| [1] 李振问. 火力楠林带的防火效果研究[J]. 厦门大学学报(自然科学版), 2002,41(5): 596—599.[2] 冯慧芳,薛立,任向荣,傅静丹,郑卫国,史小玲. 4种阔叶幼苗对PEG模拟干旱的生理响应[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(2): 371—382.[3] 薛立,韦如萍,谭天泳,邝立刚，韦美满. 华南阔叶树种幼苗叶片的养分特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003,14(11): 1820—1824.[4] 林上杰. 不同坡位火力楠人工林水源涵养能力的比较[J]. 亚热带农业研究, 2013,9(2): 82—87.[5] 曹鹤,薛立,谢腾芳,王相娥,傅静丹,郑卫国. 华南8种人工林的土壤物理性质研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009,28(4): 620—625.[6] 谢腾芳,薛立,王相娥,傅静丹,郑卫国. 火力楠和红苞木幼林的土壤肥力研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2009,29(6): 84—86,114.[7] 薛立,李燕,屈明,晏姝,王相娥. 火力楠、荷木和黎蒴林的土壤特性及涵养水源的研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005,16(9): 1623—1627.[8] 薛立,薛晔,吴敏,郭淑红,张柔,杨振意. 不同坡位火力楠林土壤肥力变化特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011,31(6): 51—54.[9] 汪思龙,廖利平,马越强. 杉木火力楠混交林养分归还与生产力[J]. 应用生态学报, 1997,8(4): 347—352.[10] 廖利平,马越强,汪思龙,高洪,于小军. 杉木与主要阔叶造林树种叶凋落物的混合分解[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000,24(1): 27—33.[11] Royo A A, Carson W P. On the formation of dense understory layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2006,36: 1345—1362.[12] Taylor A H, Huang J Y, Zhou S Q. Canopy tree development and undergrowth bamboo dynamics in old-growth Abies-Betula forests in southwestern China: a 12-year study[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004,200: 347—360.[13] Beckage B, Clark J S. Seedling survival and growth of three forest tree species: the role of spatial heterogeneity[J]. Ecology, 2003,84: 1849—1861.[14] Christie D A, Armesto J J. Regeneration microsites and tree species coexistence in temperate rain forests of Chiloé Island, Chile[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2003,91: 776—784. [15] Giordano C V, Sánchez R A, Austin A T. Gregarious bamboo flowering opens a window of opportunity for regeneration in a temperate forest of Patagonia[J]. New Phytologist, 2009,181: 880–889.[16] 陈伟,薛立. 根系间的相互作用——竞争与互利[J]. 生态学报, 2004,24(6): 1243—1251.[17] Fitter A H, Stickland T R. Architectural analysis of plant root systems. II. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species[J]. New PPhytologist, 1991,118: 383—389.[18] Lynch J, Van Beem J J. Growth and architecture of seedling roots of common bean genotypes[J]. Crop Science, 1993,33: 1253—1257. |
