干旱胁迫对烟草两品种幼苗生理生化特性及NtDEGP5基因表达的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2023.01.001

亚热带植物科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1): 1-8.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2023.01.001

• 植物生理生化与分子生物学 • 上一篇下一篇

干旱胁迫对烟草两品种幼苗生理生化特性及NtDEGP5基因表达的影响

舒彦淇，罗家骏，贾傛吏，段丽丽，莫泽君，刘仁祥^*

(贵州大学烟草学院，贵州贵阳 550025)

收稿日期:2022-11-21 接受日期:2023-01-16 出版日期:2023-02-28 发布日期:2023-05-08
通讯作者: 刘仁祥
基金资助:
贵州省科技厅项目([2016]5663)

Effects of Drought Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics and NtDEGP5 Gene Expression

SHU Yan-qi, LUO Jia-jun, JIA Rong-li, DUAN Li-li, MO Ze-jun, LIU Ren-xiang^*

(College of Tobacco Science of Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou China)

Received:2022-11-21 Accepted:2023-01-16 Online:2023-02-28 Published:2023-05-08
Contact: LIU Ren-xiang

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以烟草Nicotiana tabacum抗旱品种NC82和干旱敏感品种云烟87幼苗为材料，利用PEG-6000对幼苗进行干旱胁迫处理，研究干旱胁迫对烟草不同品种Fv/Fm、SOD活性、POD活性、MDA含量等生理生化指标及NtDEGP5基因表达的影响，为进一步开展NtDEGP5基因的功能研究提供依据。结果表明，干旱胁迫对烟苗的Fv/Fm、SOD活性、POD活性、MDA含量有影响，随着干旱的持续，Fv/Fm呈逐渐下降趋势，POD、SOD活性和MDA含量呈先升高后降低的趋势；不同品种对干旱胁迫的响应有差异，在干旱胁迫0～9 h，云烟87幼苗的Fv/Fm降幅大于NC82，POD、SOD活性、MDA含量的增幅小于NC82，胁迫12 h后与对照差异不显著。干旱胁迫下不同品种、不同器官间的NtDEGP5基因表达有差异，云烟87幼苗根、茎、叶中的表达量均较低，NC82幼苗根中的表达量较低，但干旱胁迫9～12 h后叶和茎的表达量较高。NC82幼苗叶片NtDEGP5基因表达量与Fv/Fm、POD活性、MDA含量呈显著正相关。Fv/Fm、SOD活性、POD活性、MDA含量可作为烟草苗期抗旱性评价指标，NtDEGP5基因表达量与抗旱评价指标显著相关，该基因可能具有抗旱性功能。

关键词: 烟草, 干旱胁迫, NtDEGP5基因, 基因表达差异分析

Abstract: To study the effects of drought stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics and the differential expression of NtDEGP5 gene in different tobacco cultivars, drought resistant variety NC82 and drought sensitive Yunyan 87 were used as materials, and PEG-6000 was used to treat seedlings with drought stress. Fv/Fm, SOD activity, POD activity, MDA content and NtDEGP5 relative expression of two tobacco cultivars were determined after treatment, so as to provide a basis for further research on the function of NtDEGP5 gene. The results showed that drought stress had effects on Fv/Fm, SOD activity, POD activity and MDA content of tobacco seedlings. As the drought continued, Fv/Fm showed a gradual decline trend, while POD, SOD activity and MDA content showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. The response of different varieties to drought stress was different. Under drought stress for 0 to 9 hours, the Fv/Fm of Yunyan 87 seedlings decreased more than that of NC82, while the POD, SOD activity and MDA content increased less than that of NC82. The difference was not significant after 12 hours of drought stress. Under drought stress, the expression of NtDEGP5 was different among varieties and organs. The expression levels in roots, stems and leaves of Yunyan 87 seedlings were very low, and that in roots of NC82 seedlings was also very low, but it was high in leaves and stems after treatment for 9–12 h. NtDEGP5 expression in leaves of NC82 was positively correlated with Fv/Fm, POD activity and MDA content. The results showed that Fv/Fm, SOD activity, POD activity and MDA content could be used as drought resistance evaluation indicators of tobacco seedlings. NtDEGP5 gene expression was significantly correlated with drought resistance evaluation indicators. It was speculated that NtDEGP5 had drought resistance function.

Key words: Nicotiana tabacumt, drought stress, NtDEGP5 gene, gene expression difference analysis

中图分类号:

Q945.78

舒彦淇, 罗家骏, 贾傛吏, 段丽丽, 莫泽君, 刘仁祥. 干旱胁迫对烟草两品种幼苗生理生化特性及NtDEGP5基因表达的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2023, 52(1): 1-8.

SHU Yan-qi, LUO Jia-jun, JIA Rong-li, DUAN Li-li, MO Ze-jun, LIU Ren-xiang. Effects of Drought Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics and NtDEGP5 Gene Expression[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2023, 52(1): 1-8.

参考文献

[1] 付士磊, 周永斌, 何兴元, 陈玮. 干旱胁迫对杨树光合生理指标的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006(11): 2016–2019.
[2] 许灵杰, 杜相革, 郑登峰. 模拟干旱胁迫对不同烤烟品种萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2014(9): 48–51.
[3] 赵莉, 周炎, 汪海燕. 干旱处理下不同烤烟品系的生理差异研究[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(3): 607–615．
[4] 李红强, 罗倩, 杨帅, 谢瑞莹. 过表达NtMYB4a基因增强烟草抗旱能力[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2022, 51(1): 13–18.
[5] 李瑾. 拟南芥叶绿体Deg1蛋白酶功能研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学博士学位论文, 2011.
[6] 张东远. 拟南芥叶绿体Deg2蛋白酶功能研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学博士学位论文, 2007.
[7] 盛业龙, 马文广, 段胜智, 郝大海, 王莎莎, 龚明. 20个烟草品种抗旱性的比较筛选与综合评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(11): 4766–4769.
[8] 吴迪, 汪志威, 刘仁祥, 王浏杰, 孟军, 赵婷婷, 莫泽君. 烟草苗期抗旱性鉴定指标筛选与评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(6): 1309–1314.
[9] 关扬扬, 郑淑心, 刘向阳, 王召军, 张洪映, 崔红, 闫筱筱. NtCycB2基因表达对烟草抗旱性的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2021, 54(3): 1–8.
[10] 赵婷婷, 陈倩, 夏志林, 王军, 喻奇伟, 王磊, 聂琼, 刘洋, 刘仁祥. Cams1基因在烟草上的同源克隆及生物信息学分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(2): 72–78.
[11] 李继新, 丁福章, 袁有波. 不同强度干旱胁迫对烤烟叶片质膜透性和丙二醛含量的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2008, 36(4): 34–35.
[12] 崔保伟, 陆引罡, 张振中. 不同生育期水分胁迫对烤烟生理特性及化学品质的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2009, 30(3): 19–23.
[13] 刘江, 李明倩, 常峻菲, 程溪晗, 王立为, 刘青, 高西宁. 干旱胁迫及复水对大豆关键生育时期叶片生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2022, 43(8): 622–632.
[14] 毛卫佳, 张会慧, 金微微. 干旱胁迫对移栽期烟草幼苗光合特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(2): 68–70.
[15] 庄晔, 刘瑞恒, 付国占, 王小东. 外源花青素对干旱胁迫下烤烟幼苗生长及其生理特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2022, 40(6): 63–71.
[16] 汪志威, 胡秋舲, 祖达, 刘仁祥. 基于称重法的7个烟草品种旺长期抗旱性评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(14): 25–30.
[17] 董环宇, 杨超群, 郭笑维, 冯月, 朴世领, 高崇. 不同抗性烟草品种(系)苗期接种PVY后生理生化指标变化[J]. 延边大学农学学报, 2022, 44(3): 29–37.
[18] Barry C S, Aldridge G M, Herzog G, Ma Q, McQuinn R P, Hirschberg J, Giovannoni J J. Altered chloroplast development and delayed fruit ripening caused by mutations in a zinc metalloprotease at the lutescent2 locus of tomato [J]. Plant Physiology, 2020, 159(3): 1086–1098.
[19] Cederholm S N, B?ckman H G, Pesaresi P, Leister D, Glaser E. Deletion of an organellar peptidasome PreP affects early development in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2019, 71(4–5): 497–508.
[20] Chang W, Hui L, Xu M, Fu A, Wang Y. Research progress of the plant chloroplast protease [J]. Genomics and Applied Biology, 2016, 35(3): 728–739.
[21] Che Y, Fu A, Hou X, Mcdonald K, Buchanan B B, Huang W, Huang W. C-terminal processing of reaction center protein D1 is essential for the function and assembly of photosystem Ⅱ in Arabidopsis [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 110(40): 16247–16252.
[22] Chen C, Wang J, Zhao X. Leaf senescence induced by EGY1 defection was partially restored by glucose in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Botanical Studies, 2015, 57(1): 1–9.
[23] Chen G, Bi Y R, Li N. EGY1 encodes a membrane-associated and ATP-independent metalloprotease that is required for chloroplast development [J]. Plant Journal, 2005, 41(3): 364–375.
[24] Chen G, Law K, Ho P, Zhang X, Li N. EGY2, a chloroplast membrane metalloprotease, plays a role in hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis [J]. Molecular Biology Reports, 2012, 39: 2147–2155.
[25] 李兆伟, 零东兰, 孙聪颖, 曾慧玲, 刘凯基, 蓝颖珊, 范凯, 林文雄. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术定向编辑水稻OsIAA11 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(13): 2699–2709.

编辑推荐

Metrics

闽ICP备11008787号-5　

干旱胁迫对烟草两品种幼苗生理生化特性及NtDEGP5基因表达的影响

Effects of Drought Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics and NtDEGP5 Gene Expression

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	田慧源, 唐博希, 王原秀, 刘帆, 郭凯阳, 刘国琴. 外源独脚金内酯对烟草腋芽伸长及独脚金内酯代谢途径相关基因表达的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2023, 52(5): 369-380.
[2]	曾荔琦, 曾嘉欣, 杨蕾蕾, 杨洋. 罗汉果伯林2号种子形态结构及萌发特性[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2023, 52(4): 293-300.
[3]	周俊成, 郭亚利, 陈发元, 张恒, 朱迪, 彭三喜, 高焕晔. 烟草根系烟碱代谢关键酶活性与基因表达对复合肥用量及其基肥比例的响应[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2022, 51(5): 331-339.
[4]	赵永菊, 欧阳胜男, 铁烈华, 崔雍, 段洪浪. 基于文献计量学的养分添加影响植物干旱响应的可视化分析[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2022, 51(5): 405-416.
[5]	梁永鑫，吴劲松. 渐狭叶烟草高效基因编辑体系的建立[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2022, 51(3): 163-171.
[6]	李红强，罗倩，杨帅，谢瑞莹，聂琼. 过表达NtMYB4a基因增强烟草抗旱能力[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2022, 51(1): 13-18.
[7]	倪建中，罗倩，陈小宇，代色平，王伟. 木棉叶片叶绿素荧光参数和SPAD值对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2021, 50(04): 257-261.
[8]	赵陆滟，李荣平，吴劲松. 渐狭叶烟草组培苗生根条件优化及在基因转化中的应用[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2021, 50(03): 175-181.
[9]	谭莎，赖路伟，黄永芳，叶小萍，谭健彬，许雄坚. 3个山茶品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2020, 49(05): 335-339.
[10]	罗岸，左紫怡，焦雄，刘夏. 烟草合子时期表达基因NtZE1的克隆及结构分析[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2019, 48(02): 103-108.
[11]	卢雅莉，吴杨熙，陈红跃. PEG模拟干旱条件下木麻黄幼苗的生理变化[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2019, 48(02): 109-113.
[12]	赖旭恩,胡德活,苏艳,张亦弛,郑会全. 干旱胁迫对杉木无性系非结构性碳水化合物含量的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2018, 47(02): 120-123.
[13]	蓝来娇,林伟通,明怡,刘玉垠,崔思明,郑明轩,吴永彬. 干旱胁迫及复水对浙江润楠幼苗生长与生理特性的影响[J]. , 2017, 46(03): 219-224.
[14]	李中华,刘进平,谷海磊,孟文艳,张燕. 干旱胁迫对植物气孔特性影响研究进展[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2016, 45(02): 195-200.
[15]	冯培勇. 辣椒抗烟草花叶病毒相关基因研究进展[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2016, 45(01): 95-100.