邻体密度和生境异质性共同驱动高黎贡山中山湿性常绿阔叶林幼苗多度

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2024.02.001

亚热带植物科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (2): 89-99.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2024.02.001

• 研究论文 • 下一篇

邻体密度和生境异质性共同驱动高黎贡山中山湿性常绿阔叶林幼苗多度

王丽萍1，乌俊杰1*，柴勇2,3,4，于小莉1，孙继文1，冯哲1，陈凤仙1

(1. 大理大学农学与生物科学学院，云南大理 671003； 2. 云南省林业和草原科学院，云南昆明 650201；3. 云南省高黎贡山生物多样性重点实验室，云南昆明 650201；4. 高黎贡山森林生态系统云南省野外科学观测研究站，云南昆明 650201)

收稿日期:2024-03-18 接受日期:2024-04-07 出版日期:2024-04-30 发布日期:2024-05-27
通讯作者: 乌俊杰
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31901102)

Neighbor Density and Habitat Heterogeneity Jointly Determined the Seedling Abundance in Gaoligong Mountains, Southwestern China

WANG Li-ping1, WU Jun-jie1*, CHAI Yong2,3,4, YU Xiao-li1, SUN Ji-wen1, FENG Zhe1, CHEN Feng-xian1

(1. College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, Dali University, Dali 671003, Yunnan China; 2. Yunnan Academy of Forestry and Grassland, Kunming 650201, Yunnan China; 3. Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming 650201, Yunnan China; 4. Gaoligong Mountain Forest Ecosystem Observation and Research Station of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650201, Yunnan China)

Received:2024-03-18 Accepted:2024-04-07 Online:2024-04-30 Published:2024-05-27
Contact: WU Jun-jie

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究高黎贡山中山湿性常绿阔叶林4 hm2内胸径(DBH) <1 cm的幼苗多度的关键影响因素，利用广义线性混合模型在群落水平和物种水平分析邻体密度和生境因子是否影响幼苗多度，制约强度是否因时间而异。结果显示：(1) 群落水平上的总物种幼苗多度与邻体密度和生境因子的相关性随时间增加；常见种幼苗多度与异种大树邻体密度正相关呈显著增加趋势，与环境因子无相关性；稀有种幼苗多度与邻体密度和环境因子均无显著性。(2) 在物种水平上，聚果九节Psychotria morindoides幼苗多度仅在2022年与海拔和凸度分别呈边缘显著负相关和正相关；邻体效应和环境异种性对针齿铁仔Myrsine semiserrata幼苗多度在2020～2023年有显著正效应，表明存在正密度制约效应；在较高林冠开度、海拔和土壤含钾生境下，幼苗多度较高；而铜绿山矾Symplocos stellaris var. aenea幼苗多度在4个时段与邻体密度和环境因子均无显著相关性。研究表明，高黎贡山幼苗多度格局同时受到邻体密度和生境因子影响，这种影响强度在不同水平、物种和时空格局中差异显著，影响因素的相对重要性维持着该样地群落多样性。

关键词: 高黎贡山, 邻体密度, 生境异质性, 幼苗多度, 广义线性混合模型

Abstract: To understand the crucial dependency factors of seedling abundance with a diameter at breast height (DBH) <1 cm in a mid-montane moist evergreen broad-leaved forest of 4 hm2 Gaoligong Mountains forest. The generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze whether neighbor density and habitat factors shaped seedling abundance at the community and species level, and whether the strength of them varied with temporal. The results showed that: (1) The effect of neighbor density and habitat factors on all seedling abundance were significant and gradually strengthen at the community level. The positive correlation of common species with heterospecific neighbor density increased significantly, while no correlation with environmental factors. The seedling abundance of rare species reflected non-significant with neighbor density and environmental factors. (2) At species level, the seedling abundance of Psychotria morindoides was only slightly and significantly negatively associated with elevation in 2022. From 2020 to 2023, the significant positive effects of biotic and habitat heterogeneity on seedling abundance of Myrsine semiserrata. The higher canopy openness, elevation, and soil total potassium and temperatures, the higher seedling abundance. However, these correlations were non-significant on the seedling abundance of Symplocos stellaris var. aenea in the four periods. This study indicated that the seedling abundance is driven by both neighbor density and habitat heterogeneity. The strength of neighbor densities and habitat factors differs greatly among community, species and temporals, which relative importance of variables can maintain the community diversity in the plot.

Key words: Gaoligong Mountains, neighbor density, habitat heterogeneity, seedling abundance, generalized linear mixed model

中图分类号:

Q948

王丽萍, 乌俊杰, 柴勇, 于小莉, 孙继文, 冯哲, 陈凤仙. 邻体密度和生境异质性共同驱动高黎贡山中山湿性常绿阔叶林幼苗多度[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2024, 53(2): 89-99.

WANG Li-ping, WU Jun-jie, CHAI Yong, YU Xiao-li, SUN Ji-wen, FENG Zhe, CHEN Feng-xian. Neighbor Density and Habitat Heterogeneity Jointly Determined the Seedling Abundance in Gaoligong Mountains, Southwestern China[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2024, 53(2): 89-99.

参考文献

[1] Janzen D H. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests [J]. The American Naturalist, 1970, 104(940): 501–528.
[2] Connell J H. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees [M]// Den Boer P J, Gradwell G R. Dynamics of Populations. PUDOC: Wageningen, the Netherlands: 1971, 298–312.
[3] Comita L S, Muller-Landau H C, Aguilar S, Hubbell S P. Asymmetric density dependence shapes species abundances in a tropical tree community [J]. Science, 2010, 329(5989): 330–332.
[4] Comita L S, Queenborough S A, Murphy S J, Eck J L, Xu K, Krishnadas M, Beckman N, Zhu Y. Testing predictions of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence for distance- and density-dependent seed and seedling survival [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2014, 102(4): 845–856.
[5] Lin L X, Comita L S, Zheng Z, Cao M. Seasonal differentiation in density-dependent seedling survival in a tropical rain forest [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100(4): 905–914.
[6] Hubbell S P, Ahumada J A, Condit R, Foster R B. Local neighborhood effects on long-term survival of individual trees in a neotropical forest [J]. Ecological Research, 2001, 16(5): 859–875.
[7] Zhu Y, Queenborough S A, Condit R, Hubbell S P, Ma K P, Comita L S. Density-dependent survival varies with species life-history strategy in a tropical forest [J]. Ecology Letters, 2018, 21(4): 506–515.
[8] Mensah S, Lokossou C J M, Assogbadjo A E, Kaka? R G. Seasonal variation of environment and conspecific density-dependence effects on early seedling growth of a tropical tree in semi-arid savannahs [J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2023, 43: e02455.
[9] Harms K E, Wright S J, Calderon O, Hernandez A, Herre E A. Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest [J]. Nature, 2000, 404(6777): 493–495.
[10] Zhu K, Woodall C W, Monteiro J V, Clark J S. Prevalence and strength of density-dependent tree recruitment [J]. Ecology, 2015, 96(9): 2319–2327.
[11] Bachelot B, Kobe R K, Vriesendorp C. Negative density dependent mortality varies over time in a wet tropical forest, advantaging rare species, common species, or no species [J]. Oecologia, 2015, 179(3): 853–861.
[12] Metz M R, Sousa W P, Valencia R. Widespread density-dependent seedling mortality promotes species coexistence in a highly diverse Amazonian rain forest [J]. Ecology, 2010, 91(12): 3675–3685.
[13] Johnson D J, Beaulieu W T, Bever J D, Clay K. Conspecific Negative Density Dependence and Forest Diversity [J]. Science, 2012, 336(6083): 904–907.
[14] Mangan S A, Schnitzer S A, Herre E A, Mack K M L, Valencia M C, Sanchez E I, Bever J D. Negative plant-soil feedback predicts tree–species relative abundance in a tropical forest [J]. Nature, 2010, 466(7307): 752–755.
[15] Novotny V, Drozd P, Miller S E, Kulfan M, Janda M, Basset Y, Weiblen G D. Response to Comment on "Why Are There So Many Species of Herbivorous Insects in Tropical Rainforests?" [J]. Science, 2007, 315(5819): 1666.
[16] Bagchi R, Gallery R E, Gripenberg S, Gurr S J, Narayan L, Addis C E, Freckleton R P, Lewis O T. Pathogens and insect herbivores drive rainforest plant diversity and composition [J]. Nature, 2014, 506(7486): 85–88.
[17] Bever J D, Westover K M, Antonovics J. Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: The utility of the feedback approach [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1997, 85(5): 561–573.
[18] Wright S J. Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence [J]. Oecologia, 2002, 130(1): 1–14.
[19] Comita L S, Condit R, Hubbell S P. Developmental changes in habitat associations of tropical trees [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2007, 95(3): 482–492.
[20] Metz M R. Does habitat specialization by seedlings contribute to the high diversity of a lowland rain forest? [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100(4): 969–979.
[21] Hubbell S P, Foster R B. Commonness and rarity in a neotropical rainforest: implications for tropical tree conservation [M]// Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer Press Associates, 1986.
[22] Grubb P J. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche [J]. Biological Reviews Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1977, 55(1): 107–145.
[23] Harpole W S. Tilman D. Non-neutral patterns of species abundance in grassland communities [J]. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9(1): 15–23.
[24] LaManna J A, Walton M L, Turner B L, Myers J A. Negative density dependence is stronger in resource-rich environments and diversifies communities when stronger for common but not rare species [J]. Ecology Letters, 2016, 19(6): 657–667.
[25] 柴勇, 孟广涛, 和丽萍, 袁春明, 邵金平, 李品荣, 李贵祥. 高黎贡山中山湿性常绿阔叶林树种的分布格局及其地形影响因子[J]. 广西植物, 2017, 37(12): 1508–1520.
[26] 吴征镒. 云南植被[M]. 北京: 科学出版社: 1987, 97–143.
[27] 孟广涛, 柴勇, 袁春明, 艾怀森, 李贵祥, 王骞, 李品荣, 蔺汝涛. 云南高黎贡山中山湿性常绿阔叶林的群落特征[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(3): 144–151.
[28] Canham C D, Lepage P T, Coates K D. A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition: effects of shading versus crowding. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2004, 34(4): 778–787.
[29] Wu J J, Swenson N G, Brown C, Zhang C C, Yang J, Ci X Q, Li J, Sha L Q, Cao M, Lin L X. How does habitat filtering affect the detection of conspecific and phylogenetic density dependence? [J]. Ecology, 2016, 97(5): 1182–1193.
[30] Ridler T W, Calvard S. Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 1978, 8(8): 630–632.
[31] Murphy S J, Wiegand T, Comita L S. Distance-dependent seedling mortality and long–term spacing dynamics in a neotropical forest community [J]. Ecology Letters, 2017, 20(1): 1469–1478.
[32] Chen L, Swenson N, Ji N, Mi X C. Differential soil fungus accumulation and density dependence of trees in a subtropical forest [J]. Science, 2019, 366(6461): 124–128.
[33] LaManna J A, Mangan S A, Alonso A, Bourg N A, Brockelman W Y, Bunyavejchewin S, Chang L W, Chiang J M, Chuyong G B, Clay K, Condit R, Cordell S, Davies S J, Furniss T J, Giardina C P, Gunatilleke I A U N, Gunatilleke C V S, He F, Howe R W, Hubbell S P, Hsieh C F, InmanNarahari F M, Janík D, Johnson D J, Kenfack D, Korte L, Kr′al K, Larson A J, Lutz J A, McMahon S M, McShea W J, Memiaghe H R, Nathalang A, Novotny V, Ong P S, Orwig D A, Ostertag R, Parker G G, Phillips R P, Sack L, Sun I F, Tello J S, Thomas D W, Turner B L, Vela Díaz D M, Vr?ka T, Weiblen G D, Wolf A, Yap S, Myers J A. Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale [J]. Science, 2017, 356(6345): 1389–1392.
[34] Wang W T, Jiang Y, Li B H, Xi N X, Chen Y F, He D, Feng J Y, Chu C J. Species abundance is jointly determined by functional traits and negative density dependence in a subtropical forest in southern China [J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2021, 14(3): 491–503.
[35] 王明慧, 陈昭铨, 李帅锋, 黄小波, 郎学东, 胡子涵, 尚瑞广, 刘万德. 云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林不同种子扩散方式的优势种空间点格局分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 86–95.
[36] 霍兵兵, 孙哲明, 欧文慧, 毛鸿志, 胡傲, 杨予静, 李中强. 环境筛选和扩散限制对长江流域湖北段湿地植物群落构建的共同影响[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(5): 1804–1811.
[37] Peters H A. Neighbour-regulated mortality: The influence of positive and negative density dependence on tree populations in species-rich tropical forests [J]. Ecology Letters, 2003, 6(8): 757–765.
[38] Getzin S, Wiegand T, Wiegand K, He F L. Heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2008, 96(4): 807–820.
[39] 徐文秀, 路俊盟, 卢志军, 刘梦婷, 刘检明, 江明喜. 八大公山常绿落叶阔叶混交林影响幼苗存活的主要因子分析[J]．植物科学学报, 2017, 35(5): 659–666.
[40] Gaston K J, Blackburn T M, Greenwood J J D, Gregory R D, Quinn R M, Lawton J H. Abundance-occupancy relationships [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2000, 37(1): 39–59.
[41] 刘帅, 侯嫚嫚, 廖嘉星, 王均伟, 肖翠, 范秀华. 生物邻体和生境异质性共同驱动乔木幼苗存活动态[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2016, 22(4): 639–645.
[42] 邱华, 舒皓, 吴兆飞, 李明鲁, 殷正, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 长白山阔叶红松林乔木幼苗组成及多度格局的影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(6): 2049–2056.

编辑推荐

Metrics

闽ICP备11008787号-5　

邻体密度和生境异质性共同驱动高黎贡山中山湿性常绿阔叶林幼苗多度

Neighbor Density and Habitat Heterogeneity Jointly Determined the Seedling Abundance in Gaoligong Mountains, Southwestern China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	施晓春,汪建云,母其爱. 云南高黎贡山地区常见“黄连”的识别与保护[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2008, 37(01): 57-59.
[2]	沈立新. 云南高黎贡山地区野生蕨类植物药用研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2002, 31(01): 35-40.