Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Cutting Rooting Ability of Rosa chinensis Varieties

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2024.05.009

Subtropical Plant Science ›› 2024, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 459-467.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2024.05.009

• Research articles • Previous Articles Next Articles

Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Cutting Rooting Ability of Rosa chinensis Varieties

CHEN Juan^1,2, ZHENG Tian-rui³, LI Shi-feng¹, LI Wei⁴, ZHANG Hao¹, SONG Jie^1*

(1. Flower Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Engineering Research Center for Ornamental Horticulture / Key Laboratory of Yunnan Flower Breeding, Kunming 650205, Yunnan China; 2. Institute of Qinghai-Tibet Platea, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan China; 3. College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan China; 4. Yunnan Jicheng Landscape Technology Co., Ltd., Honghe 652339, Yunnan China)

Received:2024-07-11 Accepted:2024-08-19 Online:2024-10-31 Published:2025-01-25
Contact: SONG Jie

月季品种扦插生根能力综合量化评价

陈娟^1,2，郑天锐³，李世峰¹，李伟⁴，张颢¹，宋杰 ^1*

(1. 云南省农业科学院花卉研究所 / 国家观赏园艺工程技术研究中心 / 云南省花卉育种重点实验室，云南昆明 650205；2. 西南民族大学青藏高原研究院，四川成都 610041；3. 四川大学生命科学学院，四川成都 610064；4. 云南吉成园林科技股份有限公司，云南红河 652339)

通讯作者: 宋杰
基金资助:
云南省重大科技专项计划(202302AE090018)；云南省高层次科技人才及创新团队选拔专项(202305AS350002)；云南省创新引导与科技型企业培育计划(202304BT090021)；云南种子种业联合实验室项目(202205AR070001-2024KF02)

Abstract

Abstract: To comprehensively evaluate the rooting ability of different types and varieties of rose, and select the varieties with a strong rooting ability to provide reference for the future production and breeding of rose varieties, 59 rose varieties introduced and cultivated in Kunming, Yunnan Province, China were used as experimental materials, the root morphological indexes of rose cuttings were measured by WinRHIZO root analysis system, and the rooting ability of each rose variety was comprehensively quantitatively evaluated by principal component analysis and membership function analysis. The distribution of the root indexes of rose cuttings basically conformed to the normal distribution, except for the number of branches, the difference of the root indexes was small. Principal component analysis transformed 7 single indicators into 2 independent factors, with a cumulative contribution rate of 89.53%. Through membership function analysis, it was found that there were 23 varieties with a comprehensive score ≥0.40, accounting for 38.98%. In this study, 10 rose varieties with the strongest rooting ability were selected, including ‘Angela’, ‘Rouge Royal’, ‘Red Apple rose’, ‘Clg White Eden Rose’, ‘Highgrove’, ‘Pink Flamingo’, ‘Fensemenghuan’, ‘New Imagine’, ‘Billet Doux’ and ‘Crown Princess Margareta’, which can be used as a breed for large-scale production and as a parent for genetic improvement.

Key words: Rosa chinensis, cuttage, membership function method, principal component analysis, quantified estimate

摘要： 以引种栽培于昆明地区的59个不同类型的月季品种为材料，利用WinRHIZO根系分析系统测量月季扦插苗的根系形态指标，利用主成分分析法、隶属函数法对各品种的生根能力进行综合量化评价，筛选生根能力较强的品种。结果表明，月季扦插苗各根系指标的分布情况基本符合正态分布，除分支数外，月季各根系指标的差异较小。主成分分析将7个单项指标转换成2个相互独立的因子，累积贡献率为89.53%。通过隶属函数分析发现综合得分值≥0.40的月季品种有23个，占38.98%。筛选出‘安吉拉’‘皇家胭脂’‘红苹果’‘白色龙沙宝石’‘海格瑞’‘火烈鸟’‘粉色梦幻’‘新想象’‘情书’和‘玛格丽特王妃’等10个生根能力较强的品种，可作为规模化生产的品种和遗传改良的亲本。

关键词: 月季, 扦插, 隶属函数法, 主成分分析, 量化评价

CLC Number:

S685.12

CHEN Juan, ZHENG Tian-rui, LI Shi-feng, LI Wei, ZHANG Hao, SONG Jie. Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Cutting Rooting Ability of Rosa chinensis Varieties[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2024, 53(5): 459-467.

陈娟, 郑天锐, 李世峰, 李伟, 张颢, 宋杰. 月季品种扦插生根能力综合量化评价[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2024, 53(5): 459-467.

References

[1] Rose L, Lobet G. Accuracy of image analysis tools for functional root traits: A comment on Delory et al., 2017 [J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2019, 10(5): 702–711.

[2] 韩丹丹, 阮芳, 赵小慧, 李振涛, 李成俊, 马策. 102份切花月季品种资源表型多样性分析与综合评价[J/OL]. 分子植物育种, 2024: 1–17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal- FZZW2024042600C.html. [2024-07-11]

[3] 周丹燕. 不同基质配比对6个月季品种扦插繁殖效果的影响[J]. 植物学研究, 2023, 12(1): 18–25

[4] 杨碧楠, 严斐瑶, 刘明会, 明凤. 不同外源生长激素处理对两个月季品种扦插生根率的影响[J]. 上海师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 52(4): 468–477.

[5] 张宛, 霞李彤. 速效ABD植物生根促进剂在丰花月季扦插中的应用[J]. 广西农业科学, 2004, 35(3): 231.

[6] 谢安德, 侯文韬, 蒋志勇, 宋超, 伍慧瑜, 柯永芳, 任安. 植物生长调节剂ABT处理对藤本月季扦插生根效果的影响及其相关性和主成分分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(22): 123–126.

[7] 殷芳芳, 吴君, 连黄涛, 吴冬, 童再康. 丰花月季扦插繁殖技术研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(12): 71–75.

[8] 赵冰雪, 周琳, 黄清俊, 杨柳燕, 姚建军, 张永春. 不同微型月季品种扦插生根效果综合评价[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2021, 50(1): 39–45.

[9] 孙炜, 于瑞宁, 张飞, 蒋甲福, 陈发棣, 房伟民. 菊花扦插生根能力的量化评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(3): 540–548.

[10] 刘浩杰, 江婷蕊, 张雪峰, 苏江硕, 房伟民, 管志勇, 陈发棣, 张飞. 39个传统秋菊品种扦插生根能力综合评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2024, 33(2): 91–98.

[11] 孙雪莲, 杨楚童, 胡亚楠, 邹显花. 植物扦插生根机理的研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(10): 33–40.

[12] 赵鑫, 赵丽丽, 王普昶, 陈超. 内生真菌和丛枝菌根真菌提高植物逆境适应性研究进展[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(3): 577–591.

[13] 宋杰, 郑天锐, 张艺萍, 李世峰, 许凤, 王继华, 张颢, 瞿素萍. 昆明地区月季黑斑病发生规律及抗性评价[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 37(1): 47–53.

[14] 杨佳, 刘家迅, 梁明泰, 李学, 朱洪凤, 王春, 吴红芝. 云南地区月季白粉病发生及抗性鉴定[J]. 南方农业学报, 2023, 54(10): 2949–2957.

[15] 石力匀, 冯叶, 赵宗胜, 王佳妮, 代挽玉, 焦明丽, 何松林, 王政, 尚文倩, 申玉晓. 非生物胁迫对月季生长发育影响的研究进展[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2024, 58(1): 1–14.

[16] Hui F, Xie Z W, Li H G, Guo Y, Li B G, Liu Y L, Ma Y T. Image–based root phenotyping for field-grown crops: An example under maize/soybean intercropping [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(6): 1606–1619.

[17] 孔茹洁, 陈清, 赵英. 网格交叉法与WinRHIZO扫描法在植物根长测定中的比较[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 43(4): 20–24.

[18] 王小东, 王小青, 李令, 史文君. 丰花月季在不同基质中扦插繁殖研究[J]. 青海农林科技, 2022(3): 89–92.

[19] 谢安德, 尹冬勋, 侯文韬, 蒋志勇, 宋超, 伍慧瑜. 藤本月季繁殖技术在国内的研究进展[J]. 现代园艺, 2022, 45(15): 9–11.

[20] 雷利锋, 赵小娟, 马潇源, 刘新伟, 张黎. 微型盆栽月季扦插生根及根系生长因素分析[J]. 农业科学研究, 2020, 41(2): 81–86.

[21] 叶水英, 张玉芬. 不同植物生长调节剂对月季扦插生根的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2023, 29(Z1): 37–40.

[22] 何建科, 王静, 杜曲, 谢秋兰. 不同基质和植物生长调节剂对月季扦插生根的影响[J]. 中南农业科技, 2024, 45(2): 38–42.

[23] 宗树斌, 吴旭丽, 陈少卿, 付丹阳, 蔡鸿宇. 微型月季‘丘比特’恒温基质扦插繁殖技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(34): 79–85.

[24] 史星雲, 徐珊珊, 李艳冬, 李运兴, 郭方其, 殷益明. 基于主成分和聚类分析对切花百合品质的综合评价[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 54(4): 510–516.

[25] 张琳, 程亚男, 张欣, 杨伟婷, 孔庆涛, 谢东锋. 两种植物生长调节剂对木槿插穗生根的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(3): 123–129.

[26] 侯赵玉, 龚亦钊, 钱祎, 程卓雅, 陶俊, 赵大球. 芍药耐热性评价及其鉴定指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(23): 4742–4756.

[27] 叶康, 陈伯祥, 杜习武, 秦俊, 曾丽, 胡永红. 3个玉兰材料对水涝胁迫的响应与耐涝性评价[J]. 西北植物学报, 2023, 43(6): 940–947.

[28] Wang M B, Zhang Q. Issues in using the WinRHIZO system to determine physical characteristics of plant fine roots [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(2): 136–138.

[29] Liese R, Alings K, Meier I C. Root branching is a leading root trait of the plant economics spectrum in temperate trees [J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 315.

[30] 田厚禄, 王二林. 栓皮栎控根育苗方法对苗木生长的影响研究[J]. 花卉, 2022(16): 145–147.

[31] 李立文, 阳春明, 裴劲松, 谭显胜, 左少艾. 湘中地区露地栽培月季品种的筛选与综合评价[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2022(3): 67–71.

Metrics

Copyright © Editorial office of Subtropical Plant Science
Tel: 0592-5654157　E-mail: yrdzwkx@126.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.

Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Cutting Rooting Ability of Rosa chinensis Varieties

月季品种扦插生根能力综合量化评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 14

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	HONG Zhi-meng, XIA Si-ying. Physiological Response of Prunus pseudocerasus × incisa to High Temperature Stress [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2023, 52(5): 398-403.
[2]	HUANG Xiao-long, OU Cheng-chuan, LIU Xiao-li, LI Qiu-fen, LI Zhen-qin, LI Si-tong, WANG Jun-ning. Screening and Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of 9 Water Spinach Germplasm at Germination Stage [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2023, 52(2): 108-118.
[3]	KANG Kai-li, TU Ji-hong, LIANG Yu-ting, YU Jing-fu, WANG Pu. The Selection of Cultivation Substrate for Hydrangea macrophylla [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2022, 51(5): 374-379.
[4]	WEI Wen-hua, TAN Shi-jun, ZHOU Wei-chao, XU Zhu-liang. Fruit Nutritional Evaluation of Different Phyllanthus emblica Varieties [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2021, 50(02): 88-91.
[5]	CHEN Juan, CHEN Lu, XIE Tai-xiang, PENG Dong-hui, AI Ye. Ornamental Characteristics Evaluation of Cymbidium sinense Cultivars Using the Principal Component Analysis [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2019, 48(03): 261-268.
[6]	YE Chang-hui,CHEN Ting-hui,CHEN Heng-heng,ZHENG Xiao-ting,CHEN Dan,WU Tian. Effects of IBA and NAA on Cutting Propagation of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa [J]. , 2017, 46(02): 185-187.
[7]	MA Nan，LIU Jian-hua，LEI Jiang-li. Physiological Responses of 4 Species of Parterre Flower under PEG Simulated Drought Stress [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2015, 44(03): 193-198.
[8]	HUANG Hua-rong,DONG Qi-yu,YANG Ya-hui,HU Rou-xuan,CHEN Hong-yue. Study on Physical and Chemical Properties of Different Stands in Qingyun Forest Park of Wengyuan County [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2015, 44(02): 135-139.
[9]	CHEN Dong-yang. The Effect of the Characteristics of Cinnamomum camphora var. linaloolifera Cuttings on Their Survival Rate [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2012, 41(03): 69-72.
[10]	ZENG Qing-qian,YANG Hong-mei,HUANG Shan-shan,MO Xiao-lu. Study on Cutting Propagation Technique for Baphicacanthus cusia [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2011, 40(04): 71-74.
[11]	YUAN Ju-hong. Numerical Taxonomy and Principal Component Analysis of Lycoris from China [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2010, 39(03): 32-37.
[12]	YAO Qing-qun, BAI Chang-jun, WANG Wen-qiang, CHEN Zhi-quan, YU Dao-geng, LIU Guo-dao. Different Statistical Methods for Comprehensive Evaluation of Legume Germplasms [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2009, 38(01): 26-30.
[13]	HE Bing, HUANG Rui. Cuttage experiment of main shoot of Ficus microcarpa [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2003, 32(03): 31-34.
[14]	GUO Cui-ying, SHEN Yu-fen, XU Wen-jiang, LU Ling-ling, BAI Fu-hai. Introduction and culture of Hylocereus undatus [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2001, 30(04): 23-26.