保鲜剂及冷藏对鹤望兰切花瓶插品质的影响

亚热带植物科学 ›› 2006, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (04): 32-34,38.

保鲜剂及冷藏对鹤望兰切花瓶插品质的影响

陈源泉¹,陈诗林²,黄敏玲¹,林兵¹,吴建设¹,叶秀仙¹

1. 福建省农业科学院花卉研究中心, 福建福州 350013;
2. 福建省农业科学院生物技术研究所, 福建福州 350003

收稿日期:2006-05-08 出版日期:2006-11-10 发布日期:2006-11-10
作者简介:陈源泉(1981-),男,福建安溪人,研究实习员,从事观赏植物育种与配套技术研究。

Effects of Preservative Formulas and Storage on the Vase Ornamental Quality of Cut Strelitzia reginae Flower

CHEN Yuan-quan¹, CHEN Shi-lin², HUANG Min-ling¹, LIN Bing¹, WU Jian-she¹, YE Xiu-xian¹

1. Research Center of Floriculture, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350013, Fujian China;
2. Institute of Biotechnology, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, Fujian China

Received:2006-05-08 Online:2006-11-10 Published:2006-11-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文探讨不同保鲜剂、预处理液及冷藏时间对鹤望兰切花瓶插寿命和观赏品质的影响。结果表明,供试的8组瓶插保鲜液中,以配方5% S+300 mg/L 8-HQC+100 mg/L CA+150 mg/L STS+100 mg/L CoCl₂+25 mg/L EDTA-Na保鲜效果最佳,切花瓶插寿命(23.5 d)比CK延长15.2 d,小花开放率(56.1%)比CK提高1.19倍。供试的5组冷藏预处理液中,以10% S+300 mg/L 8-HQC+75 mg/L KH₂PO₄·3H₂O效果最佳,切花经过2~3周8~10℃冷藏后,瓶插寿命(13.7 d)比CK延长7.9 d,小花开放率(43.6%)比CK提高98.2%;该处理组鹤望兰切花的适宜冷藏时间可延长为3周。

关键词: 鹤望兰切花, 保鲜剂, 预处理, 冷藏, 瓶插寿命

Abstract: Different preservative formulas, preconditioning liquids and refrigerating time influenced on vase life and quality of cut Strelitzia reginae flowers were studied.The results showed that 5% S+300 mg/L 8-HQC+100 mg/L CA+150 mg/L STS+100 mg/L CoCl₂+25 mg/L EDTA-Na was the best of the 8 various preservatives.The vase life of cut flower (23.5 days) lengthened 15.2 days, and the blooming rate of small flowers (56.1%) increased by 1.19 times compared to CK.The prescription of 10% S+300 mg/L 8-HQC+75 mg/L KH₂PO₄·3H₂O was the best of the 5 various preconditioning liquids.The vase life of the cut flower was 13.7 days after refrigeration of 2 to 3 weeks under 8~10℃.The vase life lengthened 7.9 days, and the blooming rate of the small flowers (43.6%) increased by 98.2%.The suitable cold storage time for cut Strelitzia reginae flowers could lengthen to 3 weeks.

Key words: Strelitzia reginae, cut flower, preservative formulas, preconditioning, refrigeration, vase life

中图分类号:

Q945
S682.2

陈源泉,陈诗林,黄敏玲,林兵,吴建设,叶秀仙. 保鲜剂及冷藏对鹤望兰切花瓶插品质的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2006, 35(04): 32-34,38.

CHEN Yuan-quan, CHEN Shi-lin, HUANG Min-ling, LIN Bing, WU Jian-she, YE Xiu-xian. Effects of Preservative Formulas and Storage on the Vase Ornamental Quality of Cut Strelitzia reginae Flower[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2006, 35(04): 32-34,38.

[1]	杨运英，卢淑仪，王廷芹. 保鲜剂对天门冬切叶的保鲜效应[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2020, 49(05): 345-350.
[2]	黄小均,潘婷婷,罗国容,陈娟. 四种简易切花保鲜剂比较试验[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2007, 36(03): 46-48,55.
[3]	林兵,黄敏玲,叶贻源,吴建设,叶秀仙. 种球冷藏处理及栽培方式对荷兰鸢尾花期调节的效应[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2005, 34(02): 51-52.
[4]	郭兆武,邹应斌,夏石头. 一种新型花烛切花保鲜剂的效果[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2004, 33(02): 13-17.
[5]	宋丽莉,彭永宏. GA₃预处理对冷藏百合切花花瓣衰老的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2004, 33(01): 8-11.
[6]	章玉平,冼昭燕,程筱莹. 不同保鲜剂对非洲菊切花的保鲜效应[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2004, 33(01): 26-28.
[7]	廖立新,彭永宏,许德诚,曾佑伟,徐良雄. 冷藏唐菖蒲切花瓶插过程中水分平衡及若干生理指标的变化[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2003, 32(03): 10-15.
[8]	游雪婷,李伟娟,凌丽凤,章玉平. 不同保鲜剂对月季切花的保鲜效应[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2003, 32(02): 26-28.
[9]	陈洪国,王育林,彭永宏. 冷藏荔枝货架期品质与生理变化[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2001, 30(03): 11-15.
[10]	周华新,黄维南,徐志伟. 四种鲜切花保鲜剂的筛选[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2000, 29(04): 9-13.
[11]	苏军,叶文. 贮藏方式对切花菊贮后品质的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 1993, 22(01): 23-27.
[12]	秦文,王大华,徐玉华,徐春洪. 黄果柑优系鲜果常温贮藏初探[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 1993, 22(01): 55-57.
[13]	苏军,叶文,李招文. 小苍兰切花不完全开放的原因探讨及防止措施[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 1992, 21(01): 38-41.