Subtropical Plant Science ›› 2010, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (04): 28-32.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2010.04.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Analysis of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration Computation in Shenzhen

ZHENG Xi1, WANG Qi2, SUN Ji-xiong1   

  1. 1. College of Grassland Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu China;
    2. Yunnan Forestry Vocational Technical College, Kunming 650224, Yunan China
  • Received:2010-06-04 Online:2010-12-10 Published:2010-12-10

深圳地区参考作物蒸散量计算方法适用性分析

郑汐1,王齐2,孙吉雄1   

  1. 1. 甘肃农业大学 草业学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    2. 云南林业职业技术学院, 云南 昆明 650224
  • 作者简介:郑汐(1983-),男,四川富顺人,硕士研究生,从事草坪和园林植物研究。
  • 基金资助:

    深圳市中水灌溉绿地水质控制指标及安全性评价项目

Abstract: Based on meteorological data of Shenzhen from 1998 to 2007, the paper studied reference crop evapotranspiration by using Hargreaves method, Pristley-Taylor method and Irmark-Allen method with the FAO Penman-Monteith method as the standard, attempt to estimate applicability of the three methods.The results show that mean monthly reference crop evapotranspiration and annual mean reference crop evapotranspiration of Irmark-Allen and Penman-Monteith is no significant difference, but are deviated from Hargreaves method and Pristley-Taylor method which Hargreaves is the most volume and Pristley-Taylor is least.The correlation of Irmark-Allen method, Pristley-Taylor method and Penman-Monteith are overestimated.Irmark-Allen method is advisable to estimate ET0 when hard to get relatively meteorological data in Shenzhen.

Key words: reference crop evapotranspiration, calculation method, applicability

摘要: 根据深圳1998~2007日值气象资料,以4种方法计算参考作物蒸散量,并以FAO Penman-Monteith公式计算结果为标准,评价其他各公式在深圳的适用性。结果表明:Irmark-Allen公式的月平均参考作物蒸散量及年参考作物蒸散量与Penman-Monteith公式结果没有显著差异,与Hargreaves公式和Pristley-Taylor公式计算结果差异显著,Hargreaves最大,Pristley-Taylor最小;Irmark-Allen公式、Pristley-Taylor公式与Penman-Monteith公式的相关性较高,而Hargreaves相关性较低。Irmark-Allen法可作为深圳地区缺少相关气象资料条件下计算ET0较理想的替代方法。

关键词: 参考作物蒸散量, 计算方法, 适用性

CLC Number: