Subtropical Plant Science ›› 2018, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (04): 357-362.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2018.04.010

• Plant ecology, resources and taxonomy • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Landscape Quality Evaluation of Rhododendron moulmainense Aesthetic Forest in Shenzhen Wutong Mountain

SHI Bo, WANG Ding-yue, CHEN Shi-qing, LI Wen-hua, LIN Jin-tao   

  1. (1.College of Forestry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong China; 2.Management Office of Wutong Mountain National Park, Shenzhen 518004, Guangdong China; 3.Guangzhou Landscape Company, Guangzhou 510440, Guangdong China)
  • Received:2018-07-23 Revised:2018-08-17 Online:2018-12-30 Published:2018-12-30
  • Contact: CHEN Shi-qing

深圳市梧桐山毛棉杜鹃风景林景观质量评价

时波,王定跃,陈世清,李文华,林锦涛   

  1. (1.华南农业大学森林经理研究室,广东 广州 510642;2.深圳市梧桐山风景名胜区管理处,广东 深圳 518004;3.广州市绿化公司,广东 广州 510440)
  • 通讯作者: 陈世清
  • 作者简介:时波,硕士研究生,从事城市园林植物应用研究。
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市梧桐山管理处项目“深圳市梧桐山杜鹃类生态景观林抚育技术规范”

Abstract: In order to get a more accurate evaluation of the quality about Rhododendron moulmainense aesthetic forest, and provide a more comprehensive and general quality evaluation system about flowering tree of ornaments, on the basis of literature about evaluation of aesthetic forest, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to build the evaluation system and ascertain various levels index weights by 3 projects, 13 indexes and 38 classes. The index weight of the forest outside the landscape, the single tree landscape, and the forest inside the landscape are respectively 0.6483, 0.2270, 0.1591. Through field survey and evaluation, the flower screen score is 52.8466, with a better grade. The valley of R. moulmainense score is 44.5834, with a good grade, the double phoenix pavilion score is 20.0336, with a poor grade.

Key words: Rhododendronmoulmainense, aesthetic forest, landscape quality assessment, analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

摘要: 为了对毛棉杜鹃风景林的景观质量进行较为准确的景观评价,并提供较为全面和通用的观花乔木景观质量评价体系,在查阅国内风景林评价文献的基础上,采用层次分析法从3个准则和13个指标构建毛棉杜鹃风景林质量评价体系及各层次指标权重。通过德尔菲法确定林外景观质量、单木景观质量、林内景观质量三个项目层权重分别为0.6483、0.2270、0.1591。对毛棉杜鹃景观林贡献程度较大的有色彩对比度、树冠层次性、花色等指标。通过实地调查并按上述体系评价,得到梧桐山万花屏得分为52.8466,属于很好等级;毛棉杜鹃谷得分为44.5834,属于较好等级;双凤亭为20.0336,属于很差等级。

关键词: 毛棉杜鹃, 风景林, 景观质量评价, 层次分析法

CLC Number: