福建红树林植物丛枝菌根侵染研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2012.01.001

亚热带植物科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01): 1-6.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2012.01.001

• 研究报告 • 下一篇

福建红树林植物丛枝菌根侵染研究

蔡邦平,董怡然,侯全,黄耀坚

1.厦门市园林植物园，福建厦门 361003；2.厦门大学生命科学学院，福建厦门 361005

收稿日期:2011-10-10 修回日期:2011-10-10 出版日期:2012-03-10 发布日期:2012-03-10
通讯作者: 蔡邦平
作者简介:蔡邦平（1969-），男，副研究员，博士，从事园林植物育种栽培及菌根研究。
基金资助:
厦门市科技项目（3502Z 20072010、3502Z 20102004）;厦门市园林植物园园长基金（BG201101）

Studies on Arbuscular Mycorrhiza infection to Mangrove Plants in Fujian

CAI Bang-ping,DONG Yi-ran,HOU Quan,HUANG Yao-jian

1.Xiamen Botanical Garden, Xiamen 361003, Fujian China; 2.School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian China

Received:2011-10-10 Revised:2011-10-10 Online:2012-03-10 Published:2012-03-10
Contact: CAI Bang-ping

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 2010年5月和12月，对福建沿海3个红树林生长区(洛阳江、九龙江口、漳江口)的红树林植物丛枝菌根（AM）侵染状况进行研究。结果表明：（1）红树林生长区中6种植物根内均发现AMF侵染结构，其中桐花树、秋茄、鱼藤和芦苇的丛枝为Arum（疆南星）型；（2）6种植物的丛枝菌根侵染率差异较大，老鼠簕的侵染率最高，鱼藤最低；（3）桐花树和秋茄的丛枝菌根侵染率呈显著差异，而其在不同生长区之间无差异；（4）桐花树和秋茄的丛枝菌根侵染率在不同时间呈显著差异，而钝草的丛枝菌根侵染率在不同时间的差异不显著。

关键词: 红树林植物, 丛枝菌根, 侵染率

Abstract: To study the symbiosis between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and mangrove plant species, 102 root and soil samples from 6 plant species were collected in three main mangroves growth zone in Fujian, in May and December of 2010. The main results showed that: (1)AMF infection structures were mostly found in the form of curled and expanded intracellular hyphae, vesicles, which were commonly associated with all the mangrove species we investigated. ‘Arum-type’ arbuscules were found in Parmentiera cerifera, Kandelia obovata, Derris trifoliata and Phragmites australis; (2)AM infection rate was different in mangrove plant species, with Acanthus ilicifolius the highest and Derris trifoliate the lowest; (3) There were significant differences of AM infection rate existing between Parmentiera cerifera and Kandelia obovata, but no difference among three sampling sites; (4) There were also significant differences of AM infection rate in different period in Parmentiera cerifera and Kandelia obovata, but no significant difference in Stenotaphrum helferi in different period.

Key words: mangrove plant, arbuscular mycorrhiza, infection rate

中图分类号:

Q948.8

蔡邦平,董怡然,侯全,黄耀坚. 福建红树林植物丛枝菌根侵染研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2012, 41(01): 1-6.

CAI Bang-ping,DONG Yi-ran,HOU Quan,HUANG Yao-jian. Studies on Arbuscular Mycorrhiza infection to Mangrove Plants in Fujian[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2012, 41(01): 1-6.

参考文献

[1] 刘润进,等. 菌根学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007: 1-447.

[2] Peter D S, et al. Efficacy of native vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi after severe soil disturbance[J]. New Phytologist, 1988,110: 347-354．

[3] Hartnett D C, et al. Mycorrhiza influence plant community structure and diversity in tall grass prairie[J]．Ecology, 1999,80: 1 187-1 195.

[4] 林鹏,等. 中国红树林环境生态及经济利用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1995.

[5] 王桂文,等. 钦州湾红树林丛枝菌根初步研究[J]. 广西植物, 2003,23(5): 445-449.

[6] Sengupta A, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal relations of mangrove plant community at the Ganges river estuary in India[J]. Mycorrhiza, 2002,12: 169-174.

[7] Kothamasi D, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizae and phosphate solubilising bacteria of the rhizosphere of the mangrove ecosystem of Great Nicobar island, India[J]. Biol Fertil Soils, 2006,42: 358-361.

[8] Kumar T, et al. Status of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the Sundarbans of India in relation to tidal inundation and chemical properties of soil[J]. Wetlands Ecol Manage, 2008,16: 471-483.

[9] 胡弘道. 红树林生态与菌根相关性之研究(一)土壤性质、菌根菌种类与菌根形态[C]. 国立台湾大学森林系研究报告, 1988: 1-21.

[10] Wang Y T, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in two mangroves in South China[J]. Plant Soil, 2010,331: 181-191.

[11] 刘维刚,等. 福建红树林区海藻的分布及季节变化[J]. 海洋学报, 2001,23(3): 78-86.

[12] Berch S M, et al. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae of southern Ontario ferns and fern-allies[J]. Mycologia, 1982,74: 769-776.

[13] McGonigle T P, et al. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi[J]. New Phytologist, 1990,11: 495-501.

[14] Brady N C. The nature and property of soils, 10th edn[M]. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York NY, 1990: 1-621.

[15] Allaway W G, et al. Gas space and oxygen exchange in roots of Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh. var. australasica (Walp.) Moldenke ex NC Duke, the grey mangrove[J]. Wetlands Ecol Manag., 2001,9: 211-218.

[16] Cooke J C, et al. Some observations on the vertical distribution of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae in roots of salt marsh grasses growing in saturated soils[J]. Mycologia1, 993,85: 547-550.

[17] Brown A M, et al. Spatial and temporal dynamics of mycorrhizas in Jaumea carnosa, a tidal salt marsh halophyte[J]. Ecol., 1996,84: 703-715.

[18] 王文卿. 中国红树林[M]. 北京：科学出版社, 2007: 1-185.

[19] 刘荣成. 中国惠安洛阳江红树林[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2010: 1-195.

[20] Malloch D W, et al. Ecological and evolutionary significance of mycorrhizal symbiosis in vascular plants(a review)[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , USA, 1980,77: 2 113-2 118.

[21] Allen M F. The ecology of mycorrhizae[J]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991: 1-118.

[22] 李晓林,等. 丛枝菌根生态生理[M]. 北京: 华文出版社, 2001: 1-358．

[23] 蔡邦平,等. 中国梅丛枝菌根侵染的调查研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2008,35(4): 599-602.

编辑推荐

Metrics

闽ICP备11008787号-5　

福建红树林植物丛枝菌根侵染研究

Studies on Arbuscular Mycorrhiza infection to Mangrove Plants in Fujian

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈猛,苏栋山,朱红惠,陈杰忠,姚青. 菌根真菌提高蓝莓抗逆性研究进展[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2018, 47(1): 88-93.
[2]	吴伟，周杨，陈杰忠，朱红惠，姚青. 柑橘园土壤中丛枝菌根真菌土著菌株的促生效应研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2018, 47(04): 327-332.
[3]	冯曾威,王宁,朱红惠,姚青. 低pH对番茄幼苗菌根丛枝形成和磷营养功能的影响[J]. , 2016, 45(04): 301-307.
[4]	许朋阳,陈伟立,朱红惠,李娟,陈杰忠,姚青. 丛枝菌根真菌、磷和生长素对枳侧根形成的调控效应[J]. , 2016, 45(03): 216-220.
[5]	吴强盛,夏仁学. 柑橘丛枝菌根形态结构观察[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2010, 39(02): 14-16.
[6]	刘进法,王鹏,罗园,谢亚超,万渊,夏仁学. 低磷胁迫下AM真菌对枳实生苗吸磷效应及根系分泌有机酸的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2010, 39(01): 9-13.
[7]	刘进法,夏仁学,王明元,王鹏. 丛枝菌根促进植物根系吸收难溶态磷的研究进展[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2007, 36(04): 62-66.
[8]	吴强盛,夏仁学. 3种农业措施对柑橘丛枝菌根发育的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2005, 34(03): 15-17.
[9]	刘建福,杨道茂,王丽娜,张勇. 丛枝菌根真菌离体培养研究概况[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2005, 34(03): 70-73.
[10]	吴强盛,周开兵,夏仁学,黄仁华,胡利明. 柑橘丛枝菌根发育状况田间调查[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2004, 33(02): 39-40.