪山’的最大；‘大团圆’的气孔短轴和气孔面积均最小，‘小打梅’的气孔短轴和气孔面积均最大；‘雪山’的气孔密度最小，‘环球’的最大。春兰叶片横切结构显示，‘大团圆’的上表皮厚度最小，‘龙字’的最大；‘锦绣中华’的下表皮厚度最小，‘中华一品梅’的最大；‘天彭牡丹’的叶脉长轴最小，‘小打梅’的叶脉短轴最小，‘大元宝’的叶脉长轴和叶脉短轴均最大；‘锦绣中华’的叶片厚度最小，‘余蝴蝶’的叶肉厚度最小，‘桂圆’的叶片厚度和叶肉厚度均最大。相关性分析显示，春兰叶片指标间存在不同程度的相关性，春兰SPAD值与叶片厚度呈极显著正相关，与叶脉短轴、叶肉厚度呈显著正相关；气孔面积与气孔长轴、气孔短轴呈极显著正相关，与叶脉短轴呈显著负相关；叶脉长轴与叶脉短轴呈极显著正相关；叶片厚度与叶肉厚度呈极显著正相关。17个春兰品种的叶绿素含量和解剖结构具有显著差异，表明品种间光合能力和抗逆性可能存在较大差异。

关键词: 春兰, 叶绿素, SPAD值, 气孔, 横切结构

Abstract: The chlorophyll content and anatomical structure of leaves of different varieties of Cymbidium goeringii were compared to provide basic data and theoretical reference for their cultivation management, variety improvement and leaf function analysis. Seventeen varieties of C. goeringii were selected to determine the chlorophyll content, stomatal structure and cross-sectional structure of their leaves by using the SPAD chlorophyll meter method, nail polish method and freehand sectioning method. The results showed that there were significant differences in chlorophyll content among the varieties of C. goeringii, with SPAD values ranging from 43.07 to 67.84. Among them, the SPAD value of 'Jinxiu Zhonghua' was the lowest and that of 'Lvying' was the highest. The stomatal structure of leaves of C. goeringii showed that the stomatal long axis of 'Jinxiu Zhonghua' was the smallest and that of 'Xueshan' was the largest; the stomatal short axis and stomatal area of 'Datuanyuan' were the smallest and those of 'Xiaodamei' were the largest; the stomatal density of 'Xueshan' was the smallest and that of 'Huanqiu' was the largest. The cross-sectional structure of leaves of C. goeringii showed that the upper epidermis thickness of 'Datuanyuan' was the smallest and that of 'Longzi' was the largest; the lower epidermis thickness of 'Jinxiu Zhonghua' was the smallest and that of 'Zhonghua Yipinmei' was the largest; the long axis of leaf vein of 'Tianpeng Mudan' was the smallest, the short axis of leaf vein of 'Xiaodamei' was the smallest, and the long axis and short axis of leaf vein of 'Dayuanbao' were the largest; the leaf thickness of 'Jinxiu Zhonghua' was the smallest, the mesophyll thickness of 'Yuhuadie' was the smallest, and the leaf thickness and mesophyll thickness of 'Guiyuan' were the largest. The correlation analysis revealed varying degrees of correlation among the leaf indicators of C. goeringii. The SPAD value showed a highly significant positive correlation with leaf thickness, and significant positive correlations with short axis of leaf vein and mesophyll thickness. The stomatal area demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation with stomatal long axis and stomatal short axis, while showing a significant negative correlation with short axis of leaf vein. The long axis of leaf vein exhibited a highly significant positive correlation with short axis of leaf vein. The leaf thickness demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation with mesophyll thickness. There were significant differences in chlorophyll content and anatomical structure among seventeen varieties of C. goeringii, indicating that there might be significant differences in photosynthetic capacity and stress resistance among the varieties.

Key words: Cymbidium goeringii, chlorophyll, SPAD value, stomata, cross-sectional structure

中图分类号:

Q945

李钰嫣, 吴杭海, 刘梓淳, 汤思颖, 李思璇, 艾叶. 17个春兰品种叶片叶绿素含量和解剖结构比较[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2026, 55(1): 49-56.

LI Yu-yan, WU Hang-hai, LIU Zi-chun, TANG Si-ying, LI Si-xuan, AI Ye. Comparison of Chlorophyll Content and Anatomical Structure of Leaves in 17 Cymbidium goeringii Varieties[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2026, 55(1): 49-56.

参考文献

[1] 许东生. 中国春兰名品赏培[M]. 辽宁: 辽宁科学技术出版社, 2007: 1–99.

[2] 陈心启. 国兰及其品种全书[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2011: 1–42.

[3] 罗毅波, 贾建生, 王春玲. 中国兰科植物保育的现状和展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2003, 11(1): 70–77.

[4] 秦卫华, 蒋明康, 徐网谷, 贺昭和. 中国1334种兰科植物就地保护状况评价[J]. 生物多样性, 2012, 20(2): 177–183.

[5] 张殷波, 杜昊东, 金效华, 马克平. 中国野生兰科植物物种多样性与地理分布[J]. 科学通报, 2015, 60(2): 179–188.

[6] 饶爱, 王悦云, 丁宁, 吴东波, 周永鑫. 兰属植物春兰资源保护与栽培驯化研究[J]. 世界热带农业信息, 2024(5): 77–79.

[7] 赵雪梅, 潘远智, 关朝玺. 国兰光合生理生态研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2010(7): 212–216.

[8] 周丹, 罗灿, 于旭东, 蔡泽坪, 吴繁花. 波罗蜜叶片突变体叶绿素含量测定和超微结构观察[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(10): 2935–2941.

[9] 叶景秀, 杜德志. 甘蓝型油菜叶片叶绿素含量测定方法的优化及不同时期叶绿素含量比较[J]. 青海大学学报, 2024, 42(5): 56–60.

[10] 杨志莹, 张海良, 王胜, 邱玉宾, 赵庆柱, 高静, 袁永. 盐胁迫下丁香叶绿素含量与SPAD值相关性分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(9): 8–12.

[11] 项倩, 吴磊, 徐若涵, 杨再强. 不同温度下染病番茄叶片SPAD和叶绿素含量的相关性[J]. 北方园艺, 2022(18): 8–15.

[12] 贾良良, 陈新平, 张福锁. 作物氮营养诊断的无损测试技术[J]. 世界农业, 2001(6): 36–37.

[13] 楼柏丹, 姚岚. 几种观察植物表皮气孔方法的比较[J]. 生物学教学, 2015, 40(9): 42–43.

[14] 张书敏, 刘红云, 程金金, 冯丹忆, 刘征. 快速徒手切片法观察谷子和水稻叶片显微结构[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2015, 34(7): 1527–1530.

[15] 赵考诚, 叶迎, 马军, 钱天陈, 黄丽芬, 庄恒扬. 水稻花后叶片SPAD值动态模型与特征分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(16): 74–80.

[16] 李秀, 李刘龙, 李慕嵘, 尹立俊, 王小燕. 不同小麦品种旗叶叶绿素含量、叶片显微结构及产量对花后遮光的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 286–294.

[17] 徐艳芳, 贺雅萍, 王梦瑶, 张琪, 周杰, 兰琳英, 艾叶. 16个建兰品种叶片解剖结构研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2022, 43(10): 2099–2105.

[18] 喇燕菲, 邓建智, 覃耿敏, 孙明艳, 郑亦卿, 卢家仕. 6个铁线莲品种叶片解剖结构与植株耐热性的比较[J]. 分子植物育种, 2024, 22(16): 5424–5433.

[19] 胡衍平, 刘卫东, 张珉, 陈明皋, 程勇, 魏志恒, 庞文胜, 吴际友. 山乌桕家系叶片叶色参数和色素含量及其解剖结构研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 49(2): 123–133.

[20] 雷跃, 林迓, 高爱平, 刘凡值, 刘清国, 张正学. 14份芒果种质资源叶片解剖结构特征及抗旱性综合评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2025, 38(2): 250–258.

[21] Wang G J, Zeng F L, Song P, Sun B, Wang Q, Wang J Y. Effects of reduced chlorophyll content on photosystem functions and photosynthetic electron transport rate in rice leaves [J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2022, 272: 153669.

[22] Croft H, Chen J M, Luo X, Bartlett P, Chen B, Staebler R M. Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity [J]. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23(9): 3513–3524.

[23] Zhou Z X, Struik P C, Gu J F, Peter E L, Wang Z Q, Yin X Y, Yang J C. Enhancing leaf photosynthesis from altered chlorophyll content requires optimal partitioning of nitrogen [J]. Crop and Environment, 2023, 2(1): 24–36.

[24] Nunes T D G, Zhang D, Raissig M T. Form, development and function of grass stomata [J]. The Plant Journal, 2020, 101(4): 780–799.

[25] Lawson T, Matthews J. Guard cell metabolism and stomatal function [J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2020, 71: 273–302.

[26] Xu Y , Ookawa T, lshihara K. Analysis of the photosynthetic characteristics of the high-yielding rice cultivar Takanari [J]. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 1997, 66(4): 616–623.

[27] Takai T, Kondo M, Yano M, Yamamoto T. A quantitative trait locus for chlorophyll content and its association with leaf photosynthesis in rice [J]. Rice, 2010, 3: 172–180.

[28] 宋莎, 江旭生, 韩秀梅, 郑伟, 吴亚维. 不同苹果砧木叶绿素含量与光合速率研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(3): 149–150.

[29] 顾骏飞, 周振翔, 李志康, 戴琪星, 孔祥胜, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 水稻低叶绿素含量突变对光合作用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(4): 551–560.

[30] 李爱民, 陈泽濂, 孙谷畴, 叶秀麟. 墨兰组织培养植株的叶结构和生理特性[J]. 生命科学研究, 2002(1): 68–73.

[31] Tanaka Y, Sugano S S, Shimada T, Hara-Nishimura I. Enhancement of leaf photosynthetic capacity through increased stomatal density in Arabidopsis [J]. New Phytologist, 2013, 198(3): 757–764.

[32] 金玉, 郭新宇, 张颖, 李大壮, 王璟璐. 玉米叶片气孔表型鉴定及研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2023(6): 1–10.

[33] Ennajeh M, Vadel A M, Cochard H, Khemira H. Comparative impacts of water stress on the leaf anatomy of a drought- resistant and a drought-sensitive olive cultivar [J]. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 2010, 85(4): 289–294.

[34] Nobel P S, Hartsock T L. Development of leaf thickness for Plectranthus parviflorus-influence of photosynthetically active radiation [J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1981, 51(2): 163–166.

[35] Liu W S, Zheng L, Qi D H. Variation in leaf traits at different altitudes reflects the adaptive strategy of plants to environmental changes [J]. Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 10(15): 8166–8175.

[36] 张英杰, 刘学庆, 张京伟, 郭文姣, 刘述河, 初美静, 孙纪霞. 兜兰叶片结构与抗旱性关联的研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2017, 44(6): 1104–1111.

[37] 何荆洲, 黄昌艳, 闫海霞, 覃耿敏, 卜朝阳. 25个蝴蝶兰品种气孔特征及其相关性研究和分类学意义[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(11): 2661–2669.

编辑推荐

Metrics

闽ICP备11008787号-5　

17个春兰品种叶片叶绿素含量和解剖结构比较

Comparison of Chlorophyll Content and Anatomical Structure of Leaves in 17 Cymbidium goeringii Varieties

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王云锦, 王晋, 杨璨华, 张金玲, 何紫玉. 不同光斑环境对海南凤仙花叶片解剖结构及光合特性的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2026, 55(1): 37-48.
[2]	许少亮, 任群星, 陶勇, 蔡俊煌, 卞阿娜, 姚昕卓, 张佳佳. 漳州市6种园林灌木秋季光合特性及固碳能力研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2025, 54(6): 645-652.
[3]	石俣, 王云锦, 李和芹, 张培兰, 钟云芳, 宋希强, 张金玲. 海南凤仙花叶片光合特性及解剖结构对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2025, 54(4): 387-397.
[4]	曾艳华，龙蔷宇，何荆洲，李秀玲，范继征，卜朝阳. 春兰×‘寒香梅’试管开花诱导及其生理基础[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2021, 50(04): 245-250.
[5]	唐录艳，陈泽宇，戴尊，姚雪，庄李婕，朱毛洁，彭涛，王健. 不同海拔短肋羽藓叶绿素含量与光合效率研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2021, 50(04): 251-256.
[6]	倪建中，罗倩，陈小宇，代色平，王伟. 木棉叶片叶绿素荧光参数和SPAD值对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2021, 50(04): 257-261.
[7]	叶小萍，黄永芳，谭莎，李孟南，戴秋月. 油茶扦插生根的生化特性[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2021, 50(02): 101-105.
[8]	周杰，杨钰明，兰琳英，徐艳芳，郑清冬，谢泰祥，艾叶. 17个建兰品种光合特性分析[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2020, 49(05): 329-334.
[9]	谢泰祥，姚荣荣，陈娟，陈璐，艾叶. 建兰叶艺品种光合色素含量及叶绿素荧光特性分析[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2019, 48(03): 232-236.
[10]	张伟，高雪笛，丁晓璐，孙莉玮，庄李婕，王竞挺，彭涛，刘行行，唐录艳. 六种叶状体苔藓植物叶绿素含量和光合效率研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2018, 47(04): 312-316.
[11]	肖文芳,李佐,陈和明,蒋明殿,吕复兵. 西藏林芝地区蝴蝶兰设施种植适应性研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2017, 46(4): 343-346.
[12]	黄小凤,韦阳连,余金昌,田海娟,袁志永. 14个荔枝品种的叶片性状分析[J]. , 2017, 46(02): 126-130.
[13]	廖雪兰,廖科,文国琴,王梅,冯昊,张莉,潘远智. 航天诱变凤仙花叶片形态特性初探[J]. , 2017, 46(02): 163-166.
[14]	张苇,陈粤超,尚秀华,许方宏,吴志华. 5种红树林植物叶片SPAD值比较[J]. , 2016, 45(03): 212-215.
[15]	陈维,金晨钟,吴晓峰,柏连阳,彭琼. 不同浓度镉胁迫对稗草生理特性的影响[J]. , 2016, 45(03): 207-211.